Was the Bible's Goliath a real creature?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 12-12-2003 @ 03:53 PM by exdog
HOLY CRIKES!!!



good topic



reply posted on 12-12-2003 @ 10:53 PM by darklanser
Originally posted by exdog
HOLY CRIKES!!!



good topic


I was excited until I read the part about the femur being a reconstructed sculpture. What happened to the original...and where are the skulls? That would be awesome to see!! A gigantic humanoid skull !


reply posted on 12-12-2003 @ 10:58 PM by darklanser
I looked up some more info on the giants found in the Euphrates Valley region.

This site has a bit more info. >
www.stevequayle.com...
(specifically about the photo above)


It sounds unbelievable. I have lived with my family at Ain-Tell for more than 14 years at the very spot where King Nebuchadnezzar had his headquarters after the battle of Charcamish, where I dug the graves of kings’ officers and found their skeletons like sponge, and when you touch them they become like white ash, with spears and silex and obsidian tools and ammunition laying by.



reply posted on 15-12-2003 @ 08:00 AM by nathraq
Originally posted by exdog
HOLY CRIKES!!!



good topic


I would love to get my hands on a chicken leg that big!

Seriously: Anatomically impossible. How in the world could giants have existed in a region of the world where food was scarce, except for the well to do? The Romans thought the Germanic tribesmen were giants, due to their high protein diets. I'm no doctor, but I don't think a people could become "giants" on a diet of locusts and sheeps cheese.


reply posted on 15-12-2003 @ 08:57 AM by Byrd
The fossil leg bone you see in the picture is actually not a real artifact. Nobody found it. It's a sculpture.

In fact, the information on the picture says that it's a sculpture and not a real human bone. Physically it's not thick enough to support a human that would be that tall (well over 15 feet tall.) The height limit on human giants seems to be around 9 feet tall, and their systems are fragile (the bones break easily for one thing.)

The other observation I'd like to make regards human reproduction and giants.

Now... I'm sure it's exciting and erotic to think of it, but if you've got someone with a male reproductive organ that's the size of your arm and he's fully aroused and he wants to insert ALL of it in your body -- frankly, most normal sized people of that time would Run Away Very Quickly.

If he got rough, you wouldn't survive. If he's on top, he'd crush you or smother you -- IF he could achieve arousal.

So, if you were building a giant the bone proportions would have to be much different. For a good ecological example, take a look at the eohippus ("dawn horse") skeletons and then take a look at a modern horse skeleton. They're very different in size and structure and a modern quarterhorse couldn't mate with little eohippus.

Same problem with the idea of human giants.

Ah yes. For a good example of the thickness needed for a 15-20 foot tall biped, take a look at the T-rex skeletons.
www.jpaftermath.com...

You'll find that all other bipedal dinos of the same height had leg bones of about the same thickness. That sculpted femur would never have stood the weight.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Origin of Ancient Jade Tool Baffles Scientists
  Posted 8 days ago with 96 member flags
12,000 Years Old Unexplained Structure
  Posted 5 days ago with 81 member flags
The Uluburun shipwreck sunk 3,400 years ago
  Posted 16 days ago with 70 member flags
Sigiriya : The 8th Wonder of the World
  Posted 5 days ago with 45 member flags
Tomb of Queen Heterpheres
  Posted 17 days ago with 29 member flags
R.O.V. Photos of Sunken Megaliths off Western Cuba
  Posted 12 days ago with 21 member flags