It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by soficrow
kallikak
Back to the problem of microbial mutation.
Can you explain in simple language how mutation occurs, at the molecular level? What happens? What are the mechanisms and processes? What molecules are involved? What happens to the molecules?
Thanks.
sofi
Originally posted by Long Lance
...over-reliance on antibiotics, hmmm, feeding kilotons of antibiotics to cattle had nothing to do with the emergence of resistancies but anyone who warns aganst the industry's madness is considered a doomsayer.
"The overprescription of antibiotics, and the use of antibiotics in animal feed, and use of antibiotics in all the cleaning products have created an environment whereby the weaker bacteria are dying off, leaving the stronger bacteria to be even stronger,"
How antibiotic resistant superbugs win out in the wild
The university team discovered that when low levels of antibiotics were introduced – as little as 15% of the level normally needed to kill the ordinary bacteria – the resistant strain became dominant after just a few divisions.
“In places like hospital corridors or wards, or on farms where antibiotics are routinely fed to cows in feedstock to limit infections, there is a constant low level exposure to antibiotics which encourages the resistant strains to succeed, especially if there are already a few resistant bacteria about”, says Dr Fleming and Mr Mc Cay....
Administering too low a level of antibiotics can cause a much more dangerous and long lasting infection by encouraging a resistant strain of bacteria to emerge. It is also important that the patient finishes their course of antibiotics so that infectious bugs are completely eliminated from the body. Disinfectant resistant bacteria are also emerging with increased use, and the scientists think this may be contributing to the problem through cross resistance.
Originally posted by soficrow
Thanks kallikak.
I was looking for simple language and accessible terminology - to 'hook' and inform readers without biology backgrounds. ...It's a hard job.
And oh yeah, I was hoping you'd mention proteins, not just plasmids.
Originally posted by soficrow
Also - antibiotic resistant soaps and lotions play a huge role in creating resistant bacteria.
Thing again is the vast majority of people who receive antibiotics shouldn't their immune system will deal with the problem... it might take a little longer, but in the interest of public health it's worth it.
Plus, everyone who gets an antibiotic hit - animals and people - pees the extra out into our waste systems and waterways.
Which might help explain where the new virulent E. coli mutations came from, and why they now can infect plants...
Originally posted by kallikak
Antibiotic resistance exists naturally as a consequence of the existence of antibiotics.
How antibiotic resistant superbugs win out in the wild
The university team discovered that when low levels of antibiotics were introduced – as little as 15% of the level normally needed to kill the ordinary bacteria – the resistant strain became dominant after just a few divisions.
“In places like hospital corridors or wards, or on farms where antibiotics are routinely fed to cows in feedstock to limit infections, there is a constant low level exposure to antibiotics which encourages the resistant strains to succeed, especially if there are already a few resistant bacteria about”, says Dr Fleming and Mr Mc Cay. “Our results suggest that hospitals need to re-evaluate the minimum levels of treatments they think will stop infections, and include data on the way bacteria are selected and survive as well”.
Administering too low a level of antibiotics can cause a much more dangerous and long lasting infection by encouraging a resistant strain of bacteria to emerge. It is also important that the patient finishes their course of antibiotics so that infectious bugs are completely eliminated from the body. Disinfectant resistant bacteria are also emerging with increased use, and the scientists think this may be contributing to the problem through cross resistance.
And oh yeah, I was hoping you'd mention proteins, not just plasmids.
Sorry... I mentioned them above... though I know it wasn't in the context you were hoping. In any case... I don't exactly see the protein products as being entirely relevant ... unless you're talking about the apparatus that does the transferring.
Originally posted by soficrow
But surely you agree that we're doing a LOT wrong in our society - and forcing antibiotic resistance to develop?
Specifically - using human antibiotics in agricultural industries, marketing antibiotic cosmetics, etc. All at low level doses that select for resistance and virulence.
BTW - phages would mutate along with resistant bacteria. What do you think of going back to phages?
