This topic is in the New World Order discussion forum.  (rss)


SONS OF LIBERTY




Topic started on 15-11-2002 @ 09:57 PM by ThE PROBLEM 911


were they ever involved in a new world order or were they part of the freemasons?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-11-2002 @ 10:10 PM by FreeMason


Some were Freemasons, but I can't remember how many, the number was not all too staggering, and unlike many who claim otherwise, they didn't organize their efforts in a Masonic Lodge.

Sincerely,
no signature



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-11-2002 @ 11:48 PM by Ma-Ha-Bone


S ons O f L iberty. SOL, the sun... you do the math.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-11-2002 @ 10:03 AM by Byrd


Which ones?

The original ones were secret societies of extremists who helped start the American Revolution. As FM said, doubtless some were Masons, and some weren't: earlyamerica.com...

But if you do a search on "Sons of Liberty" you also come up with a number of modern groups which seem to be fairly extremist and conspiracy-oriented. I doubt that there are many Masons in any of those.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-11-2002 @ 09:55 PM by Ma-Ha-Bone


at the history of Freemasonry and all of its members in the political arena, it should become clear that fomenting revolution was almost the entire purpose of the organization. Political intrigue, assassination, deception, slanderous media campaigns, all of which were designed to create THEIR desired changes.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-11-2002 @ 01:13 AM by FreeMason


You can't relate the Sons of Liberty of the 1700s to the Freemasons, as I said some might have been Freemasons, but the Sons of Liberty had their own agenda, they were doing their OWN thing. Remember, Freemasonry originated in England, General Lord Cornwallis as well as all 3 major English Generals in the Revolutionary war were all Freemasons...bet you didn't know that one.

It is not like Freemasonry put all its power behind the birth of a Democracy, its creed says to always pledge your loyalty to your country, therefore the Revolution was an action of men, not fraternity.

Freemasonry's largest contribution to the U.S. was not an instigation of rebellion or the formation of the declaration, but the government which still stands today. If you hadn't noticed, the federalism of the U.S. is a near copy of the Lodge government of Freemasonry. Only a little more centralized with there being a President.

Sincerely,
no signature

PS. I'd look it up but I'm busy, I know Lord Cornwallis was a Freemason, I'm sure that the Comander in Cheif of the Brittish Army in the Americas (I forget his name howe?) was one, and I'm also kinda sure that there was a third, you can research more on it if you want, and if need be I'll find the sources myself.

But still, point is Freemasonry was as much on the torries side as was it on the yanks, Sons of Liberty was only on the Yanks side.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:












ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

, , , , ,
















ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.111 seconds
Page processed in 0.063 seconds
7 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread