I've recently discovered this famous picture of a (I'm guessing it's a woman) ghostly figure in Austrailia. When the photo was taken, the figure
was not there. I've wondered if this part is just a piece of the actual picture taken and has been superimposed to see the white figure or the
picture taken is really that small. See for yourself.
That would be one butt ugly ghost if it was real but since the picture is so old people could have changed it since it was first taken.I have seen how
they made ghost pictures in the early days of film developing and It could be easily faked back then too.
True, very true. It's up for debate. I too believe it's real but just keep in mind that it's probably just a little piece of the picture, so we can
see the ghost. I've seen dozens of photos that have been cropped and it's more than likely it did to this picture. I also found out this picture was
taken by a reverend at a nearby church and he didn't notice the person until it was developed.
The photo is of extremely poor quality, i don't think its a ghost, there simply isn't enough detail in anything in the picture to examine it
properly- even the tree's look blurred and ghostly, and we all know that you don't get ghost tree's.
Secondly the words "the place was known for being a spot where the Aborigine tribesmen carried out terrible ceremonies in the past" doesn't sound
very plausable to me considering the westerners were very racist towards aborignies (and many still are) and it just sounds like some good old 50's
propaganda to me to make people fear and hate the local non-christian aboriginies.
The object in the picture looks causcasian, not quite sure about the history of the site, personallly doesnt ring any bells? and certianly hasnt been
reconised for being haunted in this day and age.
Propoganda? i think so to!
If there was some degree of transparency I might be inclinded to think otherwise.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.