It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Regenmacher
Over 4.5 Billion people could die from Global Warming-related causes by 2012
A recent scientific theory called the "hydrate hypothesis" says that historical global warming cycles have been caused by a feedback loop, where melting permafrost methane clathrates (also known as "hydrates") spur local global warming, leading to further melting of clathrates and bacterial growth.
Please visit the link provided for the complete story.
It would devastate the planet. Climatologists now know that Toba blasted so much ash and sulphur dioxide into the stratosphere that it blocked out the sun, causing the Earth's temperature to plummet. Some geneticists now believe that this had a catastrophic effect on human life, possibly reducing the population on Earth to just a few thousand people. Mankind was pushed to the edge of extinction.
Source
Originally posted by shots
I sure do wish the scientific comunity could get their acts together. Just last week they said it would be caused by a super volvcano not global warming
It would devastate the planet. Climatologists now know that Toba blasted so much ash and sulphur dioxide into the stratosphere that it blocked out the sun, causing the Earth's temperature to plummet. Some geneticists now believe that this had a catastrophic effect on human life, possibly reducing the population on Earth to just a few thousand people. Mankind was pushed to the edge of extinction.
Source
Note it states the temperature will plummet which means it will get cold
Originally posted by loam
Come on, Shots, are you serious? The two stories are unrelated.
Flu Viruses May Be Preserved in Ice for Millennia
Influenza viruses may be preserved in glaciers and Arctic ice for thousands of years and released into the environment when the frozen water is thawed, potentially touching off lethal pandemics, researchers said.
Global warming may speed the release of the microbes, increasing the frequency of outbreaks, according to a study in the December issue of the Journal of Virology. The study is based on tests of water and ice from three lakes in Siberia, where large populations of migratory waterfowl breed before traveling to North America, southern Asia, Europe and Africa.
..."One expectation in relation to this phenomenon would be an increased rate of release of these microbes during times of global, or local, warming events and a decrease during cooler periods," said the authors, led by Gang Zhang from Ohio's Bowling Green State University.
***
Climate change linked to health problems
In an area of climate change science with many uncertainties, researchers are piecing together the increasing risks of infectious diseases, food poisoning and water contamination as Canada gets hotter.
West Nile virus and Lyme disease are two examples of illnesses that could be spreading in Canada because of global warming. However, health officials are also keeping an eye on the progression of tropical diseases such as malaria and dengue fever to ensure they won't be able to creep north.
"Over the longer period, if a milder climate is sustained in Canada, then there is a possibility that these types of diseases could be introduced and established," said Dr. Paul Sockett, an infectious disease expert at the Public Health Agency of Canada.
***
Experts say global warming could spread disease
"When there are extreme weather events like flooding, researchers are finding new strains of E. coli," he said. "And with soils warming up on the west coast, researchers have found some funguses that are carrying diseases."
Originally posted by Regenmacher
We have went from the maintream view that there's is no global warming to yes there is global warming, but we can't do anything about it. Neither of those modes of thought will change our lifestyles towards a better world for our kids. Thus, I conclude we need more moderate assements of climate change based on proven methods, rather than extremisms that promote more polarization and stagnation than actual change.
Originally posted by soficrow
Is it just a better marketing strategy? Better control of the media?
Or is it just because there are big profits in 'First Strikes,' and no profit in climate and health prevention strategies?
Originally posted by Regenmacher
Massive population reduction by way of war is the most likely method we shall use to reduce global warming and disease. Not sure what else you expect from those in power, cause they have used that same method to resolve huge problems since the dawn of civilization.
People are still too complacent and/or easily fooled in regards to war as a means too.
World War I World War II
Affected States 36 62
Deaths 10 M 62 M
Injured 20 M 35 M
Conscripts 70 M 110 M
Originally posted by apex
Even with nuclear technology, do you think that 4.5 billion is likely?