Million doller question..., page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 16-1-2007 @ 12:32 PM by Iwasneverhere
Originally posted by Dragonlike
Atoms are not material.


By the way, have you prooved the ''big bang'' theory or just make asssumptions. I am asking that many prestigeous scientist, none to speak the truth, haven't proved ''big bang'' is the only ultimate theory ofcreation. Becouse such theories are to be earnt n schools doesn't mean absulute that it is right. Schools only learn us a way to move our thought.

Peace


actually the big bang is very easy to prove. un plug your cable connection from your tv while it is on. what do you get. static. not just static. but static thats billions of years old. the tv dont just make that itself. nor does a radio or any other static you hear. its cosmic bacground radiation. Proof of the big bang


reply posted on 17-1-2007 @ 02:48 AM by Dragonlike
quote: Originally posted by ferretman2
Is the universe really expanding?




Yes it is....

skyserver.sdss.org...


I am not here to deny any theories in science, but to express my opinion:

How is possible to say ''universe is expanding'' without having a steady point to see it. For astronomers, their steady point is earth. That's the flaw. Earth moves as well as universe do.

I will give you an example concerning phusics:
A train is leaving the station's platform. The observer is watching the train as it leaves. When we place the observer inside the train, he will watch the station's platform as it leaves!

My answer is this:
What's astronomers stand point in an infinite moving space-room?


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 07:26 PM by Resinveins
reply to post by kokoro



I also tend to think that one of these theories is correct... the problem is.... which one?

I sort of like the recollapsing theory just for the sake of symmetry
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^