It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2007

page: 20
14
<< 17  18  19    21  22  23 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 15 2007 @ 08:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by Duby78

here's what FoxNews say:

FoxNews is wrong
Watch them update soon and blame "computer-glitches", etc. USGS still has only one quake at Mag 7.5. Reuters, FoxNews, etc. all use USGS as a source, so...




posted on Aug, 15 2007 @ 08:23 PM
link   
A couple of aftershocks...


USGS: Magnitude 5.8 - CENTRAL PERU
2007 August 16 00:02:41 UTC



USGS: Magnitude 5.9 - NEAR THE COAST OF CENTRAL PERU
2007 August 16 00:19:09 UTC



edit: correction:
Actually, they were not really aftershocks as they occured in different places. Too far from the initial quake, but most likely triggered by the mag 7.5 quake...

adding a map. click map for updated map.



***

Where will the next big one hit? Himalayas?


At least one - and possibly as many as seven - magnitude 8.1 to 8.3 earthquakes are overdue along the Himalayas


[edit on 2007/8/15 by Hellmutt]



posted on Aug, 15 2007 @ 09:15 PM
link   
USGS has adjusted the first one up to 7.9 with 4 aftershocks of 5+ as of 10:15 EST.

MAP 5.4 2007/08/16 01:35:40 -14.086 -76.546 35.0 NEAR THE COAST OF CENTRAL PERU
MAP 5.9 2007/08/16 01:02:20 -13.308 -76.528 10.0 NEAR THE COAST OF CENTRAL PERU
MAP 5.9 2007/08/16 00:19:11 -14.231 -76.180 10.0 NEAR THE COAST OF CENTRAL PERU
MAP 5.8 2007/08/16 00:02:42 -12.645 -75.508 31.2 CENTRAL PERU
MAP 7.9 2007/08/15 23:40:58 -13.322 -76.508 40.7 NEAR THE COAST OF CENTRAL PERU



posted on Aug, 15 2007 @ 09:16 PM
link   
CNN is now saying it has been upgrated to a 7.9!!!!!

Watches and warnings up the US pacific coast all the way up to Alaska!!!



posted on Aug, 16 2007 @ 01:52 AM
link   
One of the aftershocks was a 6.3, thats quite big.

Main now at 7.9 by USGS, 8.0 by EMSC. Same difference if you were near it though.

Heres a couple of plots of it. I'm guessing that the second large spike may be why some places reported multiple quakes.





[edit on 16-8-2007 by apex]



posted on Aug, 16 2007 @ 03:52 AM
link   
USGS: Magnitude 6.7 - SOLOMON ISLANDS
2007 August 16 08:39:31 UTC



it's shaking alot around the world...





click for updated map...


[edit on 2007/8/16 by Hellmutt]



posted on Aug, 17 2007 @ 01:42 AM
link   
Well I wasn't looking at the USGS quake site after the Indonesian Tsunami quake, but I'd guess it may be due to that big one in Peru. It has now been upgraded to a full magnitude 8 as well. Only 10 times smaller than the Indian Ocean Tsunami one.

Magnitude 6.2 - BANDA SEA
2007 August 17 03:04:03 UTC
Depth 10km


[edit on 17-8-2007 by apex]



posted on Aug, 18 2007 @ 11:22 AM
link   



posted on Aug, 26 2007 @ 01:04 PM
link   
Let me guess: everything is within normal activity, number of earthquakes is within the average range. Right, apex?



posted on Aug, 26 2007 @ 02:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by swimmer
Let me guess: everything is within normal activity, number of earthquakes is within the average range. Right, apex?


Let me guess, everything is going crazy, and the current number of earthquakes is a clear indicator that we're all going to die. Right, swimmer?


Edit; sorry, couldn't resist.

Well, there have been a few, but i've definitely seen more on the charts than at the moment. The USA only maps though, are quite high in number as I type this, at 777.

[edit on 26-8-2007 by apex]



posted on Aug, 26 2007 @ 03:40 PM
link   
So, you have seen more than this...no big deal, huh?

Well, why are you even reporting the earthquakes, without any comments on damage, victims, anything? You have no comments on the nature of earthquakes, and see no patterns...nothing.

So, what's the point? We can searh and find officially registered earthquakes, we do not need you to copy and paste info here...but if it makes you happy, keep on doing it.

It is nice to know that there are smart people like you, who do not panic like us mortals. It so happens that your information is EXACTLY the same as official one, so we should be proud of you. You are so official.



posted on Aug, 26 2007 @ 03:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by swimmer
So, you have seen more than this...no big deal, huh?


Well I can't remember seeing a larger number of quakes than normal and massive catastrophes and worldwide panic like you say there should be.


Well, why are you even reporting the earthquakes, without any comments on damage, victims, anything? You have no comments on the nature of earthquakes, and see no patterns...nothing.

So, what's the point? We can searh and find officially registered earthquakes, we do not need you to copy and paste info here...but if it makes you happy, keep on doing it.


Tell me what we are meant to do with it then. Start your own thread and do it your way. As you know so much about it, you can do all you want with it. Seeing as you want the service done a different way, you can provide it. If people want that, fair enough.


It is nice to know that there are smart people like you, who do not panic like us mortals. It so happens that your information is EXACTLY the same as official one, so we should be proud of you. You are so official.


So what source do you want then?

Anyway

D'ENTRECASTEAUX ISLANDS REGION
2007-08-26 at 13:47:00.8 UTC
Magnitude 5.6
Depth 10km


Whats with Manchester?

2007 08 23 05 34 48.2 53.477 -2.183 387.9 397.9 3.4 1.4 MANCHESTER

2007 08 23 05 26 26.1 53.486 -2.175 388.4 398.9 3.2 1.8 MANCHESTER

2007 08 23 01 35 10.4 53.490 -2.196 387.0 399.3 3.6 1.7 MANCHESTER 2 FELT MANCHESTER

2007 08 10 12 25 59.0 53.498 -2.122 391.9 400.2 5.4 1.6 MANCHESTER 3 FELT MANCHESTER

2007 08 10 10 50 11.0 53.495 -2.175 388.4 399.9 4.0 2.5 MANCHESTER 4 FELT MANCHESTER



posted on Sep, 1 2007 @ 02:34 PM
link   



posted on Sep, 1 2007 @ 08:23 PM
link   



posted on Sep, 1 2007 @ 08:49 PM
link   
The link doesn't come up anymore Hellmutt for the Santa Cruz quake - was it deleted?



posted on Sep, 1 2007 @ 09:03 PM
link   
reply to post by trek315
 


Yup, it was deleted. There's a new link now, and the quake has been downgraded to a 6.9. Big difference between a 7.4 and a 6.9...

USGS: Magnitude 6.9 - SANTA CRUZ ISLANDS
2007 September 02 01:05:19 UTC



posted on Sep, 2 2007 @ 12:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by Hellmutt
reply to post by trek315
 


Yup, it was deleted. There's a new link now, and the quake has been downgraded to a 6.9. Big difference between a 7.4 and a 6.9...



Yes, a 7.4 is, I think, 3 times bigger than a 6.9. And the old link would have been preliminary.




top topics



 
14
<< 17  18  19    21  22  23 >>

log in

join