Recently, I told you about football writers getting grief for the way they voted in the AP poll which affects the BCS rankings. I told you that some
of them might opt out of the voting by wrapping the mantle of "journalistic objectivity" around themselves. Well, the AP itself has saved them that
embarrassment.
The AP now declares that they do not want their poll used by the BCS in any way The AP has sent a "cease and desist letter" to the BCS folks telling
them that their "unauthorized use of the AP poll has harmed AP's reputation and interfered with AP's agreements with AP poll voters." Now let me get
this straight. AP publishes the results of its poll because it thinks it is newsworthy and valuable information. However, once it is published and in
the public domain, another group cannot use that information because said information is insufficiently valid to draw an unambiguous conclusion and
that harms AP's reputation.
Memo to Associated Press:
1. Get over yourselves.
2. Stop publishing your silly-assed poll if using its results harms your reputation.
3. What might be the journalistic response to a government agency/official who sent a similar “cease-and-desist letter” to AP because they think
AP might be using some statistical measure to damage the reputation of the agency/official? Can you spell hypocrisy? Oh, I forgot, you guys have
editors who check spelling for you...
While the AP postures and attempts to seize the moral high ground in a situation where the high ground is at the bottom of a cesspool, the football
coaches of America - or whatever their organization likes to call itself, has categorically refused to release the votes of the members that generate
the so-called "coaches poll". Some folks have asked what these people have to hide. Here is what I think. There are probably some coaches who never
fill out any of the ballots and have their secretaries/admin assistants/straphangers fill out the forms. If the results were made available to the
public, the coach might then be asked why he voted for one school over another and he might not have realized he did that... Just my hypothesis.
Oh, by the way, would anyone care at all if people stopped using this poll in any way that is related to the selection of BCS bowl match-ups? I didn't
think so.
Legalisms and college football are intersecting in other portions of the space-time continuum. Jackie Sherrill is suing the NCAA claiming that the
NCAA's decision to investigate his football program at Mississippi State is what caused the administration there to fire his ass. I guess that final
season with a 2-9 record had nothing to do with that decision on the part of the school. Neither did the outcome of the investigation that resulted in
probation and recruiting restrictions. I'm pretty much on record as being antagonistic to the NCAA as a feckless and generally useless organization
run by hypocrites and ideologues; but in this case, I hope they win in a walk.
I think that Rick Majerus' decision not to coach USC three days after accepting the job sets the standard for coaching tenure. I thought that George
O'Leary's one-week stint as football coach at Notre Dame would be tough to break, but Majerus beat it by more than half. So, what coach out there will
"step up", "take this to the next level", and sign somewhere only to renounce the job in only 48 hours...
Larry Eustachy is back coaching basketball at Southern Mississippi. You probably remember that he was the one who lost his job at Iowa State after
photos of him drinking at a Missouri fraternity party and kissing a co-ed were plastered all over the Internet. In one of the pictures, it appears as
if he is trying to French kiss a young lady's ear. Eustachy admitted having an alcohol problem and sought treatment/therapy. I do not doubt that he
has stopped his drinking; but based on an interview with the LA Times, I'm not sure that he has come to grips fully with his previous behaviors.
Eustachy told the LA Times he is less than thrilled about the basis for his firing at Iowa State. He said, "There are probably two to three hundred
pictures of me kissing people at events. I kissed a guy on the cheek who was dressed as a leprechaun at a Halloween party but nobody published that.
If I'd been kissing ladies on the cheek at an old-age home, I would have been called a hero."
Memo to Larry Eustachy:
1. Welcome back to coaching.
2. You were partying at a rival school frat party after a game with that school and drinking with underage students. That is not heroic.
3. You were snuggling up to someone young enough to be your daughter whilst both of you were in a state of inebriation. If you can't see the
difference between that and kissing ladies at an old-age home, you need to head on back to your therapy provider for some follow-up sessions.
4. You were drinking Natural Light beer. That alone should qualify as a crime against nature...
Here are two interesting items from Elliot Harris in the Chicago Sun-Times:
"Steve Tasker summed up the situation (the Bears/Texans game) nicely when he told his TV audience, 'The only problem with the Bears' defense is they
have to turn the ball over to the offense.' "
"Philly receiver Terrell Owens may miss most, if not all of the postseason. You want desperate housewives? Try Eagles spouses who have already spent
Super Bowl bonuses."
This will be the final rant of the year. I am closing down Curmudgeon Central so that I can spend time with family and friends. Like it or not, I'll
be back after the New Year.
Finally, Reading lost to Wolverhampton 4-1 in an English soccer match recently. Steve Coppell is the manager of the Reading team; after this loss, he
told the Sunday Times in London:
"I'm a man of few words, but most of the ones I used in the dressing room began with 'F' and 'S'."
But don't get me wrong, I love sports...
This will be the final rant of the year. I am closing down Curmudgeon Central so that I can spend time with family and friends. Like it or not, I'll
be back after the New Year.
Copyright The Sports Curmudgeon