It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TehLoneGunman
As many of you may have recently seen, news channels have been paying a lot of attention to both the "US troop increase in Iraq" and "Prince Harry of Wales being deployed in Iraq". Now it is my little suspicion that this troop increase is really for the protection of Prince Harry. If President Bush wanted an increase, why now? He could have done it months ago. The idea that he was waiting for the results from this past Novembers election, holds no water. Prince Harry will be deployed in Iraq, according to reports, in May of this year. The Bush administration has said, in response to the increase that, "We will know in the coming months if it has worked." I ask you this, what is happening in the coming months??? Harry's deployment to Iraq.
I may or may not be wrong, but I think this is something worth looking into.
Originally posted by stumason
There have been many examples of Royals in combat, most recently in the Falklands with Prince Andrew.
I think this theory is bloody stupid, mind you, but all the crap you guys are throwing at Harry is uncalled for. He passed the course same as any other cadet and is doing the job, same as any other. He has expressed a desire to not treated any differently, other wise he would quit as there would be no point.