Steven Greer at LA Conscious Life Expo, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times


reply posted on 13-1-2007 @ 12:35 PM by skip_brilliantine
Originally posted by TruthMagnet
I (and I think may others here) would gladly support a group that raised UFOlogy awareness with innovative media campaigns - (like those thought provoking anti-smoking ads) - and who provided an internet library of sorts that allowed universal access to a large collection of compiled UFO evidence and UFOlogy white papers (even if it cost a one time or monthly fee).


At the risk of going off-topic, I just wanted to provide some perspective on this, as the agency I work at produces those same thought-provoking anti-smoking ads.

They are funded (or rather the funds are managed) by the American Legacy Foundation, which is "a 501(c)(3) public charity established in March 1999 as a result of the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) between a coalition of Attorneys General in 46 states and five U.S. territories and the tobacco industry." (
source)

In other words, all of those ads are funded by that huge settlement you may remember from back in 1999. Most anti-smoking advertising (and other media) you've seen since then has been the result of legally mandated tobacco industry money, and that money has been in the hundreds of millions annually.

All of which I point out so that you understand the astronomical funding and unusual legal circumstances that went and still goes into those media efforts.

The likelihood of Greer or any other UFO group having the resources to afford even a single, one-time thirty-second advertising spot on national television, never mind the cost of producing the ad itself, is zero. They couldn't even swing the media buyers' fees. No matter how much he charges for his outings.



reply posted on 14-1-2007 @ 04:14 PM by c3hamby
Originally posted by jritzmann

c3hamby-
I've seen that film before.



You said there were no videos of CSETI events. I'm providing you with evidence that there is. They don't look like airplanes or sattelites to me, but that's just me.

BTW, I'm not asking you to believe any of this. It does not affect me one way or the other what you think. One thing is for sure, we're either right or wrong about all of it, none of it or some of it or somewhere in between.

Originally posted by jritzmann

Here's the document I refer to in his overstating his "briefing". Sounds like nothing but casual dinner conversation brought up and forgetten just as easy.
www.ufowatchdog.com...


Thank you for providing that. I note that the date on the letter is 1999. In 2006 the account is re presented in Greer's book 'Hidden'. I'm going to take it upon myself to contact Debbie to see what her response is. I can't imagine why Greer would've have reincluded it if there was really ever a true acknowledgement of error on Greer's part.

BTW, if you would like to have your own Woolsey letterhead, I'll be happy to offer some for sale, at 10 dollars/per ream.

Originally posted by jritzmann

Easy then. Dont bring it up. He has no proof, and such claims are irresponcible to make, it's that simple. When you have proof of such, youre in the clear to talk about it.



Well, anonymous statements are credited daily in the press, perhaps we can recall Watergate, or Valerie P (McLennan can fill you in ) for you. If Deepthroat had been discredited for this reason, maybe we would have never brought Nixon's misgivings to light...

Originally posted by jritzmann

What? An no doubt you have proof of such a thing right? Or is this Greer's statement? No, he got caught trying to put some air forward that he was "in the know" as he always does, and stated he had no idea how much the president was briefed. When you have a statement from Clinton or a verified statement from an aide, lemme know.



Good point. Don't know what to tell you, ask Larry King. As you insinuate there could be more than one interpretation on an event, check the Clinton book to corroborate the fact Clinton was looking into the subject of ufos.

If we had a verified statement from Clinton on any of this you and me would be having a diffferent conversation about this whole thing, probably on BTS.

The whole point of disclosure is for public officials to come out with this, I'm hoping 'Hidden' helps that happen.

I'll get back with you when I hear back from Debbie.



reply posted on 14-1-2007 @ 10:53 PM by Nygdan
Originally posted by tock
Originally posted by Nygdan
You could get any of those shows on TV for free, if you actually presented real proof of alien contact.


I call BS. Like if he didn't try

So you suggest that Greer has tried to release his proof of alien contact, but no one will put it up?

I mean, its actual proof that would convince a person, and its being covered up, by everyone, everywhere, in all media sources.

I remember at least 2 media outlet that offered to show Steven's work, but retracted as soon as the leaders of the media said "NO", you won't show that, or else you lose your job...

