recently launched russian satellites., page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 15-12-2003 @ 07:36 AM by Nerdling
Oh, now if only they had the money to outfit their military with GPS.



reply posted on 15-12-2003 @ 09:41 AM by FULCRUM
Originally posted by Nerdling
Oh, now if only they had the money to outfit their military with GPS.


Stupid head..

GLONASS and GPS are two different but similar systems.



GLONASS / GPS Comparison!

The first GPS satellite was launched in 1978 and the first products for civilian consumers appeared in the mid 1980's. It was in 1984 that President Reagan announced that a portion of the capabilities of GPS would be made availabe to the civil community. The system is still being improved and new, better satellites are still being launched to replace older ones.

Navstar (NAVigation Satellite Tracking And Ranging), now just called GPS, launched their first satellite in 1978. Navstar is also referred to in web sites for GPS.



So in 1978 it wasnt a GPS satellite launched.



GLONASS History!



[Edited on 15-12-2003 by FULCRUM]



reply posted on 15-12-2003 @ 06:26 PM by SeaBass
Originally posted by mooeuro
Originally posted by SeaBass
Common sense dicates that any new GPS-type system being put into service will be better than the last.

My questions is, how accurate a position do you need for civilian purposes? Since most civilian applications are for navigation, the currrent system is sufficient in my opinion.

Link


it not about whether the system is sufficient enough, its a matter of autonomy as America can voluntarily suspend service of there system to other countries.


The service itself cannot be restricted to a particular country. The service is beamed globally - it has to do with the receivers. Those can be altered.



reply posted on 15-12-2003 @ 10:42 PM by THENEO
Russian,

you make a good point.
I have respect for the Russian and former east block's almost slavish loyalty to engineering and sciences and I have great respect for those people I have known such qualified.

It is doubtful that anyone in the west truly knows the extent of Russian capability but we tend to measure a societies abilities in relation to its ability to serve the markets.

I think this is a valid measure to a degree even with the Modern Russia because Russia desparately needs Western Currency as always and it must find a way to earn it. It makes a lot of sense for Russia to start selling its products to the world to earn this money needed for so many purposes. So far Russia has primarily been able to supply resources and raw materials and some armaments and weapons. Much of Russian products cannot hope to compete in the rest of the world. That may change in future and I expect improvement in future in the ability of Russian industry to compete. But for a former superpower it is less than impressive so far.

You are suggesting that Russia emphasizes military power, and it does, but then it should be able to blow everyone else out of the water so to speak. I see no evidence of this and I would say that except for certain areas, the Russian military technology is probably average with the advantage of a wide range of products and I am assuming here productive capability (that also remains to be seen too).

Anyways unless Russia has a lot of hidden arms and weapons the obvious reality is not overwhelming to the casual outside observer.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Nano Drones Flying in Formation
  Posted 11 days ago with 15 member flags
FPS RUSSIA
  Posted 16 days ago with 7 member flags
Spinel Thin Transparent Ceramic Armor defeats Barrett .50 Cal BMG
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
Defective Ammunition Warning
  Posted 4 days ago with 6 member flags
Self-steering Bullet Researched
  Posted 12 days ago with 5 member flags
Shockrounds take out three of your five senses.
  Posted 5 days ago with 5 member flags
Taking the Crowd Out of Firing 155mm Artillery.
  Posted 13 days ago with 4 member flags