It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

According to CNN 1 Israeli died on 9/11

page: 7
1
<< 4  5  6    8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 05:18 PM
link   
You might not agree with me but as the years pass more and more people including experts are stating the Israel pulled off 9/11.

We can not depend on the mainstream media to report the truth about Israel and its connection to 9/11 because they mainstream media does not even report the truth on Israeli Apartheid.

Here is a video of a brave expert who took a chance and explored the link between Israeli terrorism and the crime of 9/11.



I know you are resistant now spoor but I think I can convince you just how evil Israel is and that 9/11 is exactly the sort of thing they love to do.



Originally posted by spoor

Originally posted by BRAVO949
we should be open to discussing Israel's involvement in the crime of 9/11.


As they were not involved any "discussion" you want is just a hate filled spew against jews, not based on any evidence or facts.




posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 06:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by BRAVO949
but I think I can convince you just how evil Israel is and that 9/11 is exactly the sort of thing they love to do.


All you have done here is convinced everyone you have a pathological hatred for jews and Israel, and try and blame them for everything.

There is zero evidence linking Israel to 9/11, but your blind hatred for jews forces you to ignore that fact and blames them anyway.



posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 06:01 PM
link   
Just goes to show the even "experts" will buy into conspiracy theories. One of your previous posts was so full of....inaccuracies...that it is easy to see why you believe the things you do. Is Israel innocent? No more so than the rest of our allies. Did they plan/execute 9/11? No.


And before you ask, one of your falsehoods was the assertion that ole Larry arranged for special terrorism insurance. That's an out and out lie.



posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 08:25 PM
link   
"ole Larry" isn't your grandfather or anything, is he?

"ole Larry" - Larry Silverstein the radical Zionist admitted on a PBS special that he called for the destruction of WTC Building 7, though, right?

Here is Zayde Larry Silverstein and all about him. The video says "he re-worked the insurance policy."



No Israeli piloted plane hit Building 7 - I admit that.


Originally posted by vipertech0596
Just goes to show the even "experts" will buy into conspiracy theories. One of your previous posts was so full of....inaccuracies...that it is easy to see why you believe the things you do. Is Israel innocent? No more so than the rest of our allies. Did they plan/execute 9/11? No.


And before you ask, one of your falsehoods was the assertion that ole Larry arranged for special terrorism insurance. That's an out and out lie.

edit on 3-12-2011 by BRAVO949 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 08:55 PM
link   
reply to post by BRAVO949
 


And again, relying on innuendo and lies.

Silverstein tried to buy LESS insurance for the complex. His bankers forced him to buy more. In addition his policy had not even been issued on 9/11/01. All he had was the rider which the insurance companies agreed to abide by......before the legal fights started.

In addition, insurance companies paid for the damages suffered in the 1993 attack.



posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 09:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by BRAVO949
Larry Silverstein the radical Zionist admitted on a PBS special that he called for the destruction of WTC Building 7, though, right?[/QUOTE]

Wrong, just another of your many lies. care to show the exact quote you are talking about?

No, I did not think you could, just another of your hate filled anti jew posts.



posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 09:27 PM
link   
Are you some kind of insurance expert?

Really, I am asking you if you know about insurance policies?

What do you mean by "rider"?

Are you saying the banks allowed him to take possession without insurance?

Isn't that a bit risky?

Are you sure of your facts in this case?


Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by BRAVO949
 


And again, relying on innuendo and lies.

Silverstein tried to buy LESS insurance for the complex. His bankers forced him to buy more. In addition his policy had not even been issued on 9/11/01. All he had was the rider which the insurance companies agreed to abide by......before the legal fights started.

In addition, insurance companies paid for the damages suffered in the 1993 attack.

edit on 3-12-2011 by BRAVO949 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 09:42 PM
link   
spoor - I really wish we, you and me, did not live in a world in which Israel carried out horrible crimes against Christians, Muslims and Jews. I really wish I could accept Israel as just any other Asian country but the murder and Apartheid - I can not overlook that.

Now, here we have a German gentleman talking about 9/11.

Germans are fine people, very well respected around the world. People like Germans. Germans are honest. Everyone loves their cars and Israel's Merkava could not move or fire without great German technology. Not saying that Merkava should move or fire, however.

He does not say that Israel pulled off 9/11 in this video but as far as I know he has said it before.

He is smart, yes?






Originally posted by spoor

Originally posted by BRAVO949
Larry Silverstein the radical Zionist admitted on a PBS special that he called for the destruction of WTC Building 7, though, right?[/QUOTE]

Wrong, just another of your many lies. care to show the exact quote you are talking about?

