It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Follow the Money?

page: 1

log in


posted on Jan, 15 2007 @ 02:13 PM
link" border=0>

Revealed: US comptroller says US taxes would have to double to pay for Bush budget in 2040

In an overlooked hearing last Thursday, the head of a government watchdog agency warned of looming disaster for America's economy if an effort isn't made to control spending, RAW STORY has learned. Adding that decision-makers in Washington suffer from "tunnel vision and "myopia," he said that getting the budget under control could even require steep tax increases if action isn't taken now.

"The picture I will lay out for you today is not a pretty one and it’s getting worse with the passage of time," said David M. Walker, Comptroller General of the United States, in a Thursday morning hearing of the Senate's Budget Committee. "Continuing on our current fiscal path would gradually erode, if not suddenly damage, our economy, our standard of living, and ultimately even our domestic tranquility and our national security," he warned.


The head of the GAO also warned that if no action is taken now to control government spending, severe tax hikes could be necessary. He stated that, "balancing the budget in 2040 could require actions as large as cutting total federal spending by 60 percent or raising federal taxes to 2 times today’s level."


I particularly love this line:

Reuters, the only major news agency to offer coverage of Thursday's hearing...

Notwithstanding all of the above, this thread isn't really about any of that!

What really caught my eye was the following:

During the course of the hearing, senators also asked Walker about the cost estimates presented by President George W. Bush for sending 21,500 more troops to Iraq this year, according to Air Force Times. Walker believed that the amount of money planned to be spent on the troop escalation was much more than needed for the number of troops involved. "I have some serious concerns about the numbers...It is unclear what much of the $5.6 billion is to be spent on," they reported him saying.


Definitely worth further investigation, imo.

posted on Jan, 15 2007 @ 05:21 PM
Good thread. Worth watching.

I anticipate your updates.

posted on Jan, 15 2007 @ 06:10 PM
Following the AirForce Times article mentioned above:

Comptroller: Surge costs don’t add up

“I have some serious concerns about the numbers,” David Walker told the committee during a hearing Jan. 11.

While it will cost some money to ship the additional troops to Iraq, and more for combat pay, the extra cost will be nowhere near $5.6 billion, an aide to Walker explained after the hearing.

It is unclear what much of the $5.6 billion is to be spent on, Walker said.


Wait! This gets better...

Walker and many others have complained that tens of billions of dollars are spent on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan annually with little explanation of what the money is spent on.

The wars have been funded largely through emergency supplemental appropriations. The emergency requests provide Congress with scant detail on spending.


Congress passed legislation last fall requiring that war costs be included in the regular defense budget beginning after this year. But when President George W. Bush signed the defense spending bill, he tacked on a signing statement that indicates he might or might not comply, “as the President deems necessary and expedient.”

The degree to which this administration ignores the laws passed by Congress is stunning. :shk:

Of course, what is another few billion on top of the half trillion already dedicated to this mess?


[edit on 15-1-2007 by loam]

posted on Jan, 16 2007 @ 12:15 AM
Wow, a government watchdog group who siphons money from the US government criticizes the US government. I wonder what they are after.

posted on Jan, 16 2007 @ 12:19 AM
I believe the reason why this is happening is because. Osama bin laden said america would be put into a financial nightmare. Then u put two and two together and realize obl was a cia creation and that america employs the cia. but then you realize the cia is helping use american soliders to capture and help israel stay alive. so then u realize israel mossad and cia are one in the same and they're using America, the melting pot, as the military might that Israel lacks because of their population. So they needed our servicemen.

posted on Jan, 16 2007 @ 12:36 AM

Originally posted by Soitenly
Wow, a government watchdog group who siphons money from the US government criticizes the US government. I wonder what they are after.


And if any of you care about your families futures, you should be very concerned.

new topics

top topics

log in