Originally posted by Headhurts Incidentally, there were some mummified remains found in China recently that had blonde and red hair and
were tall. These findings have also been suppressed.
And I agree with Essan and TheWalkingFox, "suppressing this blonde mummies in China" is just not quite right.
And hey actually I knew what happened. As we all knew the Chinese emperor had been crazy about immortality, and they heard about mummification
technology from other part of the world and then they sent off their best seafarers to North Africa, but they stopped by Europe and they found tonnes
of blond mummies there, and it was for sale at dirt cheap price. Instead of asking for the high price technology, they just bought off specimens to do
some reverse engineering later on ( that's what Chinese always do anyway till nowadays ). In order to make sure they could gain the technology fully,
they needed full range of specimens. So they bought a whole ship mummies back home, including babies mummies, boys and girls, young adults virgin and
bachelor, adults, breast feeding mothers, pretty much everything.
They put it at the secret labs in Uygur, during halfway of gaining the technologies, the dessert storm buried the labs together with all those
specimen. 2,000 years later the modern blond men dig it up and claimed hey blonde man is Native to china. But sadly the Communist Chinese government
is surpressing it.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox Plain fact is, even if there were people there prior to the Maori, and even if they were white (HUGE
stretch, by the way) they were not the ancestors of modern white NZ'ers. Every white face in New Zealand is the descendant of Europeans who moved in
after 1769. If there were a bunch of white people living on the islands before the Maori, they certainly weren't there by the time Europeans showed
So far the only racism out here is your own, since you think you deserve entitlements because you're white.
See how true this is. But white blonde always rules and they always able to dig up some artifacts to confirm their theories.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox At the time of the treaty, the Maori were the only people on the islands. That's easy as all heck to
even if they were not the first people, whoever may have been first was not around, and it certainly wasn't the English.
I think we need to know the time frame, situation and condition to claim being a native such as you said above "...Maori were the only people on the
How about the Japanese who being flushed to Hokkaido?
Originally posted by KRISKALI777 There is much evidence of natives already being established in NZ before the Moari came. These people
have been called the Maori.
Yes that could be true either, as many real Indians from India in America today. They are called American!
And as TheWalkingFox said current white Kiwis moved in not before 1769 or was it 96?
69 and 96 is always confusing..
Archeology claims is always bias and based on own assumptions that suit archeologists racisms problem sometimes, if not worse than religion.
Couldn't we leave this to pure science?
For Maori in NZ case, it could be true that the government is trying to do something to cover their earlier wrong assumption about Maori is native to
NZ, which could be a nice move to save Maori's current rights and affairs.
Perhaps in future we should have no more countries, all lives as one. The only thing to surpress is our own greed, no more I am better than you vice
By the way, did they find some prove about white blonde prior to aborigin also in Australia? Mmmm you know so they could claim white blonde was the
actual native to Australia?