It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by shooterbrody
Why is it every time I turn on the news there are stories about the growing insurgancy in Iraq, and how they are causing so much problems for our military.
Do any of you think the people of the United States would be any less effective against the same miltary forces? We are talking about the same occupational situation with an oppressive military force aren't we. I constantly read posts here on ATS about how if it was my family killed or my children starving I would fight just like the insergents do. Just like over there it would be a fight to the death and just like over there our people here would rise up against the injustice. Is it easier over there to make a car bomb or strap explosives to ones self?
Originally posted by Jessicamsa
Strapping explosives to oneself is counterproductive. Kill yourself and you're no longer there to fight.
billybones82
Armed Resistance a JOKE!
If anyone believes an armed uprising of the people is possible needs to be committed for psychological examination.
Originally posted by billybones82
If anyone believes an armed uprising of the people is possible needs to be committed for psychological examination. First off, most of the firearms we are allowed to own are of relatively low caliber in comparison to the next generation of military equipment used by the armed forces today. Our bullets would have little hope of penetrating the body armor worn by our soldiers. Second, the abilities of governemt surveillance and recon organizations is so advanced that even assembling a large enough group together to plan such a defense/attack let alone actually execute it would be near impossible. Last, most civilians could'nt even survive let alone fight without government help. Most people cant track wild game or survive off the land. An overwhelming majority "need" government and corporate intervention just to continue living. Armed Resistance? Armed suicide sounds more feasible. Much quicker and less painful.
Originally posted by Nexus
Despite the fact that their is a ridicilous amount of weaponary in the United Staes, an armed resistance is ridicilous. Do Americans have explosives that they can use against their military? Do they have the amount of ammuntion that it will take to fight back?
No they don't have explosives. The difference between the USA and Iraq, is that their are countires neighbouring Iraq that are supplying it with wepaons and explosives, Canada isn't going to do the same for US citizens.
If US citizens wished to fight back, they'd need a lot of ammuniton to do so, and during martial law, 'gun shops' (whatever they're called) would be closed to avoid even more selling of weapons. This would cut off ammunition, and their are no neighbouring countries to the USA that could supply it's resistance with ammunition.
And then they'd have to fight the highly equiped US military, it's troops, it's tanks, and it's air force, the most highly eqipied military in the world.
Good luck with that.
Originally posted by shooterbrody
It's easy enough to say that you would go out all guns blazing, but as the OP said; when the police come kicking down your door, are you actually going to grab your gun and fight them? I can't see it happening much.
Originally posted by shooterbrody
not to be nit picky or anything......
native americans had nothing remotely resembling the concept of property ownership
The myth of successful armed resistance in the US in case of martial law. When I read some of the post here on ATS and others forums about martial law in the US, I always see posts that are claiming that if martial law is ever declared all over the country, the people will fight and it's gonna be worse than in Iraq. In Iraq, most of the casualties inflicted to the US army are made by IEDs and suicide bombers, not with guns.
In the US, there's 80 millions guns owners, but of those, how much would fight or keep their firearms when the police/military kick their doors and take them like they Did in New Orleans?
But let's make a comparison with Iraq. In Iraq, under Saddam, almost every home had at least 1 gun. Iraq's population was 26 millions in 2005, that means they had at least 20 millions guns, they were armed to the teeth... and who fought and overthrown Saddam, a dictatorship? Not a lot of people.
In the US, the police state is growing little by little, making lists of “possible threats” including people protesting against the war and political enemies . . Putting cameras all over the place, like in schools, manipulating kids and giving them good behavior drugs or even spy on their own students. They start early to manipulate them by fingerprinting 5 years old kids or banning typical school games or even taking DNA at birth.
For the adults, spying on citizens by listening to them . . New technology to “detect violent behavior” or more technology for police to scan car license-plates that would help localize someone. They admit they breach your privacy and will soon force you to have the ID card . .
It's hard in Iraq because the technological police state wasn't there FIRST. In the USA, it will be there and fully functional when the crap hit the fan. The only way to fight will be in the wild side of the country, and those inside the cities will be under total control. That's why the fight against a police state must be won at the 2008 elections, because do you imagine 8 more years of push for a police state? And to prepare or work to avoid this day, what will you do?
What is really wrong with a NATIONAL ID card? I mean, everyone has a social security card. You cannot work without one. You cannot open a bank account without one. You cannot file a tax return without one. You cannot get credit without one. Why are people worrying about a NATIONAL ID card when we already have one, and have had it since 1935? This sounds like a phony issue to me. A NON issue. Merely a TALKING point.
And if you’ll let me do a little electioneering, let me remind you that the Republicans are 11.5 on a scale of 10 to KILL you and the Dems are 4 on a scale of 10, so the choice of the lesser of the evils presents!