It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Scientists find Extraterrestrial genes in Human DNA

page: 1
8
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 8 2007 @ 09:14 PM
link   
I think as everyone works together and finds bits and pieces of a universal puzzle we will one day soon be able to see the whole picture of the puzzle.

I found this really interesting article today while surfing.

I like to hear what others think on this discovery and if anyone else has heard similar findings.

More of the article follow the link.

Thanks

RT

www.agoracosmopolitan.com...



A group of researchers working at the Human Genome Project indicate that they made an astonishing scientific discovery: They believe so-called 97% non-coding sequences in human DNA is no less than genetic code of extraterrestrial life forms.

The non-coding sequences are common to all living organisms on Earth, from moulds to fish to humans. In human DNA, they constitute larger part of the total genome, says Prof. Sam Chang, the group leader. Non-coding sequences, originally known as "junk DNA", were discovered years ago, and their function remained a mystery. The overwhelming majority of Human DNA is “Off-world” in origin. The apparent “extraterrestrial junk genes” merely “enjoy the ride” with hard working active genes, passed from generation to generation.

After comprehensive analysis with the assistance of other scientists, computer programmers, mathematicians, and other learned scholars, Professor Chang had wondered if the apparently “junk Human DNA” was created by some kind of “extraterrestrial programmer”. The alien chunks within Human DNA, Professor Chang further observes, “have its own veins, arteries, and its own immune system that vigorously resists all our anti-cancer drugs.”






