Originally posted by jritzmann
Now, support it. Dont just say "I dont know what to tell you". Who said this? Greer? Again, where's the support for these kind of statements?
I really can't understand the angry tone of your responses
It seems as though responding to your posts is like trying to fill a black hole so much is your anger regarding this subject.
Why do I have to support anything I say? Your argument is with Dr Greer not me. I don't have any first hand experience with any of this. I would
assume you have never talked to Greer yourself either. I'm just reflecting back to you what I know about Dr Greer and what I've read about him. You
me nor anyone else can even prove that any of us even exist. About theses issues, I agree with you to disagree.
This is a discussion group. I'm not going to turn this into an argument. You can with someone else if someone else wants to play along. I'm not
going to bear the burden of any resentment you would have against Dr Greer, though I question why Dr Greer's actions would cause you resentment.
Whether I choose to believe him or not, my life is pretty much the way it is either way.
I see the Disclosure Project as a work in progress. If not everything doesn't seem nailed down and air tight, that doesn't matter much to me. Until
disclosure is achieved everything is up in the air as far as I'm concerned. If Greer's efforts accomplish it fine, if someone else, good.
Thank you for bringing the Woolsey issue up, I wasn't aware he was disputing what happened. That was the most troubling thing that I read of your
statements. Here is a response I got back from Debbie regarding Woolsey, verbatim:
Woolsey was in denial about the meeting after Dr. Greer's ET Contact book came out. However, he didn't know that Dr. Greer saved the paper trial
and Fed Ex's from the person who arranged the meeting, which explains the purpose of the meeting.
And on reflection, Greer did mention these Fed Exs in his 2006 retelling of the story in 'Hidden', that was why he was being invited, and that the
cover was a dinner party, but it was way more than that.
That seems a logical respone to me. If you want to find fault in that,which I'm sure you will the 'post reply' button is open to you.
My point in regards to Larry King is that after the King episode Dr Greer admitted to King that president Clinton did know about these issues. You are
the one that doesn't want to believe that, and that's fine with me as I previously stated. You don't have to believe.
If you want confirmation about that I merely suggested that you see if Larry King will corroborate that for you, if you need undisputable truth,
which it seems that's what you are asking for, and that's fine-I can't give that to you.
I will say 'I don't know what to tell you' or anything else I desire to say if I want to because neither can you control what I believe nor what I
say. Your attempt to try to censor what I say seems a desperate attempt at something, but I'm not sure what.
I guess the bottom line about any of this is that even if a small portion of any of this is true, it means a lot for our world. If I'm being taken by
a medicine show, that's not really any of your concern.
Dr Greer has done more to expose this than either you or me, and that's what I want to be a part of. I'm not sure that our discussions are helping
that along.