It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stumason
Typical FlyersFan "Anti-UN" tripe.
What FF seems to ignore, when convenient, is that UN forces are made up, primarily, of developing countries forces. Bangladesh is one of the lead providers of troops, in fact. They are not the same professional calibre as some of our Armed Forces. Mostly, they are illiterate, poorly trained conscripts.
This isn't a UN problem, in that, it isn't the UN causing it.
It is to do with the troops and the countries of origin. These are horrible crimes, granted, but nothing that has stemmed from the UN.
Originally posted by Murphs
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by stumason
What FF seems to ignore, when convenient, is that UN forces are made up, primarily, of developing countries forces. Bangladesh is one of the lead providers of troops, in fact. They are not the same professional calibre as some of our Armed Forces. Mostly, they are illiterate, poorly trained conscripts.
Oh I get it! Its the fault of poor minority animals from 3rd world countries!
They cant help but rape. They lack the sophisticated breeding of white folk.
Why not hold the employer responsable? Until they take a zero tolerance position theyre just enabling it. Like during WWI and WWII if anyone gets caught raping, robing or stealing they should just be hanged.
Same goes for our (U.S.) troop. Think of how different all this Abu Ghrab crap would have turned out if we simply grabed the offending parties and hung them right there in the prison.
These troops regardless of how poor they are or how black their skin may be still represent the greater nation and should be considered as ambassadors. Unless the nation wants to be represented as mindless thugs who rape and steal they should be dealt with absolutely and terminally to be examples for the rest of the troops and the rest of the nations to follw.
No, don't hold the employer responsible...That is what is wrong with the western world..No-one takes any personal responsibility or accountability.
anymore.
It was my upbringing, it was my teacher, if my employer hadn't off done XYZ, I wouldn't have done AB or C..
Everyone take some personal responsibility for once and stop blaming others!
These women and children have to live with this sexual, psychological and physical violation for the rest of their lives..! They have to deal with it, let the rapists!
There is alot of fear in and off the military particularly in regions like Sudan but within the world in general..People seem unable to open their mouths..It is time they did and identify the offenders..
Collegues are going to have to tout on collegues..It could be sons wife, mother, sister or daughter..
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by Murphs
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by stumason
What FF seems to ignore, when convenient, is that UN forces are made up, primarily, of developing countries forces. Bangladesh is one of the lead providers of troops, in fact. They are not the same professional calibre as some of our Armed Forces. Mostly, they are illiterate, poorly trained conscripts.
Oh I get it! Its the fault of poor minority animals from 3rd world countries!
They cant help but rape. They lack the sophisticated breeding of white folk.
Why not hold the employer responsable? Until they take a zero tolerance position theyre just enabling it. Like during WWI and WWII if anyone gets caught raping, robing or stealing they should just be hanged.
Same goes for our (U.S.) troop. Think of how different all this Abu Ghrab crap would have turned out if we simply grabed the offending parties and hung them right there in the prison.
These troops regardless of how poor they are or how black their skin may be still represent the greater nation and should be considered as ambassadors. Unless the nation wants to be represented as mindless thugs who rape and steal they should be dealt with absolutely and terminally to be examples for the rest of the troops and the rest of the nations to follw.
No, don't hold the employer responsible...That is what is wrong with the western world..No-one takes any personal responsibility or accountability.
anymore.
It was my upbringing, it was my teacher, if my employer hadn't off done XYZ, I wouldn't have done AB or C..
Everyone take some personal responsibility for once and stop blaming others!
These women and children have to live with this sexual, psychological and physical violation for the rest of their lives..! They have to deal with it, let the rapists!
There is alot of fear in and off the military particularly in regions like Sudan but within the world in general..People seem unable to open their mouths..It is time they did and identify the offenders..
Collegues are going to have to tout on collegues..It could be sons wife, mother, sister or daughter..
Sorry "Murps" if thought Id ever take personal responsability off the table. Nobody mad a rapist rape. Did you read my whole post?
"Why not hold the employer responsable? Until they take a zero tolerance position theyre just enabling it. Like during WWI and WWII if anyone gets caught raping, robing or stealing they should just be hanged."
It would be like not firing a bad employee even though you knew he was worthless then having the account complain about the shddy work YOUR employee is doing. He shouldve been fired. Just like these rapists should be hanged.
Sorry if you think thats making excuses and passing the blame like some liberal would do.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Wrong. These peacekeepers operate under the auspices of a command structure created by the UN. They in effect ARE the UN. The UN would be only too happy to grab credit for any of their successes; they must also accept responsibility for their failures.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Originally posted by stumason
Typical FlyersFan "Anti-UN" tripe.