[edit on 8-1-2007 by Realtruth]

~~~~~~~~~~~~
Replaced quote with 'ex' tags

[edit on 8/1/07 by masqua]




posted on Jan, 8 2007 @ 09:33 PM
link   
before this gets flamed by narrow minded morons

i will chime in and say this "97% of our dna that is termed JUNK DNA" is an embarresing outright lie

97 percent of our make up is "junk" or we can't handle the truth

the powers that be believe that 5 % need to tell the other 95% how to act and behave, and this is something we are not ready to handle, must be uncredible source or lets throw in some "blinder phrases" like hoax or fraud or conspiracy to get people to forget about it. sorry for the rant

GREAT FIND great thoughts

seems like a hundred years from now (or less) man will be saying remember when the public really beleived we were the only intelligent life in the universe, and ridiculed others who thought other wise" laugh it off



posted on Jan, 8 2007 @ 09:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by Realtruth
I found this really interesting article today while surfing.
www.agoracosmopolitan.com...


A quick google search turns up a lot of "alternative" sites (which that link is, by the way - it is not like the New York Times or CNN or something), but I see nothing showing that this information is accepted, confirmed, or even remotely taken seriously. I read newsfeeds and journal abstracts from academic publications and I haven't yet seen "CONFIRMED: WE HAVE ALIEN DNA IN US" come across. But hey, I might have blinked and missed it.

I've also visited the website for the human genome project
www.ornl.gov...

It doesn't mention that humans have alien DNA, but I suppose that unimportant information might be further into the site after a few clicks and I haven't had time to dig through it.



posted on Jan, 8 2007 @ 09:42 PM
link   
cpdaman excellent comments and much appreciated.

Here are my thoughts it only takes one person to change the world and the way everyone thinks and believes.

Look at history many people thought the world was flat. Most believe knew about the force of electricity but it was never harnessed, until......one day, then everything changed in an instant and how the world was.

That is what I think is going to happen with Genes, aliens, UFO it will only that that one thing and it will happen exponentially and quicker than we think.



[edit on 8-1-2007 by Realtruth]



posted on Jan, 8 2007 @ 09:53 PM
link   
no prob real truth, unless u have tried to swallow the red pill ( and done some time searching) i would have seen this as a joke a couple years ago

i would have said cnn would be covering it if it was really true, then u dig and then u learn the global elitist's have the money and they own the banks that finance and run the media, they decide the rules and regulations of what is acceptable to report news and the perspectives to take, and the ceo's relay this to the managers and then to the anchors and reports who follow these guidelines or lose there respective jobs plain and simple



posted on Jan, 8 2007 @ 10:00 PM
link   
There are also some possible ideas of what junk DNA is at the wikipedia site here. They don't involve aliens and neither do any studies of junk DNA I've been reading(and there are plenty going on).

Some other interesting articles from studies:
www.eurekalert.org...

'Junk' DNA may be very valuable to embryos

I'll post more later if anybody cares, but I doubt anybody does. More fun to believe that guy who says it's alien DNA, and the websites that link to that article.



posted on Jan, 8 2007 @ 10:10 PM
link   
Ok, well.. If all the evidence of this "proof of alien DNA in human genome project" consists of: "the global elite are controlling the media, yada yada yada..." then this thread is a waste of time. I've pointed out some of the REAL scientific ideas about so-called junk-DNA (which is turning out not to be exactly junk) but I suppose it's cooler around here to talk like we're at some hippie drum circle, so here's my contribution:

Yeah, man. I'm feeling the groove. Down with the established logic-oriented truth prison. The truth isn't out there, man, it's IN HERE. Right in my DNA, coiled like a wormhole to the ultimate mind.

There.



posted on Jan, 9 2007 @ 11:17 AM
link   

Professor Chang further indicates that “What we see in our DNA is a program consisting of two versions, a big code and basic code.” Mr. Chang then affirms that the “First fact is, the complete ‘program’ was positively not written on Earth; that is now a verified fact. The second fact is, that genes by themselves are not enough to explain evolution; there must be something more in ‘the game‘.”

“Soon or later”, Professor Chang says “we have to come to grips with the unbelievable notion that every life on Earth carries genetic code for his extraterrestrial cousin and that evolution is not what we think it is.”



Thanks for posting this article. It is well written and makes a convincing case.

Folks always say there is no signs of alien DNA around but this article would have us believe that there is ample alien DNA mixed into our own DNA.



posted on Jan, 9 2007 @ 11:24 AM
link   
I didnt read through the entire article, so I'll just as a simple question:

Why is it alien?



posted on Jan, 9 2007 @ 11:31 AM
link   
I remember either reading or seeing something on tv a couple years ago about how extraterrestrial organisms may have descended from the atmosphere (from the debri of a comet or something) and "mutated" us. Problem is there are gene structures in humans that are not present in other lifeforms on earth.

Course I'm just going on memory so I could be wrong... but it's a possibility.

Then again you could take the theory a bit further and just assume that we are genetically modified apes courtesy your friendly alien neighbors.



posted on Jan, 9 2007 @ 01:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kruel
I remember either reading or seeing something on tv a couple years ago about how extraterrestrial organisms may have descended from the atmosphere (from the debri of a comet or something) and "mutated" us. Problem is there are gene structures in humans that are not present in other lifeforms on earth.

Mutations are so common in nature you have to wonder why we dont have 4 arms by now.

I still ask: Why is it alien?



posted on Jan, 9 2007 @ 01:36 PM
link   
This is just silly. They site no rationale for calling any of this stuff extra-terrestrial.
How is Dr. Chang actually associated with the Human Genome Project? Lots of different labs and organizations made contributions to the HGP project, directed by US government agencies. What did his group specifically do as part of the project?

This page gives more of the rationale. Its weak rationale, imo.
