It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

January 2007 photo too good to be true?

page: 4
7
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 22 2007 @ 07:00 PM
link   
both sightings on this thread, both look very similar.

link1

link2

same sort of trees, same murky overcast day. and both photographers seem intent on capturing those thin spindly branches infront of the object.

were both sightings/photos by the same person?

even with the third baloon shaped one HERE, the shot framing is identical, make sure its framed - even intruded by branches.

this is causeing me to lean towards serial hoaxer. I think this person has technique down to an art, and is using the same processes on all three.

[edit on 22/1/07 by lbennie]




posted on Jan, 22 2007 @ 09:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by TravisT
Thats the only thing I never understood about UFOs. If an alien who can travel to different planets comes here, then why do they have lights on there ship? Why would you need lights on a craft that is traveling in space to far stretches of the universe? You NEVER see a UFO with windows, so whats the deal with lights? They would be pointless.



Perhaps you could try thinking outside the box.

Just Like magnetism, science is STILL learning alot about light.
Just because the main thing we monkeys use light for is to see with it, doesn't necessarily mean that is the only thing that light is good for.

Perhaps we still have a lot to learn about light..hmmm?



posted on Jan, 22 2007 @ 10:26 PM
link   

it also seems a bit odd that they're all taken by the same person ( please correct me if I'm wrong)


your wrong


the author claims they are all taken by different people, however the same "investigator's" name is attached to all three CLEAR pictures. Can anyone dig up any info on that investigator? I wouldnt mind giving him a call or an email. Notice how his (or the people he represents) pictures are even on the front page of ufoevidence.org.. I mean that might be some incentive for a hoax right there.

Althoughmy gut feeling is that the saucer photos are real....

[edit on 22-1-2007 by hiii_98]



posted on Jan, 22 2007 @ 10:37 PM
link   
fooffstarr,

I would have to say that is the real deal. Wow! nice find.



posted on Jan, 22 2007 @ 11:13 PM
link   
Nice photos, looks real.
Now all we need are photos from inside the ship



posted on Jan, 23 2007 @ 01:52 AM
link   
Well on the face of it, it ticks the boxes.

It's definately a photograph of an unexplained object.

But I can't help but feel that it has more terrestrial origins, as someone else pointed out with the aviation lights.

Either way, it's a damn good photo.



posted on Jan, 23 2007 @ 01:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by lbennie

same sort of trees, same murky overcast day. and both photographers seem intent on capturing those thin spindly branches infront of the object.

were both sightings/photos by the same person?

even with the third baloon shaped one HERE, the shot framing is identical, make sure its framed - even intruded by branches.

this is causeing me to lean towards serial hoaxer. I think this person has technique down to an art, and is using the same processes on all three.

[edit on 22/1/07 by lbennie]


Dude, its in Wisconsin. Its pretty much always a murky overcast day (in the winter anyway) and there are trees everywhere. Those facts dont disuade me from believing in the potential legitimacy of these pictures.



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 12:31 AM
link   

Its pretty much always a murky overcast day (in the winter anyway) and there are trees everywhere. Those facts dont disuade me from believing in the potential legitimacy of these pictures.


CONFIRMED, lol, yes everyday in the winter is pretty miserable, dark , overcast. Also we do have trees everywhere. So i dont think those point to a hoax, just the common landscape and typical shtty weather conditions.

Also i'm noticing a strange coincidence that all of the best photos on ufoevidence.org seem to be taken in wisconsin, and taken somewhat recently. These are also taken roughly in almost the same region of wisconsin... For example:

ufoevidence.org...
ufoevidence.org...
ufoevidence.org...
ufoevidence.org...

From my research we have very very little military bases here, and only one or two leads on a secret base, that to me sounds more like wishful thinking than based in any reality. From my plot chart, it seems like the ships are coming from a south western direction and flying over greenbay out towards lake Michigan.

[edit on 25-1-2007 by hiii_98]



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 12:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by hiii_98

From my research we have very very little military bases here, and only one or two leads on a secret base, that to me sounds more like wishful thinking than based in any reality. From my plot chart, it seems like the ships are coming from a south western direction and flying over greenbay out towards lake Michigan.

