reply to post by Royal76
hhhmmm nice idea, but... would it not be a bit of a long shot sending two people to a new planet with no biological resistance to infections from the
flora and fauna? unless of course the brought all that with them in an ark say just after the dinosaurs died out and earth became inhabitable again..
|
reply to post by rohnds
Rhon, I have to agree 100% to your statement and I agree that as Mars was dying due to the swopping of its magnetic poles we evacuated Mars and
escaped to Earth. I cannot explain how we lost our technology but I can only assume that it would be the same as being marooned on an Island or being
shipwrecked.
The point that I have to make or question shall I say is that if we evolved from the Ape why are there still Apes? That question debunks any theory
of evolution. Mutation on the other hand is the adaption of our Chromosomes' and DNA / Genes that mutate to suite the enviroment, but this does not
change our genetic structure, but only enhances or degrades it.
We as homo-sapians have NOT adapted to living on Earth. We cannot cope with the indigenous bactaria and virus's that kill us, such as Influenza. We
suffer with back pains and other muscular / orthopedic probelms due to Earths larger mass and the stonger gravational force that pulls us towards
Earth's center. The gravity on Mars is exaclty suited to our genetic form. My guess is that if we could find germs or bactaria on Mars they would
not be harmful to us.
The probelm for our future is the prediction of the magnetic pole swop in 2012, which I believe was the cause of Mars' extinction, hopefully we find
a solution before then, or that the Scientists have got their dates wrong.
:- Colin Crafford
|
reply to post by uberarcanist
I believe this: house cats and tigers evolved from ancient feline; donkeys and horses, equine; dogs and foxes, canine; apes and gorillas, primate;
humans and neanderthals, homosapien. I honestly don't think we're related to primates. The one "link" they found looks undeveloped, but still
human to me. Most evoloutionary change involves size, hair, intelligence, colour, not complete mutation. I'm also a little out of the loop, so
forgive me if they've found more convincing "links", but otherwise this is my theory. Another thing I wonder is this: why is humankind so young?
Cat, dog, horse, and ape-kind have been around forever, and you can see the trends in evolutionary changes. We just kinda popped up. So, what? Did we
mass-mutate from monkeys or were we introduced by an alternate method...
And another thing! Lol. I'm not familliar with the weather on Mars, but when I see pics it's jagged rock and sand. When I think sand and rocks I
think of smooth pebbles. Looks more like tons of crushed rocks (maybe from a big explosion?) and sediment that settled from the air.
|
How long has Mars been dead?
Also we can tell how long we have been here on Earth,a big difference!
unless of course Earth was Terraformed for future use Martians and we are the bred forms of our Mars brothers and Sisters this would explain some time
change.
That would also explain our 223 gene differences from chips.
[edit on 9-3-2009 by alansams]
|
reply to post by alansams
...Please don't assume you have total info>>"how long has Mars been dead?"
Sure the info that is currently taught and mis-taught may lead one to conclude that life would be sparse or non-existent on Mars today.This is the
worst dis-service since life is abundant on Mars,just info mis-handled.There are live people and animals on Mars,today.
This pic I mirror-imaged to "doctor" to fullness.
Many Mars animals have large dark eyes.This one is just closer to human.
You may see what's in one of these five pics,but others can
see five out of five,so don't assume you see or know that Mars is or was dead. That would be like spitting out a gulp of sea water and assuming all
water from large bodies is salty. Sure MOST of the water on Earth is salty,but not all. Sure most of Mars LOOKS
dead on the surface,but there were fossils and life found at all the landers and rovers locations we sent there so far.Nasa has their own agenda and
the truth can wait.Meanwhile generations are mis-taught and mis-lead,even though we paid for the science,and are denied the results.Disclosure has not
yet come. Here's an exaple of having to colorize and boost the info from available sparse info...so interpretive as to be disclaimed.If you look
very hard you still won't see what I see.
Even though you can't see them all,you probably can
see some faces,and that means life on Mars . How long
have you lived in happy ignorance?
|
