 |
|
Topic started on 10-12-2003 @ 12:17 PM by crayon
|
Uh, oh, this could lead to lots of debate everywhere.
 PETROPOLIS, Brazil (Reuters) - As Americans prepare to celebrate the centennial of the Wright brother's first flight, a whole country is
cringing at what it believes to be a historical injustice against one of its most beloved heroes.
Ask anyone in Brazil who invented the airplane and they will say Alberto Santos-Dumont, a 5-foot-4-inch (1.6 meter) bon vivant who was as known for
his aerial prowess as he was for his dandyish dress and high society life in Belle Epoque Paris. 
Who Invented the Airplane? a
Brazilian, of Course
How would you define "flight" of an airplane? I think that is what it all boils down to.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-12-2003 @ 12:27 PM by PARALYZ
|
"Flight" as far as i've heard is supposed to be Controlled Mechanical Flight.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-12-2003 @ 12:27 PM by Gazrok
|
Interesting story...
 He would keep his dirigible tied to a gas lamp post in front of his Paris apartment at the Champs-Elysees and every night he would fly
to Maxim's for dinner. During the day he'd fly to go shopping, he'd fly to visit friends," Hoffman told Reuters 
Seems obvious though, that he was more of a balloonist. The article fails to depict his "plane" only describing it as a kite-like boxy
contraption....(unless I missed it). So the question is, could his device take off, and achieve powered flight? If I recall, the Wright Bros. plane,
has been flown more recently to prove the point, as have replicas of it, showing that it didn't need either a catapult, nor strong winds to achieve
takeoff....
Semantics really, as I doubt we'll see all the history books get changed. History is written by the winners, and if you fail to make the world
notice your invention....well....you've nobody to blame but yourself....
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-12-2003 @ 12:29 PM by Valhall
|
Yeah, this one will probably never be resolved. However, the first instance of ACHIEVING controlled flight is pretty cinched up...
Oh well, we can't get a clear call on Calculus either
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-12-2003 @ 01:35 PM by ultra_phoenix
|
The first person to actually sustain controlled, powered flight was not one of the Wright brothers.
It was Richard Pearse of New Zealand a few months before in a more advanced flying machine of his own design & construction. On 31-3-1902 he flew
about 350 yards, and on 11-5-1903 flew over 1,000 yards, out of ground effect & including several turns.
Link
Netchicken ? Where are you ?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-12-2003 @ 01:47 PM by groingrinder
|
Originally posted by Valhall
Yeah, this one will probably never be resolved. However, the first instance of ACHIEVING controlled flight is pretty cinched up...
Oh well, we can't get a clear call on Calculus either 
So what's the story on CALCULUS ? I thought Sir Isaac Newton invented it.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-12-2003 @ 09:00 PM by KrazyIvan
|
hey man its all about who does it first. controlled manual flight was the wright brothers
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-12-2003 @ 09:02 PM by KrazyIvan
|
Originally posted by Valhall
Yeah, this one will probably never be resolved. However, the first instance of ACHIEVING controlled flight is pretty cinched up...
Oh well, we can't get a clear call on Calculus either 
what do you mean a clear cal on calculus. are you talking who came up with it? i think it was newton that came up wih it.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-12-2003 @ 09:02 PM by Nerdling
|
the wright brothers.
Balloons, blimps and other dirigibles do not count as they do not require power to fly. Flying requires a vehicle that has no floating properties that
is able to take off and fly to an area higher than its take off point through powered means.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-12-2003 @ 09:08 PM by Valhall
|
Newton and Liebnitz came up with it concurrently. Which is a very interesting study in synchronicity, don't you think?
Nerdling,
Don't forget Octave Chanute.
[Edited on 11-12-2003 by Valhall]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-12-2003 @ 09:26 PM by ADVISOR
|
Is duration of control a requirement, of "Controlled Mechanical Flight"?
Just to narrow down the specifics, I would like to offer a quote from a site I read.
"More than 500 years after Leonardo da Vinci first sketched out designs for manned flight, British engineers have succeeded in putting his ideas into
practice...It is part of a widespread revival of interest in da Vinci’s hundreds of mechanical
designs..."
external image
ANU
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-12-2003 @ 09:27 PM by Valhall
|
Advisor,
You are correct, if we really want to get down to "documented concept" Da Vinci would win hands down.
Yes, there was a time requirement in ascertaining whether controlled flight had been achieved.
But, I would like to point out that the questions was "who invented the airplane", not who proved their design would meet the requirements of
controlled flight.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |