It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What on earth?
CBS: Military Tells Bush It Has Only 9,000 Troops Available For ‘Surge’
A State Department official leaked word this week that President Bush is considering sending “no more than 15,000 to 20,000 U.S. troops” to Iraq. “Instead of a surge, it is a bump,” the official said.
This claim was bolstered last night by CBS’s David Martin, who reported that military commanders have told Bush they are prepared to execute a troop escalation of just 9,000 soldiers and Marines into Iraq, “with another 10,000 on alert in Kuwait and the U.S.”
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
Marg, for a country that has 300 million people in it, our military is not very large. I have heard estimates anywhere from 800,000 to 2 million military personnel. .
Originally posted by marg6043
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
Marg, for a country that has 300 million people in it, our military is not very large. I have heard estimates anywhere from 800,000 to 2 million military personnel. .
You know the reason we are in the place we are right now with the troops is because the cuts to our military by Clinton.
Originally posted by marg6043
You know the reason we are in the place we are right now with the troops is because the cuts to our military by Clinton.
Originally posted by marg6043
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
Marg, for a country that has 300 million people in it, our military is not very large. I have heard estimates anywhere from 800,000 to 2 million military personnel. .
You know the reason we are in the place we are right now with the troops is because the cuts to our military by Clinton.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Maybe so,
But who would of thought during clintons time we would be in such a costly, endless war against a region so enflamed in hatred.
Who brought us to this position?
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
However, we have painted ourselves into a corner that we are not just going to be able to slyly slither out of now. We will either have to fight, unfortunately, or have no where to retreat to. where are we going to retreat to? Sure, we can bring the troops home... Does anyone really think that's going to stop the violence towards America,Americans or America's interests? I seriously doubt it.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Bring the troops home and let Iraq fester into what ever it forms into will for sure, ensure an attack some where down the track.
However, if we keep our men there, the attacks will not cease.
There really is NO answer to this problem thats has been created.
Originally posted by Arcane Demesne
Well...actually, bringing the troops home for two years to let them rest would be a good thing. Let them rest up for the next Pres. to screw us nice an' hard...
Then the 'Allies' could try their thing (after all, they all have the same weaponry) at it. And if the Allies don't think it is in thier interest...well, then that says something about the war in the first place (retarded).
It's like sports, you don't keep a guy in the game the whole time for every game in every season...he'd be useless half-way through after a while. Same with the Military, I suspect.
Originally posted by mel1962
Bush = worst president ever
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
Originally posted by mel1962
Bush = worst president ever
I think I'll let history be the judge of that. However,I will say that from where I am sitting, I think he is certainly one to do what he wants to do, regardless of the ramifications.
When I look at some of the decisions he has made, I see a whole host of things that could happen down the road they may or may not have been intended.