Exactly.
As you say, antibiotics target proteins - and they work by ...??? Doing what, precisely?
btw - I suspect prions are the primary mechanism required for the evolutionary process. So "prion pollution" can be seen as forcing evolution, as well as directing it.
Originally posted by kallikak
Originally posted by soficrow
But surely you agree that we're doing a LOT wrong in our society - and forcing antibiotic resistance to develop?
Well... for the most part... but I am just being nitpicky. If you change the word develop to spread, I'll be in complete agreement.
Administering too low a level of antibiotics can cause a much more dangerous and long lasting infection by encouraging a resistant strain of bacteria to emerge.
Originally posted by soficrow
??? Nitpicky? ???
Factory farms routinely administer low level antibiotics to prevent acute disease. Which encourages resistant strains to emerge. Ie., develop.
Originally posted by kallikak
I am employed in a technical writing capacity, and it makes me a stickler for word choice. Sorry.
A recent edition of the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ) carried an unusually grim warning. A "pathogen combining virulence, resistance and an ability to disseminate at large," it cautioned, is poised "to emerge in force" in Canada.
Also, it causes pus-filled sores, lung abscesses and the occasional case of flesh-eating disease.
The bacterium is generally found inside the nose or on the skin of otherwise healthy people. An infection first appears as a red, tender area, then swells into a boil. When it's not treated properly, the abscesses spread and can grow to the size of "a grapefruit," one of the study's authors said.
From there, fever and other flu-like symptoms appear. In some cases, patients develop bleeding in the lungs.
Superbug 'apocalypse' warning
An expert in infection control warns today of a looming healthcare apocalypse as MRSA and other superbugs spread and the world runs out of antibiotics to treat those infected.
Richard James, director of a new national research centre dedicated to the fight against spread of infections, launched at the University of Nottingham yesterday, says there is an impending crisis on the horizon.
"We are facing a future where there will be no antibiotics and hospital will be the last place to be if you want to avoid picking up a dangerous bacterial infection - in effect, cut your finger on Monday and you'll be dead by Friday if there's nothing to prevent it," he says. "Quite frankly, the impending crisis on the horizon can be called the 'post-antibiotic apocalypse'."
Medic warns of MRSA super bug danger to people rearing pigs
Brussels, Jan 6, IRNA
A Belgian doctor of microbiology and infectious diseases is warning of the danger to people rearing and handling pigs.
The warning by Dr. Bart Gordts of Sint-Jan Hospital in Bruges follows a case in which an abattoir worker in the Flanders region was infected with MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) a multi-drug resistant bacteria the so-called super bug.
Today more and more pigs are carriers of MRSA bacteria, it noted.
***
MRSA lawsuits ten times higher than previously thought
New released figures show a rise in the number of MRSA-related compensation claims, raising questions as to whether the threat of litigation can be used as a policy instrument to pressure the NHS on infection control.
The NHS Litigation Authority has revised the number of cases involving healthcare-associated infections covering the period of April 2002 to March 2006 from seven to 68. It has also revealed that £5m was paid out in damages and £3m in costs during this time.
News of the payouts was welcomed by injury lawyers who are now using health and safety laws to hold the NHS accountable on MRSA. This is made possible because Control of Substances Harmful to Health (COSHH) regulations, that require employers to control exposure to hazardous substances to prevent ill health, also cover biological agents such as bacteria and other micro-organisms.
Heterosexual transmission of community-acquired MRSA
Evidence has emerged of heterosexual transmission of community-acquired MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. In the February 1st edition of Clinical Infectious Diseases investigators from New York provide detailed information on three heterosexual couples where there was evidence of sexual transmission of MRSA and also provide details of a prospective, community-based study involving individuals who had been diagnosed with community-acquired MRSA that found that the pubic region was the site of infection in 3% of cases.
Originally posted by ben91069
What are the symptoms of this? Does anyone know or have a link?
Also, why is it an epidemic, when I know of no one who has it?