No, I did not think you could, just another of your hate filled anti jew posts.



posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 09:44 PM
link   
reply to post by BRAVO949
 


I'm positive. I've done the research, rather than relying on conspiracy sites.



posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 09:52 PM
link   
So you are not an expert on insurance?

You are admitting that?

Can you tell us all what a rider is?

Does your statement that includes the term "rider" make any sense?


Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by BRAVO949
 


I'm positive. I've done the research, rather than relying on conspiracy sites.



posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 11:10 PM
link   
Excuse me, I got my words switched around. The Policy was still being negotiated, the insurance companies agreed to abide by the binder agreement.


www.nytimes.com...





edit on 3-12-2011 by vipertech0596 because: (no reason given)

edit on 3-12-2011 by vipertech0596 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 12:05 AM
link   
Well,

at least you will admit that you were wrong about that detail.





Originally posted by vipertech0596
Excuse me, I got my words switched around. The Policy was still being negotiated, the insurance companies agreed to abide by the binder agreement.


www.nytimes.com...





edit on 3-12-2011 by vipertech0596 because: (no reason given)

edit on 3-12-2011 by vipertech0596 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 12:20 AM
link   
reply to post by BRAVO949
 


When I make a mistake, I own up to it.

And in this case, it makes the notion that Silverstein had anything to do with the attack that much more ridiculous. Willingly destroy property you are renting, without knowing if you will be covered? And don't bother to mention the "pull it" comment. That one has been demolished on here too many times.
edit on 4-12-2011 by vipertech0596 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 01:14 AM
link   
Viper - "without knowing if you will be covered?"

A bound policy is coverage.

This detail does not prove Silverstein was in on the crime of 9/11 or not but you can not say he did not know he had coverage unless he knew nothing about insurance.

So, since you seem to be interested in insurance if not an expert what was the exact workding of Zionist Larry "pull it" Silverstein's insurance policy?

Have you ever seen a copy of the policy?

I have not. I have heard that his lease agreement stipulated that in case the buildings were destroyed I could rebuild.

Is that true?

I don't know if that is true or not. Would sure like to know though because they is a very odd sounding clause.

Did he have extra insurance for terrorism? Or, it that a myth?

We do know that Larry is and was a Zionist.

Again you seem to know a whole lot about 9/11 so maybe you can confirm or deny the claim that Larry Silverstein was a personal friend of Benjamin Netanyahu as well as Ehud Barak.

You must know this but I will supply is for the rest of the world reading these posts. Both of those men were in the in the vaunted Israeli commando unti Sayeret Matkal. The unit that would be used to carry out something like the crimes of 9/11.

Just a coincidence that a former Sayeret Matkal officer by the name of Daniel Lewin was on Flight 11 and a Hebrew accent can be heard on the recording played to the 9/11 Commission.

According the the flight attendant former Sayeret Matkal officer Daniel Lewin was shot of stabbed during the hijacking.

Does he fit into the whole Sayeret Matkal connection to 9/11 or was he a would be hero?

Should we guess that a fairly young proud Israeli ass-kicker commando had his ass kicker by a couple of amateurs?

Keeping these facts in mind and the fact that the Israeli international shipping company Zim broke its lease and moved out days before the "attack" and that 200 Israelis were arrested just before and after 9/11 - no wonder experts implicate Israel.


Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by BRAVO949
 


When I make a mistake, I own up to it.

And in this case, it makes the notion that Silverstein had anything to do with the attack that much more ridiculous. Willingly destroy property you are renting, without knowing if you will be covered? And don't bother to mention the "pull it" comment. That one has been demolished on here too many times.
edit on 4-12-2011 by vipertech0596 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 01:21 AM
link   
reply to post by BRAVO949
 


And again you resort to innuendo and falsehoods. No, the insurance companies did NOT have to honor it. The policy was still being negotiated and was not in force.

And it was also pointed out that Zim, did not break their lease and still had employees and computer systems in the towers when they were attacked. The loss of the computers meant Zim had to briefly cease operations.........and yet, you still try to use it as "proof" of Israeli involvement.
edit on 4-12-2011 by vipertech0596 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 02:09 AM
link   
I think you better check into what a bound policy is.

Of course the insurance company had to pay.

Larry's whole story about why he was away that day and why his kids were away is a bit of a coincedence too, isn't it?

Some day in the future all of you Zionists will be bragging about this false-flag operation - if Israel still exists of course.

You have to hand it to Netanyahu and his thug buddies. They were willing to bet the farm on not being blamed for pulling off 9/11.

Don't worry, I am just one voice here. I probably can not convince the world that Israel did 9/11 but I feel compelled to make a good try of it.

The fact you try to counter my posts probably makes others just suspect Israel even more, you know?


Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by BRAVO949
 


And again you resort to innuendo and falsehoods. No, the insurance companies did NOT have to honor it. The policy was still being negotiated and was not in force.

And it was also pointed out that Zim, did not break their lease and still had employees and computer systems in the towers when they were attacked. The loss of the computers meant Zim had to briefly cease operations.........and yet, you still try to use it as "proof" of Israeli involvement.
edit on 4-12-2011 by vipertech0596 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 04:49 AM
link   
reply to post by BRAVO949
 


I sure hope that your hate keeps you warm. Of course, it's also going to burn you out. I cannot help itif others believe your lies, all I can do is to continue to point out the facts.



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 12:09 PM
link   
reply to post by BRAVO949
 





If you mean a small group of radical Zionsts run Israel and the US then I agree with you.


'Small"?

The US and Brits created Israel specifically for them to act in this role.



An important point is that this same group is draining the resources of the US to prop up Israel.


Or, their intent is much greater than that. You don't really believe the people who funded Israel's creation think of national boundaries in the same way we do, do you? Unless you're a Billionaire who frequents the likes of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Bilderberger meetings, how do you know what their motives are?




Well over 100,000 American troops have been injured in wars for Israel.



Well over 100,000 brainwashed people agreed to help destroy the lives and territory of people on the other side of the planet whose only crimes were to be in the way. I feel sorry for their victims, not those who sold their humanity for a cheap lie about duty and country, or to help pay for college.




I think we should all be upset by that fact and we should be open to discussing Israel's involvement in the crime of 9/11.


Agreed, but why stop at Israel when the path to the implicated leads elsewhere too?


In 1989 President George H. W. Bush began the multi-billion dollar Project Hammer program using an investment strategy to bring about the economic destruction of the Soviet Union including the theft of the Soviet treasury, the destabilization of the ruble, funding a KGB coup against Gorbachev in August 1991 and the seizure of major energy and munitions industries in the Soviet Union. Those resources would subsequently be turned over to international bankers and corporations. On November 1, 2001, the second operative in the Bush regime, President George W. Bush, issued Executive Order 13233 on the basis of “national security” and

Source


Initially, it is difficult to see a pattern to the destruction of September 11th other than the total destruction of the World Trade Center, a segment of the Pentagon, four commercial aircraft and the loss of 2,993 lives. However, if the perceived objective of the attack is re-defined from its commonly suggested ‘symbolic’ designation as either ‘a terrorist attack’ or a ‘new Pearl Harbor,’ and one begins by looking at it as purely a crime with specific objectives (as opposed to a political action), there is a compelling logic to the pattern of destruction. This article provides research into the early claims by Dick Eastman, Tom Flocco, V.K. Durham and Karl Schwarz that the September 11th attacks were meant as a cover-up for financial crimes being investigated by the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), whose offices in the Pentagon were destroyed on September 11th.1 After six years of research, this report presents corroborating evidence which supports their claims, and proposes a new rationale for the September 11th attacks. In doing so, many of the anomalies – or inconvenient facts surrounding this event - take on a meaning that is consistent with the claims of Eastman et al. The hypothesis of this report is: the attacks of September 11th were intended to cover-up the clearing of $240 billion dollars in securities covertly created in September 1991 to fund a covert economic war against the Soviet Union, during which ‘unknown’ western investors bought up much of the Soviet industry, with a focus on oil and gas. The attacks of September 11th also served to derail multiple Federal investigations away from crimes associated with the 1991 covert operation. In doing so, the attacks were justified under the cardinal rule of intelligence: “protect your resources”2 and consistent with a modus operandi of sacrificing lives for a greater cause.

Source

Leslie Raphael exposed the Naudet piece as a propaganda film, and also names names within the NYPD, FDNY, OEM, Mayor's office and more.



Step 1 : anyone interested in 9/11, no matter what your views on who did it, should already have a DVD copy of the film "9/1...

Whoever you think was behind 9/11, we can agree a major aspect of it is government propaganda, and a major aspect of that, since the days of Eisenstein and Riefenstahl, has been film. This article is about named individuals who had roles to play in that part of 9/11, who knew what was going to happen, knew thousands were going to be killed, did nothing about it and have probably never had one twinge of conscience ever since. They didn't kill anybody, but their foreknowledge makes them legally liable. Reading this is a necessary step on the long road towards making them pay for it.

Source



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 01:42 PM
link   
9/11 MADNESS
post removed because of personal attacks

Click here to learn more about this warning.



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 04:31 PM
link   
reply to post by BRAVO949
 


Yeah, the Zionists killed Brits and Americans with impunity, because they're protected by the Brits and Americans. All part of the same team.



new topics

top topics



 
1
<< 4  5  6    8  9 >>

log in

join