 |
|
Topic started on 12-12-2003 @ 02:27 PM by Genya
|
Hi folks!!!
I've just checked the ATS group on SETI@home and it's showing 46000 WU's exactly at 18:34:57!!
I thought that was quite a nice milestone - well done, all you number-crunchers!!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-12-2003 @ 02:43 PM by baked
|
now if we could just get more people to pertisipate
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-12-2003 @ 02:45 PM by Genya
|
Originally posted by baked
now if we could just get more people to pertisipate 
....we'd be up to 50000 in no time at all!!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-12-2003 @ 09:02 AM by Genya
|
And well done, too, for the fantastic increase in membership as well everybody!! Couldn't believe the increase in ATS SETI stats - now showing as
48607 WU's at 14:36:31 in 63.091 yrs with 181 users. 50kWU's by Christmas, anybody??
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-12-2003 @ 09:06 AM by baked
|
I think we can hit that by christmas!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-12-2003 @ 09:22 AM by Genya
|
Originally posted by baked
I think we can hit that by christmas!

10 days - 1393 work units remaining??Shall we start a "book"?? What odds are we quoting baked??!!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-12-2003 @ 11:56 AM by elevatedone
|
I would consider participating...
would someone explain to me exactly what this is... in laymans terms ?
seriously, and also, how much of my computers resources would this take up, would I have to leave my computer on all of the time ?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-12-2003 @ 12:07 PM by darklanser
|
Elevated...there are two options you have after installing it. One, is to have it run only in a screensaver mode. The other is to have it run all the
time (it says it doesn't eat up much system resources in this mode) I have it set for screensaver mode and i keep my computer running most of the
time.
As for an explanation on the program itself. SETI recieves radio signals from space with various antenna arrays (Aricebo,PR is one of them). The
amount of data they collect would take hundreds of years to sift through using a few computers, so they designed this coordinated computing effort to
look for any signal that might be repeated or different than any of the rest. This is the Holy Grail of ET searchers.  By distributing the work
load, they have multiplied their computing power by each person that downloads and runs it.
[Edited on 12-16-2003 by darklanser]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-12-2003 @ 12:09 PM by elevatedone
|
Cool !!! I would love to join in, however, the computer that I am usually on is my work computer, so I don't want to do that.
The computer at home is really my Gal's, I'm not sure how she would react to me doing this, I'll talk to her tonight... she's pretty skeptical
when it comes to ET's and UFO's !
we'll see, wish me luck !
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-12-2003 @ 07:38 PM by baked
|
On 12/12/03 we had 46000, which started this thread.
Today is the 15th which is 3 days later and we have 48,642, that = 2642 done in 3 days.
Wait  
How did that happen??
Someone must have joined with an azz load of points.
I honestly forgot Christmas was so close, I still am thinking I have a month....damn.
Well, now that I think about it, it would take some major number crunching to make it.
I am putting out close to 15 wu's a day. so you can count me for atleast 150 wu's
L8R
Baked
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-12-2003 @ 09:17 PM by kaoszero
|
I'm thinking about putting SETI@home on a Windows NT workstation with about a half gig of RAM so I can really start cranking out some WUs. Right now
I do 1 a day, 3 if I leave the computer on all day and night, which doesn't happen often. I want to start using a faster system, or multiple systems
and decode more stuff. I want ATS to find something.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-12-2003 @ 09:32 PM by billybob
|
i'm not trying to quash your joy, but do you ever think that this linking of computers into a psuedo neural net is like a precursor to "skynet"?
or the "trapper-keeper" of south park? a test program to work out some bugs for a big brother info-gathering scenario?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-12-2003 @ 09:37 PM by THENEO
|
billybob,
there you go raining on the parade again!
LOL!
I gotta hand it too you man, you see through the numbers.
From my limited knowledge of computers I doubt there is a secure machine on the net anywhere. Many are saying that the future is distributed computing
like the Seti project is a good example of, but I have to agree with you that there are security concerns etc.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-12-2003 @ 09:39 PM by kaoszero
|
Originally posted by billybob
i'm not trying to quash your joy, but do you ever think that this linking of computers into a psuedo neural net is like a precursor to "skynet"?
or the "trapper-keeper" of south park? a test program to work out some bugs for a big brother info-gathering scenario? 
I've thought about it, but if that's the case it's really no different than using a Microsoft product on your computer, or having your computer
connected to the internet. Some spywares can not be gotten rid of.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-12-2003 @ 12:19 AM by billybob
|
Originally posted by THENEO
billybob,
there you go raining on the parade again!
LOL!
I gotta hand it too you man, you see through the numbers.
From my limited knowledge of computers I doubt there is a secure machine on the net anywhere. Many are saying that the future is distributed computing
like the Seti project is a good example of, but I have to agree with you that there are security concerns etc. 
HAHAHA! fun, eh? i'm not sayin', i'm just sayin'.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-12-2003 @ 08:44 AM by baked
|
Would they not just use windows update to watch us.
If they really want in to my machine they will get in it.
I trust my lil nerd friends to tear these programs apart and look for stuff like that.
I'm sure for every person that puts one in a program there is a person that looks for them in the program too.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-12-2003 @ 08:52 AM by xn
|
Anyone ever wonder how one person could finish like over a 100,000 WUs?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-12-2003 @ 08:57 AM by baked
|
No doubt!
Must have one hell of a computer or computers.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-12-2003 @ 09:04 AM by Genya
|
Originally posted by xn
Anyone ever wonder how one person could finish like over a 100,000 WUs? 
Good question!! Reading peoples profiles on SETI can be illuminating!!
I remember one guy (no, I can't recall his details unfortunately) was an Administrator at a LARGE college/ University in the States (*that* narrows
it down a bit!!  )
Anyway, he had access to 4000 - FOUR Thousand - networked computers that we on the campus and had installed SETI by default on every machine. Then, he
left a message on each machine informing the students if they wanted to "remove" it (rather than install it - and - hey presto - he was processing
about 4000 WU's every day. Rather humbling, I thought...
Here, I'm using two networked machines from home - both P4 - 2.0GHz and 2.6GHz - which return about 10 WU's a day. They are left on continually and
the program runs in the background. Having a cable modem menas that they conect automatically too, so, barring SETI server hanging (it does!), then
the process is fairly automatic.
*My* SETI user profile will explain a bit more if you're interested!!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-12-2003 @ 09:19 AM by darklanser
|
Originally posted by xn
Anyone ever wonder how one person could finish like over a 100,000 WUs? 
Could be a group using the same username. I think that's possible. So if 20 or 30 computer buddies are sharing the same username, it would look like
one person is cranking out the W.U.'s.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |