It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Newz Forum: BASEBALL: Man sues Phillies after losing vision at game

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 6 2005 @ 09:27 AM
link   
HARRISBURG, Pa. -- A dentist who lost some of his vision after he was beaned at a Philadelphia Phillies game is suing the team, alleging that not enough was done to protect spectators.

Neil Pakett, of Elkins Park, would have been protected during the June 25, 2001, game at Veterans Stadium if the backstop was wide enough to meet the recommendations of the Architectural Graphic Standards and had been angled differently, according to court documents citing an expert hired by Pakett's lawyer.

Pakett was struck when a foul ball flew off the bat of Phillies shortstop Jimmy Rollins, who was batting left-handed. Pakett attempted to catch the ball, instead of protecting himself, according to court documents.

Both the city of Philadelphia and the Phillies are defendants in the case.

A Philadelphia Common Pleas judge dismissed the Phillies from the case in October, but Pakett appealed to the state Commonwealth Court. Oral arguments in the case are scheduled for March 3.

A lawyer retained by the team, Robert J. Foster, said that decades of case law dictates that fans take on the responsibility of protecting themselves when they attend a sporting event, such as baseball.

Among the protections cited by Philadelphia judge Joseph I. Papalini were warnings by the public announcer, on the back of every ticket, on signs posted on walkways and between concourses, and by a video cartoon that is played in the middle of the first inning.

Papalini also cited the "no-duty" rule of Pennsylvania's courts, which holds that operators of a baseball stadium, amusement park or other such facilities are not bound to protect or warn spectators from "common, frequent, and expected" risks that are part of the activity.

Pakett's attorneys contend that the no-duty rule does not apply because the team chose to protect some spectators, but not others, when it erected the backstop.

Pakett and his attorney, Frederic Eisenberg, did not return messages left Friday. Pakett, who underwent surgery for the injury, suffered temporary blindness and has not regained all of his sight, according to the suit. Pakett was seeking more than $50,000 in damages, Foster said.

source

ESPN




posted on Feb, 6 2005 @ 03:42 PM
link   
It's too bad about this man's vision loss but in defense of the ballpark, one of the first things they tell you is to be aware of foul balls and that you are at your own risk. I'll bet next time he brings a glove.



posted on Feb, 6 2005 @ 04:49 PM
link   
Yeah, I'd say you go to a sporting event, you should beware of flying objects, isn't that commen sense?



posted on Feb, 6 2005 @ 04:50 PM
link   
It did say he tried to catch the ball so it wasn't like he wasn't paying attention. He just didn't make a very good outfielder, better stick with his day job. I hope he doesn't miss teeth that bad.



posted on Feb, 6 2005 @ 04:52 PM
link   
Pakett was struck when a foul ball flew off the bat of Phillies shortstop Jimmy Rollins, who was batting left-handed. Pakett attempted to catch the ball, instead of protecting himself, according to court documents

sounds ike he was actually one of the seahawk's receivers this year



posted on Feb, 7 2005 @ 10:44 AM
link   
You've got to know when to cover up when the ball is coming.




TRD

posted on Feb, 7 2005 @ 01:27 PM
link   
How can he ask for compensation?

If he tried to catch it and missed, obviously his eyesight was already bad!

Sounds like one of the cowgirls wide recievers..



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join