What FF seems to ignore, when convenient, is that UN forces are made up, primarily, of developing countries forces. Bangladesh is one of the lead providers of troops, in fact. They are not the same professional calibre as some of our Armed Forces. Mostly, they are illiterate, poorly trained conscripts.
This isn't a UN problem, in that, it isn't the UN causing it.
It is to do with the troops and the countries of origin. These are horrible crimes, granted, but nothing that has stemmed from the UN.
Wrong. These peacekeepers operate under the auspices of a command structure created by the UN. They in effect ARE the UN. The UN would be only too happy to grab credit for any of their successes; they must also accept responsibility for their failures.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Originally posted by jsobecky
Wrong. These peacekeepers operate under the auspices of a command structure created by the UN. They in effect ARE the UN. The UN would be only too happy to grab credit for any of their successes; they must also accept responsibility for their failures.
So, when dealing with US soldiers raping and burning families:
These peacekeepers operate under the auspices of a command structure created by the US. They in effect ARE the US. The US would be only too happy to grab credit for any of their successes; they must also accept responsibility for their failures.
Is that fair?
Oh I get it! Its the fault of poor minority animals from 3rd world countries!
They cant help but rape. They lack the sophisticated breeding of white folk.
Why not hold the employer responsable? Until they take a zero tolerance position theyre just enabling it. Like during WWI and WWII if anyone gets caught raping, robing or stealing they should just be hanged.
Same goes for our (U.S.) troop. Think of how different all this Abu Ghrab crap would have turned out if we simply grabed the offending parties and hung them right there in the prison.
These troops regardless of how poor they are or how black their skin may be still represent the greater nation and should be considered as ambassadors. Unless the nation wants to be represented as mindless thugs who rape and steal they should be dealt with absolutely and terminally to be examples for the rest of the troops and the rest of the nations to follw.
Wrong. These peacekeepers operate under the auspices of a command structure created by the UN. They in effect ARE the UN. The UN would be only too happy to grab credit for any of their successes; they must also accept responsibility for their failures.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Originally posted by jsobecky
Wrong. These peacekeepers operate under the auspices of a command structure created by the UN. They in effect ARE the UN. The UN would be only too happy to grab credit for any of their successes; they must also accept responsibility for their failures.
So, when dealing with US soldiers raping and burning families:
These peacekeepers operate under the auspices of a command structure created by the US. They in effect ARE the US. The US would be only too happy to grab credit for any of their successes; they must also accept responsibility for their failures.
Is that fair?
I got a solution for that. Cut them off of the U.S. money and end our involvement with them once and for all. U.S. out of U.N.. We could charge them offensive rent for their use of the U.N. building or sell it off to Trump and let him make some condos.
Originally posted by Murphs
Have a wee look, honey..You actually owe them a small fortune!
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by Murphs
Have a wee look, honey..You actually owe them a small fortune!
Okay, www.globalpolicy.org...
so welch on our debt and get out of the U.N.. Whats the difference?
Wash our hands of them.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by Murphs
Have a wee look, honey..You actually owe them a small fortune!
Okay, www.globalpolicy.org...
so welch on our debt and get out of the U.N.. Whats the difference?
Wash our hands of them.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Originally posted by jsobecky
Wrong. These peacekeepers operate under the auspices of a command structure created by the UN. They in effect ARE the UN. The UN would be only too happy to grab credit for any of their successes; they must also accept responsibility for their failures.
So, when dealing with US soldiers raping and burning families:
These peacekeepers operate under the auspices of a command structure created by the US. They in effect ARE the US. The US would be only too happy to grab credit for any of their successes; they must also accept responsibility for their failures.
Is that fair?
I got a solution for that. Cut them off of the U.S. money and end our involvement with them once and for all. U.S. out of U.N.. We could charge them offensive rent for their use of the U.N. building or sell it off to Trump and let him make some condos.
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Originally posted by jsobecky
Wrong. These peacekeepers operate under the auspices of a command structure created by the UN. They in effect ARE the UN. The UN would be only too happy to grab credit for any of their successes; they must also accept responsibility for their failures.
So, when dealing with US soldiers raping and burning families:
These peacekeepers operate under the auspices of a command structure created by the US. They in effect ARE the US. The US would be only too happy to grab credit for any of their successes; they must also accept responsibility for their failures.
Is that fair?
I got a solution for that. Cut them off of the U.S. money and end our involvement with them once and for all. U.S. out of U.N.. We could charge them offensive rent for their use of the U.N. building or sell it off to Trump and let him make some condos.
