It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Gman666
Look what I am saying is that I can think of many better ways to spend dollars then an elevator to space.
Originally posted by Gman666
Is it just me or does this just seem like a REALLY big wast of money??? I know I can't be the last person on earth left with a brain in my dome. I mean unless this is being funded by "Privet Investors" then that is another story but it the worlds nations are to contribute then give me a break.
Originally posted by gps777
Two i would not trust any compound to make the tether and unforeseen weather conditions,extreme wind speeds that could effect it eventually to fail etc.
Space Elevator: Weather
In the atmosphere, the risk factors of wind and lightning come into play. The basic mitigation is location. As long as the tether's anchor remains within two degrees of the equator, it will remain in the quiet zone between the Earth's Hadley cells, where there is relatively little violent weather.
Originally posted by semperfoo
Nanotechnology has been in use in products for over a decade now. The very first application was anti-scratch coatings on glasses. IT has made the move into nanoscale engineering as well, they are now talking about sub 50 nanometer fabs as being the next thing to come along.
Originally posted by gps777
Two i would not trust any compound to make the tether and unforeseen weather conditions,extreme wind speeds that could effect it eventually to fail etc.
You wouldn't have to worry, so much about the weather if you build on the equator. From the wiki link posted on the first page...
Space Elevator: Weather
In the atmosphere, the risk factors of wind and lightning come into play. The basic mitigation is location. As long as the tether's anchor remains within two degrees of the equator, it will remain in the quiet zone between the Earth's Hadley cells, where there is relatively little violent weather.
I suggest reading the info in that wiki link. A lot of the problems you and others fear have been already thought of and addressed.
Originally posted by kaptain disfunct
I completely agree. I believe the most important LONG term goal of space exploration should be to find a habitable planet or other forms of life. Presently, there are too many complications with space travel, and the government should not throw away its money to mess around with tourism.
On the other hand I would support it as a private venture and would applaud anyone who had the perseverance to finance and run something as huge as the proposed space elevator.
Tourists with money should pay, not ordinary citizens.
Originally posted by jbondo
If it were not for this technology you would not have your computers or ipods or cell phones, not to mention all the medical and other beneficial applications.
........................................
No, this is not a waste of time. Do some research on your own and you will find how this technology is involved in your life every day.
Originally posted by Soitenly
there is no carbon nanotube or nanotechonology which sounds an awfully lot like polymer chemistry and a definite pr campaign. even if you some how could do thi you are going to need 400 miles of cable with about 20 feet in diameter. try and find out what the volume is.
only a hippie could believe this outrageous nonsense
[edit on 15-1-2007 by Soitenly]
Originally posted by Soitenly
this is not a sci fi book or a movie, this real life. you would need over 400 miles of cable about 20 ft in thickness and your elevator would come crashing backdown to earth in the first place
Originally posted by Yarcofin
Can you imagine if you weren't from Earth and you saw a random giant pole sticking out of a planet?
Originally posted by jra
Originally posted by Nygdan
What happens if there is a failure and the elevator crashes to the earth?
It would fly out into space actually.