It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Silverstein say's when he said "pull it" he meant the firefighters in WTC7

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 17 2007 @ 07:46 PM
link   
The insurmountable problem with this explanation of Silverstein's statement is that there were no firefighters inside WTC 7.

Silverstein clears up what he meant when he said "PULL IT".
January 5 2006





Silverstein Answers WTC Building 7 Charges
Says "pull it" meant to evacuate firefighters, but there were no firefighters in the building

Paul Joseph Watson | January 5 2006

After nearly two years of steadfast silence, Silverstein Properties have finally responded to questions about what Larry Silverstein meant when he told a PBS documentary that WTC Building 7 was "pulled" in the late afternoon of September 11 2001.

Building 7 occupied a city block immediately north of the World Trade Center complex. Photos taken minutes before its collapse show small fires on two or three floors. Building 7 became only the third steel building in history before or since 9/11 to collapse from fire damage. The other two were the North and South towers of the World Trade Center.
www.prisonplanet.com... ersteinanswers.htm

[edit on 17-1-2007 by atsrules]

[edit on 17-1-2007 by atsrules]




posted on Jan, 17 2007 @ 07:59 PM
link   
He said 'Pull it, then you seen the building come down" is what he said.

Also wasn't convinient that none of the I-Beams needed to be cut to size to fit on the 40' truckbeds, they were all amazingly about 40' fett long to fit perfectly on the truckbeds.

Also you can see that the beams were cut at a 45 degree angle with Thermite, just like they fall and cut down a tree.



posted on Jan, 17 2007 @ 08:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by PHARAOH1133
He said 'Pull it, then you seen the building come down" is what he said.

Also wasn't convinient that none of the I-Beams needed to be cut to size to fit on the 40' truckbeds, they were all amazingly about 40' fett long to fit perfectly on the truckbeds.

Also you can see that the beams were cut at a 45 degree angle with Thermite, just like they fall and cut down a tree.


No

he said "firedepartment commander
telling me that they were not sure they would be able to contain the fire

i said you know, we've had such terrible loss of life
maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it

and they made that decision to pull

and we watched the building collapse"

www.youtube.com...


What's funny about this is that Silverstein himself said "maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it"
- how did he know the building was "pullable", meaning it could be pulled, meaning it was planted with explosives to demolish it
- he say's "they made the decision to pull", obviously Silverstein is talking about a higher authority then himself who he had direct contact with during the morning of 9/11
- "we" watched the building collapse. meaning after they made the decision to pull it and it was agreed on by the higher authority he was speaking to, silverstein and this higher authority watched the building collapse


This says it all.


[edit on 17-1-2007 by atsrules]

[edit on 17-1-2007 by atsrules]



posted on Jan, 17 2007 @ 08:15 PM
link   
he was even lying about talking to the firedepartment commander. They put out fires, they don't demolish buildings. The fire department "commander?", i thought it was fire department "chief". Obviously it was the commander of the 911 operation.



posted on Jan, 17 2007 @ 08:18 PM
link   
This whole mishap with the plane crashing in pennsylvania, and silversteins slip up of saying pull wtc7, the fact that wtc7 was pullable that day, all explains why cheney and the guy next to him seemed to look guilty and uneasy in the video of the state of the union.



posted on Jan, 18 2007 @ 01:36 AM
link   
Silverstein had no authority to tell anyone what to do with firmen or building.

The only reason the fire chief was calling was a courtasy call to tell him that they could not save the builidng. This was after the firemen had already been moved out fo the building and the safety zone.



posted on Jan, 18 2007 @ 01:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Silverstein had no authority to tell anyone what to do with firemen or building.

The only reason the fire chief was calling was a courtesy call to tell him that they could not save the building. This was after the firemen had already been moved out of the building and the safety zone.


You're dismissing the fact that WTC7 was NOT hit by an airplane, yet it fell exactly the same way as the twin towers.

Even if it was a courtesy call, you can NOT pull a building without first wiring it with explosives to demolish it into its own footprint. Demolition men know that a building has to be wired in such a fashion that it blows up in a certain sequence so that the building falls into the middle of itself.

Some may say that debri from the Twin towers hit WTC7 can caused it to fall which is complete bulldoodoo. If a piece of rock falling of the Towers were to hit WTC7 the most damage that could be done is the side of the building being damaged from concrete/concrete colliding together. It would NOT cause the building to collapse.

It's funny that on 9/11 the terrorists were able to create magical jet fuel fires that turned the tallest skyscrapers in NYC into a dust. And it's farfetched that pieces of the twin tower's defied gravity, jumped a few block's into WTC7. First of all, the tower's fell into their own imprint, how could pieces of debri fly a few block's out into WTC7 and then cause that building to fall the same way. No plane hit WTC7 yet it fell the same way.

It's funny because some very brave soul's took over the plane that crashed over Pennsylvania. There are reports that that plane only had a few peices left in the crash site. Supposedly it was shot out of the sky by our own army following their orders. In fact if you had half a brain you can see that the plane that crashed in pennsylvania was meant to hit WTC7, thus the reason they "pulled" it. Thus the reason it was even wired.

WTC7 was rigged with explosives, and we know that because flying debri from the tower's doesn't make a building as big as WTC7 fall in a controlled demolition style.

---The people who planned 9/11 failed to carry out the attack perfectly.
Pennsylvania crash was meant for WTC7


Look at it this way.
Tower's 1 and 2 were perfectly hit.
The pentagon was perfectly hit.
However one of the plane's crashed into the floor?
Seem's like a mess up to me. Someone who carried out this simalteanous attack would not be stupid enough to mess up. However they did, and that's why the truth is spreading. They messed up because WTC7 did not get struck with a airplane and fall as it was intended to do. It doesn't matter if Silverstein got a call from the firedepartment. They couldn't have knocked that building to pieces without a demolition squad period. Flying debrie does not cause a building to come down.

This is the real world, forget the official story, it's complete balony.



posted on Jan, 18 2007 @ 10:07 AM
link   
This is another theory i have a problem with

site:controlled-demolition.com pull

paste that into google and read what CDI has to say.


Wasnt silverstien at home at the time of WTC7s collapse? not sure on this but i think he was, and running on that string of logic, could the "we" in his statement maybe be pertaining to his wife?

Besides all of this..how many people have seen documentaries detailing controlled demolition using shaped charges?

I know i have seen a few on discovery as of late. it takes 100s of pounds of shaped charges to blow small buildings and bridges. how much would it to blow the wtc's? thousands? and the wiring alone to keep the charges in sequence is immense. Do youreally believe that a demo team was in these buildings fora few short days (with people inside and working) and rigged 3 buildings with no one noticing? dont you have to drill into core columns and such for those types of demo's to work?



posted on Jan, 18 2007 @ 04:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by atsrules
Even if it was a courtesy call, you can NOT pull a building without first wiring it with explosives to demolish it into its own footprint. Demolition men know that a building has to be wired in such a fashion that it blows up in a certain sequence so that the building falls into the middle of itself.



Well with the reported damage to WTC 7 from the structural damage to the fires gutting the floors, it would not have taken much to bring the building down. Thier are several ways to bring down a building, thier were demo and excavation crews on the scene.

Yes the official story has a lot of holes in it.



new topics




 
0

log in

join