You do realise that what you said has nothing to with what he said, right?
You entirely and completely missed the point.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Originally posted by jsobecky
Wrong. These peacekeepers operate under the auspices of a command structure created by the UN. They in effect ARE the UN. The UN would be only too happy to grab credit for any of their successes; they must also accept responsibility for their failures.
So, when dealing with US soldiers raping and burning families:
These peacekeepers operate under the auspices of a command structure created by the US. They in effect ARE the US. The US would be only too happy to grab credit for any of their successes; they must also accept responsibility for their failures.
Is that fair?
I got a solution for that. Cut them off of the U.S. money and end our involvement with them once and for all. U.S. out of U.N.. We could charge them offensive rent for their use of the U.N. building or sell it off to Trump and let him make some condos.
You do realise that what you said has nothing to with what he said, right?
You entirely and completely missed the point.
If we bail out then we cant get blamed for anything they do and we cant get the credit for anything they do.
Thats exactly on the point of what he said.
Originally posted by Murphs
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Originally posted by jsobecky
Wrong. These peacekeepers operate under the auspices of a command structure created by the UN. They in effect ARE the UN. The UN would be only too happy to grab credit for any of their successes; they must also accept responsibility for their failures.
So, when dealing with US soldiers raping and burning families:
These peacekeepers operate under the auspices of a command structure created by the US. They in effect ARE the US. The US would be only too happy to grab credit for any of their successes; they must also accept responsibility for their failures.
Is that fair?
I got a solution for that. Cut them off of the U.S. money and end our involvement with them once and for all. U.S. out of U.N.. We could charge them offensive rent for their use of the U.N. building or sell it off to Trump and let him make some condos.
You do realise that what you said has nothing to with what he said, right?
You entirely and completely missed the point.
If we bail out then we cant get blamed for anything they do and we cant get the credit for anything they do.
Thats exactly on the point of what he said.
Ahhhhh but you will be seen as defectors and cowards..Can't cope with debts or the heat!!
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by Murphs
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Originally posted by jsobecky
Wrong. These peacekeepers operate under the auspices of a command structure created by the UN. They in effect ARE the UN. The UN would be only too happy to grab credit for any of their successes; they must also accept responsibility for their failures.
So, when dealing with US soldiers raping and burning families:
These peacekeepers operate under the auspices of a command structure created by the US. They in effect ARE the US. The US would be only too happy to grab credit for any of their successes; they must also accept responsibility for their failures.
Is that fair?
I got a solution for that. Cut them off of the U.S. money and end our involvement with them once and for all. U.S. out of U.N.. We could charge them offensive rent for their use of the U.N. building or sell it off to Trump and let him make some condos.
You do realise that what you said has nothing to with what he said, right?
You entirely and completely missed the point.
If we bail out then we cant get blamed for anything they do and we cant get the credit for anything they do.
Thats exactly on the point of what he said.
Ahhhhh but you will be seen as defectors and cowards..Can't cope with debts or the heat!!
Wait, I thought everyone wants us to be defectors and cowards? Running from Iraq and all.
Hell, if it would reduce my tax burden Id stop dealing with any foreign country, pull our money out of everywhere and build a big 'ol wall.
Kill all the U.S. foreign aid and let Maliki rebuild his own country. Hes the President. If Iran rolls in and takes over so be it.
Screw the name calling. Coward and defector. So what? Havent you learned sticks and stones yet?
Originally posted by jsobecky
What's that supposed to mean? "Oh, there have been cases of US soldiers raping, so we'll just overlook this". Is that what we should think?
You don't excuse bad behavior by pointing to other bad behavior. Most of us learned that when we were children.
And how can you defend these atrocities, esp. on such a grand scale?
Not the questions you are asking, they don't. Why don't you ask for the reasons this mass raping has been allowed to go on for so long, with nothing being done about it? Instead, you just turn it into another tired old USA bashing thread.
I'm sure the PRC would happily take up the US's position as the largst super power in the UN , along with the politcal presdige that comes with it. If you wish to leave then leave, the doors there....but then again its only been a hamper to US foriegn policy since the begining..I mean who says the US cant execute a leader?
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
I got a solution for that. Cut them off of the U.S. money and end our involvement with them once and for all. U.S. out of U.N.. We could charge them offensive rent for their use of the U.N. building or sell it off to Trump and let him make some condos.
Originally posted by devilwasp
Whos exscusing anything, I'm merely pointing out this is not some grand isolated incident, soldiers do this! Sorry but soldiers are humans too, I know its difficult to believe sometimes when you see what they have to do but they are still human and can make mistakes and can do bad things.