This topic is in the War On Terrorism discussion forum.  (rss)


Senior CIA offical fired for refusing to falsify Iraq WMD intelligence




Topic started on 17-1-2007 @ 08:44 AM by 11Bravo


This isnt a new story but I havent seen it here at ATS.
I just read in USA Today that U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler ruled that the case may go forward. Evidently she believes in the merit of the case.
Honesty gets CIA official fired

This proves that there are some good honest people working for the feds, but it also shows that honesty and integrity are relics of the past and have no place in government.

The sad thing is that there are still people, even on this board, that believe there were WMD in Iraq.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-1-2007 @ 09:03 PM by Liberal1984


Sadly no way can morality suit Darwinism in the 21st century society (generally). But you have a point when you to point to government as a prime example.

The thing I’ve never understood is why do people resign when they’ve witnessed something morally wrong in government. Surely you can do far more damage to the enemy by staying inside; and that is obviously what this guy did write. By staying inside, and forcing them to fire him, he may now get a handsome sum of compensation for unfair dismissal.
Had he just chosen to go, there would be no case, and so chances are we the public wouldn’t even be hearing about it.

Anybody who is government should fight all the way when it comes to morality. Otherwise you may as well do nothing at all, bide your time, and learn some more. I know that sometimes people are led to believe that if they resign over a moral issue it will be better for their career reputation; all I can saw is that there are plenty of examples to show that the immoral very rarely honour these kinds of deals (unless they are legally binding).



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-1-2007 @ 09:47 PM by EastCoastKid


Since the run-up to the invation of Iraq in 2003, I have spent more time defending the CIA than anyone else.

lol

Imagine that.

Alot of good, well-meaning people have been drummed out b/c of this criminally insane administration.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-1-2007 @ 10:07 PM by GT100FV



Originally posted by 11Bravo

The sad thing is that there are still people, even on this board, that believe there were WMD in Iraq.



The question isn't whether there were WMD in Iraq. The question is what happened to the WMD, and when did it happen. Something happened to it- either being destroyed, hidden, or moved elsewhere. Where and how long ago would be what I want to know.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-1-2007 @ 11:22 PM by EastCoastKid



Originally posted by GT100FV

Originally posted by 11Bravo

The sad thing is that there are still people, even on this board, that believe there were WMD in Iraq.



The question isn't whether there were WMD in Iraq. The question is what happened to the WMD, and when did it happen. Something happened to it- either being destroyed, hidden, or moved elsewhere. Where and how long ago would be what I want to know.


DUH.

They were disposed of in the wake of the Gulf War (aka 1990s).

Do a google search on Scott Ritter. Read him. That's pretty much all you need to know.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:












ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

(no tags)
















ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.082 seconds
7 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread