It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Sovereignty is irrelevant in war.
Whether the government attacked is recognized or not is irrelevant.
Irrelevant. Nations don't have to wait to be attacked before a war is legal.
That would be a poor arguement, and is irrelevant to whether or not the war was legal.
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
I dont mean to seem rude, but your an American and you write in broken English. I have such a difficult time reading your posts marg that they dont even seem coherent. This is one of the problems in our country, not the war in Iraq. I dont think you should be able to obtain citizenship unless you can write something in English that isn't broken nearly to the point of an incoherant childish rant.
Originally posted by DontTreadOnMe
I haven't read through your entire post yet.
But a thought does come to mind. Why should we be bound by the UN and its international law? Many feel the UN is a useless dinosaur that ever really lived up to its potential. Many feel it serves no purpose at all.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
How many Iraqi's do you beleive look at the USA and says'
'' its irrelevant, that they found NO WMDS, its irrelevant IRAQ didnt attack them, its irrelevant SADDAM IS DEAD, but osama is alive, Its irrelevant War ended in 2003, yet hundereds of thousands continue to die, its irrelevant that the 'evidence' presented AGAINST Iraq has since been proven as LIES ''