[edit on 25-1-2007 by hiii_98]


I was sure there was a base over in Osh Kosh. I wish I still lived in Wisconsin (I just moved back to Nebraska), Id try and get some pictures of the base.



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 12:53 AM
link   

I was sure there was a base over in Osh Kosh.

can you google map it for us?

[edit on 25-1-2007 by hiii_98]



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 01:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by hiii_98

I was sure there was a base over in Osh Kosh.

can you google map it for us?

[edit on 25-1-2007 by hiii_98]


As it turns out, I was wrong. I was thinking of that decomissioned Air Force Base over there... Its just that its decomissioned.

Still when they have air shows, you see some weird stuff in the area. Nothing like those pictures though. Sorry about the confusion.



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 03:08 AM
link   
The first post was not of the same object in both pictures, the sky isn't the same and neither is the light pattern. In the second post the objects in the pictures seem to differ as well, count the lights..... maybe aliens just like to switch it up a little to give everyone on xtc a nice lightshow but I doubt it.... Maybe it's a floating disco? Don't get me wrong, I'm sure there's plenty of good reasons for those spotlights during normal daytime operations, but still...

Oh yeah, the 3rd set of ufo pics, almost forgot.... Anyone know where to get 1 of those for next years Christmas tree??

[edit on 25-1-2007 by Shifter]



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 03:51 AM
link   
Notice how in the first picture of the craft the lights seem to be larger and more illuminated than the lights in the other pics? I think that might have something to do with the engine... maybe all that anti-matter or the anti-gravity propulsion device gets brighter as it's being used, and more dim when not used as much. Just a thought.



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 05:33 AM
link   
I really like these pics. Good timing I think more than anything.

I can sort of go with the case of it being earth made due to the lights underneath. But on the other hand, does anyone know of any ET's that can tell us if thier ships have lights underneath? I think not.

I like the joke about a pic from inside just to sort the debunkers out but again, highly improbable.

On a more serious note........ That saucer is pretty feckin low IMO. It also seems that there are a lot of sightings lately that are getting the attention they deserve on sites like this but WHERE ARE THEY ON THE NEWS????

Surely if you had proof like this you would take it to all major news networks. If they reject the story publish names here so we know which tv networks take orders from others.

Remirah.



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 06:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by Reality Hurts
*raises hand*

Err, anyone notice that the "lights" overlap the branches in pictures 2 and 3?

*sits back down*



Originally posted by MischeviousElf
I believe thve been here and probably still are,

if you look at the photo though you will see lights infront of branches that should block the view, a fake I think.

Kind regards

Elf.


Oh brother!! I guess it's an edukashin thing? Ever heard of "refraction"? Light can bend... it really can... honest... look it up...



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 12:29 PM
link   
given the complexity of the photograph if it was a hoax , i doubt the hoaxer would be so inept as to simply photoshop some lights over tree branches after all of the other flawless intricate details of the photo. To simply paste or draw in lights over the branches is something a newbie to photoshop would do, not someone expereinced enough to build the rest of the model to a near flawless degree. Look at the consistant blur motion of movement of both the craft and the camera effect on the tree and craft for example. Or how their is no pixelation at each branch in comparison to the craft if the craft or tree was "pasted" into frame. The lights are not pasted ontop of the branches but are behind and using a previously mentioned common form of physics to move around the branches. If someone where to shine a spotlight at you, and there was a tiny tree branch in the middle, you would not even see the branch but rather one solid light from my understanding.



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 09:04 PM
link   
so the conclusion is that this is the first real and clear ufo photo....ever?...



posted on Jan, 26 2007 @ 04:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by hiii_98
so the conclusion is that this is the first real and clear ufo photo....ever?...


I have to agree. I believe this to be as close to authentic as we are possibly going see in a long time!

[edit on 26/1/2007 by shearder]



posted on Jan, 26 2007 @ 12:45 PM
link   
I was thinking the same lbennie, re comparison, yet link II was supposedly taken in /03. Certainly the tree branches in the foreground are similar. Great thinking

Dallas



posted on Jan, 26 2007 @ 02:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by hiii_98
so the conclusion is that this is the first real and clear ufo photo....ever?...


I hope so!

If the picture is indeed real to bad there is a not a video to go along with it!




top topics



 
7
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join