www.virtuallystrange.net...

I can't help but wonder if Dr. Chang's ideas are being either misrepresented, or if the reporters are just doing a poor job of explaining his rationale.


www.virtuallystrange.net...
He once mentioned the question to an acquaintance, Dr.
Lipshutz, a young theoretical physicist turned Wall Street
derivative securities specialist. "Easy," replied Lipshutz.
"We'll run your sequence through the software I use to analyze
market data, and it will show if your sequences are total
garbage, "white noise", or there is a message in there."


And therefore its made by aliens? Researchers have LONG realized, that "Junk" DNA isn't literally Junk. It doesn't code for proteins. Just because something doesn't code for proteins doesn't mean its 'junk' and has no purpose.


Since
there are letters, it should be tested in some old languages,
perhaps Sumerian, Egyptian, Hebrew, and so on. Prof. Sam Chang
solicited help from three specialists in the field, but none of
them managed to find a solution. There were no cultural clues,
no references to other known languages, the field was too alien
for the linguists.

Its pretty bizzare to say that you can convert the genetic code into a human language, let alone specifically the written form of any one langauge. Junk DNA is in every organism, and existed billions of years before humans did. Its unreasonable to suggest that aliens made it, created extremely primitive bacteria, and then over billions of years these bacteria evolved, man popped up one day, and then started using letters and writting that can be transfered to that alien genetic code. Its just as strange to say that you can use the english alphabet to get it.


www.virtuallystrange.net...
Trained as a cryptographer and computer programmer, and having
no knowledge of microbiology, Adnan approached the genetic code
as of computer code. Dealing with 0, 1, 2, 3 (four bases of
genetic code) instead of 0s and 1s of the binary code was a sort
of nuisance, but the computer code was what he was analyzing and
deciphering all his life. He was on familiar territory. The most
common symbol in the code that causes no action followed by a
chunk of dormant code. What is that? Just playing with the
analogy Adnan grabbed the source code of one his programs and
fed it into the program that calculates the statistics of
symbols and short sequences, a tool often used in decoding
messages. What was the most common symbol? Of course, it was
"/", a symbol of comment! He took a Pascal code, and it were [
and ] ! Of course, the code between two slashes in C is never
executed, and is never meant to be executed; it is not the code,
it is the comment to the code!

Not much reasoning there. "In computer codes, there are lots of comments put in by the programmers, so if there's lots of something in DNA....It must be comments by a programmer'.




Of course, these are mostly people other than Dr. Chang. I can't help but wonder if his ideas are being poorly represented in these articles.



[edit on 9-1-2007 by Nygdan]

[edit on 9-1-2007 by Nygdan]



posted on Jan, 9 2007 @ 01:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by probedbygrays
Thanks for posting this article. It is well written and makes a convincing case.

What did you find convincing? Specifically.


I think I might've found Dr. Chang:

www.ag.ndsu.edu...

www.ag.ndsu.edu...

[edit on 9-1-2007 by Nygdan]

[edit on 9-1-2007 by Nygdan]



posted on Jan, 9 2007 @ 01:53 PM
link   
Here is another interesting article I found.


Link to Site





Forget waiting for ET to call -- the most likely place to find an alien message is in our DNA, according to an expert in Australia.

Professor Paul Davies, from the Australian Centre for Astrobiology at Macquarie University in Sydney, believes a cosmic greeting card could have been left in every human cell.

The coded message would only be discovered once the human race had the technology to read and understand it.

Writing in New Scientist magazine, Davies said the idea should be considered seriously.



Shortened cut/paste and added 'ex' tags.

[edit on 9/1/07 by masqua]



posted on Jan, 9 2007 @ 01:59 PM
link   
they use Billy Meier for reference.

...which won't fly with a lot of people around here, i imagine, especially in this forum..

PS: you don't need to read the entire article, just skim it
but be careful you#ll only spot what you deem undesireable

snippet


races. The most extensively documented and researched contactee is Eduard ‘Billy' Meier who provided much physical evidence for investigators.



posted on Jan, 9 2007 @ 01:59 PM
link   
I would have to agree with the term "Junk DNA" being not so good.

here is another link to an article that give some light on the Junk DNA term and that there is always something to get out of so called Junk.

www.virtuallystrange.net...




New Findings About "Junk DNA" May Bring Some Surprises

A group of researchers working at the Human Genome Project will
be announcing soon that they made an astonishing scientific
discovery: They believe so-called non-coding sequences (97%) in
human DNA is no less than genetic code of an unknown
extraterrestrial life form.



posted on Jan, 9 2007 @ 02:00 PM
link   
Lets keep the Dr. Chang research seperate from the Paul Davies and Billy Meir ideas, at least in this thread.



posted on Jan, 9 2007 @ 02:03 PM
link   
My question. If we've never met any extraterrestials to know what their DNA make is, how are these "scientists" able to say that our DNA is part extraterrestrial? Doesn't make sense to me.



posted on Jan, 9 2007 @ 02:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by Sophismata
... I see nothing showing that this information is ...., or even remotely taken seriously.


But, hasn't it been remotely taken seriously in this thread?

_______________________________

My first thought after reading the title was:
And they compared the DNA to what?

_______________________________

If True ...

Perhaps if people were inclined to want to know what their intentions were derived from that act as a catalyst for their actions and behaviors, people would become conscious enough to access the other 97% of our dna, and have the PROOF they seek, if only they were to choose to seek ......



posted on Jan, 9 2007 @ 02:38 PM
link   
They're not comparing it to anything. It looks like, from the article, that they are trying to say that because it is structured, that it has an unknown function. ANd then they are suggesting that teh structure is the type that we have in our own computer program coding, thus implying it was coded by a programmer, which, of course, would have ot be god or an alien, in this case.




top topics



 
8
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join