It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A hardened skeptic seeing remote viewing as an acceptable explanation seems unlikely. To me.
I have no reservations at all, though, in saying that an alleged time traveller who could not provide some decent predictions would not impress me at all. It's entry-level stuff in the time-travelling biz.
Transcribe SOTU and the Queen's speech for your target year (because they're likely to be widely recorded media events);
write down the times locations and intensities of say 5 geological events.
"...All things being equal, the simplest solution tends to be the best one."
The point of signing is to have a publicly available record of the time of signing. 'They' might prevail upon Verisign to disavow your signature,
In the movie "Frequency" a guy from the past places a wallet under a floor board, so that the guy from the present could find it. With that in mind, I suppose a time traveller could go back in time and do the same thing to prove it to me.
I am not a big believer in time travel also. I feel the past is gone, not "recorded" on some galactic tape recorder for us to go back to and the future has not yet happened so it can't be visited.
Why would you want to prove you are a time traveller anyway? If you did, you know the govt would rush in to silence you.
The only reason I can see someone wanting to prove they are a time travller is to stop a person from getting hurt or a major disaster from happening.
Go forward, or back, and find me, then have me write me a letter containing things only I would know.
Return to me (here and now), give me the letter from my future or former self, and then I MIGHT believe you time travelled.
I believe it is impossible to prove time travel. Note I said believe verses making statements as if I really know or have proof.
Anyway, because of these wonderful world lines that make it all work and solve any real problems that seem to arise, it is not possible to have proof. It would be on another world line and the person would end up on another line preventing proof from existing where it is needed.
So therefore, they may be many time travelers in our time frame but they know not to mention it or try to convince people of it. The future travelers know of this situation and keep quiet.
Posted by anon_102097 on 11-03-07 @ 10:20 AM
This anonymous post is in response to ATS thread: "How can someone prove to you they have time traveled?"
Hi, just popped in to see what is up.
I have been reading up on remote viewing. This is a natural thing for people to do. Over the course of history, there have been many instances of this. Some more notable instances of this can be found in works such as the Bible. To deny this is truth is not denying ignorance, but rather denying fact.
I have seen this cry for proof as merely someones atempt at denying truth when it is presented.
What would be the gain from disclosure? The people who will accept time travel as reality already know that it is right, because they are people of vision. All great discoveries and technology in use today are the result of visionary thinking.
Here is remote viewing for beginers 101. I for one plan to conciously use 100% of my brain's capacity from here on through the remainder of my time on earth.
If you are trying to deny this exists, your mind will never accept any kind of proof a time traveller could provide. That my friends is logic 101.
We have all of the tools, people of earth, you just need to unlock the tool shed, open it and find out just how incredible the tools you have are.
Originally posted by kanesis
I remeber a friend telling me, that is also beleiver of quantum theory he said to me time travel is the abilty to first project yourself threw time. He said time travel would not be possible unless you could first do it threw you mind and project your self to the time you wished. then i said to myself sounds like its solid. Then i said like butterfly effect the movie he said yes that is the concept. he said but you could not exist in two places at once thats why your mind would need to be there first then your self you physical body would follow.
Just my 2 cents
Originally posted by DJMessiah
One being, if they can provide a full accurate report of what the weather will be like in every capital city of the world for full given year, then this will no doubt remove any doubt.
Originally posted by win 52
That would be fine and dandy, but what if HARP was fired a few times between now and then.