It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by KonigKaos
I personally dont think Democrats can handle this. Democrats in full control, they will bring back all the troops. Terriorists, etc, etc will regain strogholds in Iraq and Afganistan (the forgotten war) and they will chase us all the way back to our land and attack us here. They will do it...
Originally posted by SteveR
how many times has the mujahadeen and even al-qaeda stated that if the West leaves the region (including support for Israel) they will call it quits? I'm losing count here.
[edit on 14/1/07 by SteveR]
Originally posted by GT100FV
I think one could safely say that Saddam and Hugo would be considered bad guys no matter what.
Originally posted by GT100FV
Don't even pretend to argue that the oil profits are going to be shared with the general populace
Originally posted by GT100FV
where the rich Sheiks hand out money to the average schmos.
Originally posted by SteveR
Originally posted by GT100FV
I think one could safely say that Saddam and Hugo would be considered bad guys no matter what.
I am left wondering where you get all this stuff. Fox?
The ignorant statement you pose exceeds the scope of this thread, but I can safely say you are sorely lacking in information.
Originally posted by GT100FV
Don't even pretend to argue that the oil profits are going to be shared with the general populace
Venezuela has seen record regeneration. Big Oil kept that country in extreme poverty until Chavez demanded change, and was brave enough to wrestle for it. The U.S. government sponsored the killing of many innocent civilians in order to depose Chavez. No thanks to Pat Robertson. He came back, eventually, and his people vote him in everytime.
I've seen the changes in Venezuela. It is a GOOD thing. Please, no more mainstream news crap.
Originally posted by GT100FV
where the rich Sheiks hand out money to the average schmos.
Sheiks are in the Middle East. Not Venezuela or anywhere else.
Here's a sheik that fits your bill quite well:
I beleive that particular one shares the least oil money with his greatly suppressed populace.
I suppose this is ok with you.
Originally posted by RRconservative
quote by forestlady
How would you like it if I constantly bombarded this site with statements about Republicans being stupid,l blind, non-compassionate, hate/war mongerers who want to destroy America?
You don't?
[edit on 13-1-2007 by RRconservative]
Originally posted by grover
I wonder what it will take before the military in this country stands up and says enough is enough Mr. President, your policies are bad for the country and they are bad for the military and its ability to continue protecting us? Not a coup mind you but a realistic refusal to continue with a bad and bloody policy.
Originally posted by grover
I wonder what it will take before the military in this country stands up and says enough is enough Mr. President, your policies are bad for the country and they are bad for the military and its ability to continue protecting us? Not a coup mind you but a realistic refusal to continue with a bad and bloody policy.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
And this is why this needs to change, so that it will never, and can never, ever happen again. There needs to be a way installed legislatively that puts either their lives or the lives of their family at risk in the crossfire- meaning, of course, that whatever their endeavor, they are willing to risk their lives over it before they take the lives of others. In this regard civilization has regressed. May the days of commanders leading their troops into battle return, dear God.
Originally posted by forestlady
Right on, TA, I have a proposal. How about whenever Congress thinks they need to go to war, that we make a law saying that Congress's own children must be the first ones to go off to war.
Originally posted by GT100FV
So you don't think it could be a serious political liability for a Dem in '08, to have voted to cut off funding to the troops? It's true that most are not happy about what's going on in Iraq, but.....most still support the troops. If you vote to cut off funding for them to be able to do their job, that hurts the troops, not Bush, and that's why it wouldn't be a very saavy political manuever.