Such as who?
What leaders of the media?
And what about the other billion media outlets out there????

over with those one liners. Nygdan is good for that

Excuse me?
One liners?

You are problably the first person to ever accuse me of being too breif.

He is also, constantly attacking the man that brought the Disclosure Project National Press Club to life,

So what? The guy is a fraud. I am allowed to say that.

just to crush someone and those one liners brings absolutely nothing to the posting but to try to upset and descredit someone

I am not trying to 'crush' anyone, I am expressing my understanding of the situation, and trying to probe to find out why other people think what they think, and find out what they think about my ideas. Thats called 'a discussion'. I am not trying to discredit anyone, and since I am not an authority, how can i discredit anyone? I am certainly not trying to discredit other members. I am having a dicussion. I am allowed to disagree with you and others you know.

If Deepthroat had been discredited for this reason, maybe we would have never brought Nixon's misgivings to light

The difference is that Deepthroat wasn't saying 'i have spectacular information, BUT, I won't tell you'. Greer certainly isn't doing what Woodward did. He's suppressing the information.


reply posted on 15-1-2007 @ 03:28 PM by c3hamby
Originally posted by jritzmann

Now, support it. Dont just say "I dont know what to tell you". Who said this? Greer? Again, where's the support for these kind of statements?



I really can't understand the angry tone of your responses

It seems as though responding to your posts is like trying to fill a black hole so much is your anger regarding this subject.

Why do I have to support anything I say? Your argument is with Dr Greer not me. I don't have any first hand experience with any of this. I would assume you have never talked to Greer yourself either. I'm just reflecting back to you what I know about Dr Greer and what I've read about him. You me nor anyone else can even prove that any of us even exist. About theses issues, I agree with you to disagree.

This is a discussion group. I'm not going to turn this into an argument. You can with someone else if someone else wants to play along. I'm not going to bear the burden of any resentment you would have against Dr Greer, though I question why Dr Greer's actions would cause you resentment. Whether I choose to believe him or not, my life is pretty much the way it is either way.

I see the Disclosure Project as a work in progress. If not everything doesn't seem nailed down and air tight, that doesn't matter much to me. Until disclosure is achieved everything is up in the air as far as I'm concerned. If Greer's efforts accomplish it fine, if someone else, good.

Thank you for bringing the Woolsey issue up, I wasn't aware he was disputing what happened. That was the most troubling thing that I read of your statements. Here is a response I got back from Debbie regarding Woolsey, verbatim:


Woolsey was in denial about the meeting after Dr. Greer's ET Contact book came out. However, he didn't know that Dr. Greer saved the paper trial and Fed Ex's from the person who arranged the meeting, which explains the purpose of the meeting.


And on reflection, Greer did mention these Fed Exs in his 2006 retelling of the story in 'Hidden', that was why he was being invited, and that the cover was a dinner party, but it was way more than that.

That seems a logical respone to me. If you want to find fault in that,which I'm sure you will the 'post reply' button is open to you.

My point in regards to Larry King is that after the King episode Dr Greer admitted to King that president Clinton did know about these issues. You are the one that doesn't want to believe that, and that's fine with me as I previously stated. You don't have to believe.

If you want confirmation about that I merely suggested that you see if Larry King will corroborate that for you, if you need undisputable truth, which it seems that's what you are asking for, and that's fine-I can't give that to you.

I will say 'I don't know what to tell you' or anything else I desire to say if I want to because neither can you control what I believe nor what I say. Your attempt to try to censor what I say seems a desperate attempt at something, but I'm not sure what.

I guess the bottom line about any of this is that even if a small portion of any of this is true, it means a lot for our world. If I'm being taken by a medicine show, that's not really any of your concern.

Dr Greer has done more to expose this than either you or me, and that's what I want to be a part of. I'm not sure that our discussions are helping that along.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 10 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 18 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 13 days ago with 31 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 4 days ago with 27 member flags
Jacques Vallee: Implications of UFO Phenomena - Thinking Allowed.
  Posted 2 days ago with 23 member flags
UFO above Wadden Sea
  Posted 12 days ago with 14 member flags