It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by closettrekkie
Ok, ok, now hold up a minute. While I agree that the school should not have called the cops, you people are jumping to a lot of conclusions here.
So the big bad principal scares the pee out of a 12 year-old retarded girl,
Where in the article did you read that she was retarded? For someone who does such extensive research about bird flu, I'm surprised that you answered this way. The article said she was a special education student. That can mean ANYTHING! Yes, some special ed students are mentally challenged (they don't like being called "retarded"), some are physically handicapped, but there are some special ed classes that are for kids that have behavior problems also. When I went to highschool, there were classes that were called special education that was especially for all the druggies and problem children.
Originally posted by closettrekkie
I never said that they were right in calling the cops, infact I said they shouldn't have. I just said we don't have all the facts and people are starting to assume things they don't know for sure
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
My vote is for a good old-fashioned trimming of the fat. Make the government as lean and mean as possible, at the national, state, and local levels. Starvation diet - no more money until they learn to get by on a fraction of the current budget. A lot of complaining is sure to result, but if we can't learn to solve problems, instead of just throwing money at them and hoping they'll go away, we're hopeless as a nation.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
hotpinkurinalmint
Well, the point you raised in your last post may sound cruel and insensitive to some, but I happen to agree with it.
This country spends an exhorbitant amount of money on special needs kids, some of whom shouldn't even be in public school. In contrast, we spend very, very little on exceptional students, and not nearly enough on those who, as you say, just need a little help to achieve good things.
Special ed classrooms are huge money suckers - they have a much, much better student to teacher ration than the regular classrooms, and they are the darlings of every budget in every district in this country, and that's not due to compassion or love, it results from a visible pattern of budgetary blackmail.
If a school doesn't spend enough on the regular kids, nothing happens. If they fail to spend enough (defined by the parents) on the special ed kids, they get their pants sued off - which just exacerbates the financial worries of the district. The feds are supposed to pick up the tab for special ed programs (since they were the ones who wrote the rules), but they just don't. Broken promises are a dime a dozen when it comes to this crappy, overreaching, dead-beat big brother, who always collects when owed, but welches with astounding consistency when it comes time to pay some of that loot back into the public sphere.
Obviously, people with special needs, whatever they might be, deserve an education if they've paid for it with their taxes (while we're saddled with this abysmal public school system we might as well administer it fairly), but they don't deserve one tenth the education at ten or twenty times the price. Any way you slice it, that's wrong - it's a disservice to the kids, the parents, the future of this nation.
One final point, I have to make it - money is not the golden key to success in education. The best-performing districts often function on less than their under-performing 'peers', so obviously it's got less to do with money, and more to do with efficiency, creativity, and good sense.
My vote is for a good old-fashioned trimming of the fat. Make the government as lean and mean as possible, at the national, state, and local levels. Starvation diet - no more money until they learn to get by on a fraction of the current budget. A lot of complaining is sure to result, but if we can't learn to solve problems, instead of just throwing money at them and hoping they'll go away, we're hopeless as a nation.
You my friend couldn't be more wrong if you tried. You have no idea the challenges of raising a special needs kid. You have no idea the gov't red tape and abuse that is abundant. A few examples are as follows for my 5 year old autistic son:
The school system provides......... Drum roll please.............. 30 mins of group speech therapy weekly... That is it!
As a result my son has nothing! It is up to my wife and myself to fund his trust after paying his medical bills that are a bit out of hand!
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
You my friend couldn't be more wrong if you tried. You have no idea the challenges of raising a special needs kid. You have no idea the gov't red tape and abuse that is abundant. A few examples are as follows for my 5 year old autistic son:
That's funny, because I thought we were talking about education, and you go on to describe the hardships of providing medical care to an autistic child.
I don't see anywhere in my post where I commented on the cost of medical treatment, so let me do so now.
As far as I can tell, the exhorbitant cost is worsened by two primary factors. The first is abuse of intellectual property protections, which really should take a back seat to helping people. The second is a glut of litigious people who want a free ride on someone else's back.
The school system provides......... Drum roll please.............. 30 mins of group speech therapy weekly... That is it!
What do you want from them, exactly?
As a result my son has nothing! It is up to my wife and myself to fund his trust after paying his medical bills that are a bit out of hand!
I realize the vaccine link is popular, but I really think you're barking up the wrong tree. There are other sources of mercury, and they probably have more to do with your child's illness than the shots.
Even then, most kids can handle the shots, they're equipped with a metabolism that can efficiently eliminate mercury from the body. Other kids were born with a reduced ability to process the metal, and are much more sensitive to even small doses, since they compound over time. That gives big pharma a ready-made excuse, because it technically wasn't their mercury responsible, it was the underlying metabolic issue.
Anyway, isn't this a completely different discussion?
I should point out that special needs education comes nowhere close to the 10% of the education budget as you claim. I don’t have specific numbers off the top of my head but I believe the number to be much closer to 1.2 to 1.6 % of the budget.
The main point I wanted to get across is that the school system really doesn’t provide much help at all. Just 30 minuets of group therapy weekly. When I posted earlier, yes I was a bit emotional, but you exaggerations need to be put in check. And no I don’t want anything but an education from the school system for my son. Do I believe the federal government owes my son a lot especially after the laughable immunity snuck into the Patriot Act in the middle of the night, YES I do!
If we want to debate the cause of autism and immunizations I will be happy to. I have no doubt that this is the cause of my son’s situation and have plenty of research to back it up. Maybe you should start a new thread in a different section, as it wouldn’t belong here. I would be happy to debate this with you all day!
www.ed.gov...
Based on these 1999-2000 figures, total spending to educate students with disabilities including regular education, special education and other special needs programs combined represents 21.4 percent of the $360.6 billion total spending on elementary and secondary education in the United States.
eric.uoregon.edu...
In the 1997 National Survey of School District Budgets, the Educational Research Service reported that districts claimed to have spent 9.74 percent of their operating budgets for special-education instruction (Protheroe). A more recent survey of 50 states pegs total national spending for special education at $49.2 billion for 1998-99; the federal share would have comprised 7.7 percent of total expenditures, compared to 38.8 percent for states and 53.9 percent for local districts (Parrish 2000).
www.reason.com...
Nearly 12 percent of American students in kindergarten through 12th grade are assigned to the special education system. Children with severe disabilities, such as mental retardation, autism, blindness, and deafness, account for only a tenth of these students. The remaining 90 percent are described as suffering from conditions that are less obvious and harder to verify objectively, such as specific learning disability (SLD), speech and language delays, mild mental retardation, and emotional disorders.
www.heritage.org...
Unfortunately, there’s little reason to believe even these dramatic funding increases will lead to improvements in student learning in American schools. Since the early 1970s, inflation-adjusted federal spending per pupil has doubled. Over that period, student performance has not markedly improved, according to the long-term National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), which is designed to measure historical trends.