Originally posted by dave420
Please furnish us with the names of the many, many scientists who have seen the light and found evidence for creationism. Seriously - you'd be up for a nobel prize if you can find just one. You'll get a trip to Stockholm, Sweden, some money, and a medal.
Well how about those top world famous secular evolutionary scientists who have finally seen the light about evolution? Mmmm lets see now,,
“More than 30 years of experimentation on the origin of life in the fields of chemical and molecular evolution have led to a better perception of the immensity of the problem of the origin of life on Earth rather than to its solution. At present all discussions on principal theories and experiments in the field either end in a stalemate or in a confession of ignorance.”
- Professor Dr. Klause Dose who is Director of the Institute for Biochemistry at Johannes Gutenberg University in West Germany
“An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears as the moment to be almost a miracle, so many are the conditions which had to have been satisfied to get it going.”
-Dr. Francis Crick, Nobel Prize winner, biochemist, and co-discover of the structure of the DNA molecule
"Question is: Can you tell me anything you know about evolution, any one thing that is true? I tried this question on the geology staff at the Field Museum of Natural History and the only answer I got was silence. I tried it on the members of the Evolutionary Morphology seminar in the University of Chicago, a very prestigious body of evolutionists, and all I got there was silence for a long time but eventually one person said, ‘I do know one thing – it ought not to be taught in high school.’ Then I woke up and realized that all my life I had been duped into taking evolutionism as revealed truth in some way." - Dr. Colin Patterson, senior paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History and editor of its journal, as well as author of the book Evolution
“Evolution is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science." - Dr. Louis Bounoure, former president of the Biological Society of Strasbourg, Director of the Zoological Museum and Director of Research of the National Center for Scientific Research in Evolution, France
"Directed by all-powerful (natural) selection, chance becomes a sort of providence, which, under the cover of atheism, is not named but which is secretly worshipped." Pierre-Paul Grasse', the most distinguished of French zoologists, editor of the 28 volumes of Traite’ de Zoologie, author of numerous original investigations, and ex-president of the French Academy of Sciences, Author of the book, ‘Evolution of Living Organisms’
“This situation, where scientific men rally to the defense of a doctrine they are unable to define scientifically, much less demonstrate with scientific rigour, attempting to maintain its credit with the public by the suppression of criticism and the eliminations of difficulties, is abnormal and undesirable in science." - Dr. W.R. Thompson
"In fact, evolution became in a sense a scientific religion. Almost all scientists have accepted it and many are prepared to 'bend' their observations to fit in with it. To my mind the theory does not stand up at all." - Dr. H. S. Lipson, Professor of Physics at the University of Manchester
leading secular scientists are refuting neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory, based on their admissions alone:
(1) The theory's explanations (principles, predictions, interpretations) do not match with actual observations in the real world;
(2) The theory's principles, predictions, and interpretations limit the advancement of science; and,
(3) The theory's principles, predictions, and interpretations are based more on religious faith than on scientific fact.
Stephen C. Lawler, Author Researcher
"... I was much struck how entirely vague and arbitrary is the distinction between species and varieties" Darwin 1859 (p. 48)[42]
"No term is more difficult to define than "species," and on no point are zoologists more divided than as to what should be understood by this word". Nicholson (1872) p. 20[43]
"Of late, the futility of attempts to find a universally valid criterion for distinguishing species has come to be fairly generally, if reluctantly, recognized" Dobzhansky (1937) p.310 [10]
"The concept of a species is a concession to our linguistic habits and neurological mechanisms" Haldane (1956) [33]
"The species problem is the long-standing failure of biologists to agree on how we should identify species and how we should define the word 'species'." Hey (2001) [37]
"First, the species problem is not primarily an empirical one, but it is rather fraught with philosophical questions that require-but cannot be settled by-empirical evidence." Pigliucci (2003) [36]
"An important aspect of any species definition whether in neontology or palaeontology is that any statement that particular individuals (or fragmentary specimens) belong to a certain species is an hypothesis (not a fact)"[44]
Then I woke up and realized that all my life I had been duped into taking evolutionism as revealed truth in some way."
- Dr. Colin Patterson, senior paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History, author of the book Evolution,
Darwinian Evolution, It's time we quit holding back science and tell Evolutionist's to either show us the mountain of evidence or get the hell out of the Schools Science Dept.
No-one thought up "evolution" and then decided to find evidence to fit it. - Dave
Chucky Darwin, discoverer of one of the biggest on-going hoax's in history.
"In fact, evolution became in a sense a scientific religion. Almost all scientists have accepted it and many are prepared to 'bend' their observations to fit in with it. To my mind the theory does not stand up at all." - Dr. H. S. Lipson, Professor of Physics at the University of Manchester
Wanna bet piltdown dave
- Con
[edit on 10-5-2008 by Conspiriology]
