posted on Jan, 18 2007 @ 09:38 PM
Here's for you, some today and yesterday quotes from this good old Gonzalez.
Specter: Now wait a minute, wait a minute. The Constitution says you can't take it away except in the case of invasion or rebellion. Doesn't
that mean you have the right of habeas corpus?
Gonzales: I meant by that comment that the Constitution doesn't say that every individual in the United States or every citizen has or is assured the
right of habeas corpus. It doesn't say that. It simply says that the right of habeas corpus shall not be suspended.
The Constitution says: The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public
Safety may require it. According to Gonzales, the "Constitution doesn't say that every individual in the United States or every citizen has or is
assured the right of habeas corpus. It doesn't say that. It simply says that the right of habeas corpus shall not be suspended."
Using that logic, the Constitution also says: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise
thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a
redress of grievances. I guess Gonzales would say "the Constitution doesn't say that every citizen of the U.S. has a right freedom of speech or
freedom of religious expression, it just says that Congress can't abridge those rights."
The Constitution says: the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Gonzales would say that "the Constitution doesn't say
that every citizen of the U.S. has a right to keep and bear arms, it just says that the right to bear arms can't be infringed."
The Constitution says: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,
shall not be violated . . . Gonzales would say that "the Constitution doesn't say that citizens have the right to be free from unreasonable searches
and seizures, it just says the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures can't be violated."
Also:
Gonzales says judges generally should defer to the will of the president and Congress when deciding national security cases. He also raps jurists who
"apply an activist philosophy that stretches the law to suit policy preferences."
You have a big, big, big problem just right there. And this guy is the attorney general... So this guy, the attorney GENERAL don't believe in checks
and balance, and clearly want to get rid of it and decide in the constitution what should be or not...