It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by selfless
sesfan,
i mean no disrespect but every time someone posts something about a ufo you always try to give a mundain explaination of what it is and you never for once take into consideration that it could be unidentified...
It's clear to me now that you have an agenda to randomly try to disprove any footage or story about ufo's there is on this board and i want to ask you,
why?
[edit on 11-1-2007 by selfless]
Originally posted by selfless
sesfan,
no one is asking you to believe everything you see but my point is that every time i see you post i have not once seen you say the word ufo as a possibility.
It's like every ufo you see you dismiss right away, i honestly can't explain the videos of the theter ufo's as being camera malfunction that is taking it a bit far on the skeptic side...
Just be open to ''all'' the possiblities not just the debunk explainations.
Oh i have a good idea, sesfan if you don't mind i want you to show me a ufo case you saw in your life that you can't say it's not a ufo.
If there is one i can't wait to see it because it must be jaw dropping for you to think it's a ufo when you dismiss a 2 km long ufo in space video taped by nasa.
Originally posted by Will To Power
I am doubtful that this is space debris close to the shuttle. The objects are moving in opposite directions simutaneously and they clearly disappear behind the tether. Also they are not diamond-shaped, so I'm not sure how terrestrial filmed, diamond-shaped objects relate to this discussion.
Originally posted by selfless
Sesfan,
Alright as long as you keep all possibilities possible then it's all good :0
Small dust particles, which are continually shed by the Station, scatter the sunlight and are easily visible against the black background. You can see the same effect when looking at a sunbeam shining in through a window - you can see all the very tiny dust particles floating in the air. It turns out that some of the tiny particles (mostly paint flecks) that come off the Station are actually big enough so that they can look like a twinkling star as they float away and rotate. So when looking out the window at these times when we are in sunlight but the ground below is dark, you can often see little bright specks slowly drifting away from the Station.
Originally posted by sensfan
Actually, the info about it being out of focus points of light, be it dust, space debris, etc is correct. When you film a point of light and are way out of focus, the light will take on the shape of the iris within the camera. All these oval's with holes in the middle and a notch are doing just that.
Any time you see one of those lit up "diamond" ufo's with the top, or bottom tip of the diamond being brighter, it is the same thing.
No time to get links for you, am at work, but will dig some up later this evening.
Originally posted by DigThat
What I don't get is why all the space debris all in all would pretty much look the same. How much space debris is there floating around? And why isnt any of this space debris visible on the regular camcordings of space flights, but just the ultra violet one used here?
Originally posted by selfless
freezer,
regardless of the size of the objects they were there and they were not small.
Originally posted by 137
come on people, already forgot STS-115?!
These were the same kind of objects you are talking about now, and did you know that NASA at this date still has no real explenations for these objects wich manouver themselfes towards shuttles. So all they say is they think it is space debris.. wich is BS cause space debris has no propulsion to change its course and direction in space.
Another odd thing is that most of the STS-115 UFO footage was deleted from youtube's database for unknown violations..
A thread about STS-115