It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Main Entry: in·come
Pronunciation: 'in-"k&m also 'in-k&m or 'i[ng]-k&m
Function: noun
1 : a coming in : ENTRANCE, INFLUX
2 : a gain or recurrent benefit usually measured in money that derives from capital or labor; also : the amount of such gain received in a period of time
Originally posted by alphabetaone
Given all THAT, he is a TRUE American by your own definition.
Elaine's guilty verdicts:
1 count 18 USC 371 CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES
5 counts 26 USC 7201 and 18 USC 2 Tax Evasion, Aiding and Abetting
8 counts 26 USC 7202 and 18 USC 2 Willful Failure to Collect Employment Taxes, Aiding and Abetting
1 count 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Structure Financial Transactions
2 counts 31 USC 5324(a)(3), 5325, 18 USC 2 Structuring Transactions to Evade Reporting Requirements, Aiding and Abetting
Ed's guilty verdicts:
1 count 18 USC 371 CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES
1 count 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Structure Financial Transactions
2 counts 31 USC 5324(a)(3), 5325, 18 USC 2 Structuring Transactions to Evade Reporting
Originally posted by The Big O
Originally posted by BlackOps719
I once heard about some people who, against great odds, decided to defy the powers that be and stood their ground against an oppressive government, and they also hid in the woods with guns (what nutjobs!), they were simple farmers and working men with limited resources who were greatly outnumbered, and they probably had the majority of the people around them saying the same things that you are.
Ever heard of the American Revolution?
Gross over generalization here. The resistance was far more organized than what you described, not just farmers and working men...and the revolution was significantly more complex than just revolting against taxes.
Don't twist history to make it seem to back up what this guy is doing.
-Steve
Originally posted by grimreaper797
Belenus
Main Entry: in·come
Pronunciation: 'in-"k&m also 'in-k&m or 'i[ng]-k&m
Function: noun
1 : a coming in : ENTRANCE, INFLUX
2 : a gain or recurrent benefit usually measured in money that derives from capital or labor; also : the amount of such gain received in a period of time
The bold is very important. Labor is not a gain at all. Its an exchange. You aren't gaining anything in labor, it's an equal trade. If my job is just to do labor, its not income. You can't make a "gain" off of labor, because it's not like a product you are selling.
usually measured in money that derives from capital or labor
Originally posted by FredT
Originally posted by BennyHill
Mr. Ed Brown deserves a round of applause for taking a stand. The income tax is simply being used as a tool to suppress the masses and fund projects to suppress them even further.
What exactly are your taxes used for?
For defence to preserve your right to complain about having to pay taxes
For medicare and other social programs
The roads you are going to use to get tot he guys house to support him etc etc etc etc.
Without a government in place we have nothing but anarchy at the worst or small pockets of people clinging together at best. Without income in the forms of taxes, all that goes away its really that simple.
This guy is like the people who refuse immunizations for thier children. Dependant on us to pay for the freedoms he enjoys :shk:
Originally posted by grimreaper797
That is incorrect. Why do you think they call it trade school? Because its a trade. Why is it called a trade?
Trade by definition is:
an equal exchange. You cannot price labor. Its value is solely determind by some ones desire for such a thing. A corvette has a set value, regardless of how much some one is will to pay for it. Any physical item sold, has a set value which it costs to produce that physical item. Selling it for anymore then what it costed to produce it is profit, or income.
Labor on the other hand, doesn't have a cost to produce it. Its not a material good, and cannot be deemed to have any profit, which is why its considered a trade or an equal exchange. Note the word equal.
[edit on 20-1-2007 by grimreaper797]
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
I just don't get it. And I don't think you do either. This isn't about Ed's convictions in court. This is about Ed's convictions in principle.
the act of giving or taking one thing in return for another.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
definition of labor: The amount of human energy that is expended to produce a product.
In this case if you can tell me how much human energy is worth, what units its meassured in, and how you came about this value for human energy, I will be happy to agree that it can create a profit.
Of course that will never happen as their is no way to calculate how much human energy is worth, and thats a rediculous concept to even fathom. In saying that, how are you going to say whether or not they made a profit or a loss? You can't. You say well your still surviving. Yes but I lost many hours of time during that labor and overall I think I lost more then I gained.
Since there is no tool of meassurement to say how much human energy and a persons time is worth, you can never say they made a profit. Value does not determine profit either, as value varies from person to person. What one person considers a gain, another considers it a loss.