Originally posted by Classified Info
If WTC 7 was allready rigged with explosives what need would there be to fly a jet airliner into it anyway?
Because the masterminds of 9/11 did their homework. They new that bringing down the WTC's with explosives alone, Americans, and the entire world
would scream "INSIDE JOB!". So they needed to make it look more like a "primitive terrorist attack". Something that "a normal terrorist" would
do, "Kamikazi" style, so that they can point the fingers at someone else. The only problem was, WTC 1 and 2 were designed to withstand the impact
of a Boeing 707, and they also figured that a 757 wouldn't quite be enough to take down WTC7. So they rigged them all with explosives to finish the
B.T.W a 707 and a 767 are very simular in impact force.
Anyway, the masterminds of 9/11 knew that a jet alone will not be enough to bring down the towers, so they rigged them with explosives. Since flight
93 was a mission failed, they STILL wanted to get rid of the WTC7 building, so they just went ahead and pulled it.
Silverstien was in on the whole operation from the start. He knew about 9/11 ahead of time. But the only problem was, he thought a jet was going to
hit WTC7. So when he was interviewed and said "pull it", he had made up that whole excuse on the spot, before he was rebriefed by the masterminds
of 9/11 about their new "plan B" since Flight 93 was a SNAFU. He figured he could just say they demolished the building on the spot because there
was so much damage, then later, the masterminds were mad at Silverstien for saying that, so they forced him to lie, and change his story so that it
wouldn't look like an inside job.
A very complicated thing happened on 9/11.
1: The plan was to fly 3 jets into WTC1,2,7 and finish them off with explosives, because the jets are NOT enough to bring them down alone. Silverstien
was prepared for this plan.
2: On 9/11 flight 93 crashed early, which destroyed the original plan. But they blow up WTC7 anyway.
3: Silverstien wasn't sure what to tell the public on his interview, because obviously, they didn't plan for flight 93 to miss its target. So he
made the excuse that they "pulled" WTC7 because of damage, and the fact that so many had already died in WTC 1 and 2, that they didn't want to risk
having WTC7 collapse with people in it, so they controlled the collapse making sure it couldn't hurt anyone later.
4: The masterminds of 9/11 forced Silverstien to change his story. So that it could still fit in to the "big picture" of being a "terrorist
attack", and not an inside job.
People say "The American government couldn't pull an inside job like this without making a mistake, and letting everyone know". Well they are
correct. 9/11 is full of mistakes, waiting for people with balls to notice them.