posted on Jan, 5 2007 @ 09:52 AM
I think Captain & Tennille would have been nothing without Tennille...
Actually, someone made a self-evident observation recently that photo and video evidence are almost worthless at this point. Our current level of
technology would allow this evidence to be easily manufactured or manipulated.
Now, the Billy Meier photo and video evidence was produced in the 70's, which was way before the advent of CGI and other technology could have
fabricated that stuff...because of this that evidence is very persuasive.
However, that evidence, unless you have someone who can validate the Super-8 video, or whatever film video, or still photos were taken of these craft,
then those videos and photos could also possibly be faked. Because there's a possibility that this could occur, that evidence, some of our strongest
to date, is essentially rendered useless at this point.
I wonder if back in the 70's, or even in the decades prior, that any video or photo evidence would be acceptable as validation to any spectator, and
what true value that evidence would have.
Many people would still regard the "evidence" as faked. Or if it couldn't be proved to be hoaxed, the ideology would be simply that "it wasn't
proved fake, but it wasn't proved real either", which puts us on an evidentiary merry-go-round, and unecessarily draws our attention away from the
true subject at hand - WHICH IS THE ETS.
We could argue as to whether or not there should be scientific validation of this evidence, but I think the time to analyze photo and video evidence
I say this because, despite our current ability to hoax just about any evidence, we already have what I consider irrefutable evidence that we are
being visited by ETs, and that is the hours of NASA near Earth video that's made its way onto the Internet.
You can't dispute that many of those videos show, without a doubt, intelligently controlled vehicles performing impossible feats in near-Earth orbit;
and many speeding off to who knows where. These craft are often several times the size of our own craft and still outperform anything we can even
imagine with our current physics model.
Yet, despite this powerful evidence - even though to me this proves the reality beyond a reasonable doubt, we are in a larger sense, exactly where we
were 50 years ago with regard to the subject.
If the quality of the evidence hasn't pushed us forward or closer to the truth, the quantity definitely has. Between the NASA tapes, the Mexican UFO
Conference, Billy Meier evidence, and other phenomenal video and photo evidence we have gone as far as we can with this type of evidence.
The photos and videos that we've seen, as evidence, have gone as far as they can go. The NASA video, however, was one of the few things that at this
point was the last seeming hope for video/photo evidence, because it was captured by an extension of the U.S. government, and the feats took place
just outside of our atmosphere, which lead to some astounding video.
We need to, however, as Prote suggests, move away from that type of evidence now. If stronger evidence were to be made available to the larger segment
of planet via photo and video evidence it would have been done by now.
The strongest video and photo evidence right now is coming right out of NASA and the U.S. government, but this evidence has its limits.
All of us can think of how a video of a landing, ET contact, and a walk on board an ET craft could be the be all and end all of evidence, but at this
point, there is too much of a possibility that this could be faked, which shows the limits of using this sort of evidence now. It's virtually
If you have witnessed these videos, and the plethora of photo evidence out there, then that evidence has served its purpose; namely, for you to make
up your mind with regard to that particular kind of evidence (i.e., either you believe we are being visited, or you don't, period.).
So the obvious question is, What now?
For those who are convinced we are being visited, this conviction, in the face of a seemingly stalemated movement - a revelation that appears to be
spinning its wheels - only leads to the aching question of "When?".
When will this amazing reality come into full, undeniable, irreversible and unquestioned contact with our own reality, and physically,
technologically, spiritually, psychologically and socially move our relationship with our universe TO THE NEXT LEVEL - on a worldwide scale?
Everyone following this phenomena - which is a form of contact - have already shifted our consciousness not only to accept the reality of the
existence of other intelligent beings visiting our planet, but have mentally prepared for what we consider would be an open and personally verifiable
instance(es) of contact.
The pursuit of evidence has run its course. I think there is enough out there for anyone to make up their minds.
If they still have not after reviewing all available evidence - and this includes official testimony, physical evidence, photos and video, government
documentation - the list goes on for decades, then those people not only have inpenetrable belief systems, but they are also in for a rude awakening
when what the rest of us are eager to occur actually comes to pass.
I would suggest that what the people are looking for - the people who have tired of the stalemate that exists despite the mountain of evidence - is
now an open conversation - not just contact - in a personally verifiable way, in a way we can understand, AND A TIME FRAME IN WHICH THIS IS TO
The conversation so far has been one sided. We want to contribute, and we want it NOW!
I think we can go on suggesting the ways that contact would be indisputable; that a mass landing would prove it once and for all, etc., but I don't
think evidence is the question anymore. I think the question is "WHEN?"
Until then, any evidence will be nothing more than an amusement; a conversation piece...but I think I'm tired of looking at photos and video. I'm
ready for the real deal...