The way I see it is that the whole concept of some kind of afterlife is that it exists; Religious people would call it the continuance of the soul,
while more science-minded would call it psychic residue. Either way you look at it, it still means that death of the body does *not* mean total
oblivion of the personality; It's just two different methods of *describing* the situation.
If body-death means total oblivion, then how do you explain the *reliable & accurate* (IE: Couldn't be proven as a hoax) reports of ghosts &
interaction with other "spirits"? So far, the hard sciences say that matter & energy can't be created or destroyed (As far as we've been able to
find out), only changed into different forms; If this is true, what then happens to the "psychic (scientific)/spiritual (religious)" energy that
made up our personalities? If the *destruction* of that energy is impossible, then that means the energy has been *converted* into another form;
Hence, this becomes the psyche/spirit existance. Whether you're religious or not, it's hard to deny that *some form* of afterlife is apparent, you
just call it by different names.
Other examples of having a relilgious or scientific description of what is likely to be the same thing: Prophecy/Precognition; Faith Healing/Psychic
Healing...It just depends on what *term* you wish to use, but both sciences & religion are talking about pretty much the same thing. Parasciences have
gone some ways into studying the phenomena, but like any other science there's still a long way to go before full *understanding* can be achieved;
Conversely, the religious person also has a means to better understand what scriptures are trying to say to them, but still have no real *proof* of
what they have faith in.
By breaking through the labels that make science & religion so different from each other, we can still talk about the same things without wasting a
lot of time (& Simon's bandwidth) by pointless arguing. In other words, why waste time arguing over whether or not religion or science is right or
wrong when they both address *the same basic questions of existance*?
Overall, in general, I wish we'd devote more equal resources to the Parasciences as compared to the Physical Sciences...IMO, we'd learn more with
more of a *balance* between the two.
Originally posted by stewards
I was merely stating a prophetic fact.
What kind of timestream do you live in? Prophecy is something yet to happen (or not happen)...A guess on future events. It can't be *fact* until the
event has occured (or the time passed without occuring). In other words "prohetic" & "fact" are two terms that are mutually exclusive.
Originally posted by stewards
Toltec
You could not educate me about religion even if you tried your best.
Yet, when the Bible mentions the word "sword" in that context, it doesn't actually *mean* missle...In the Bible, the context of using the word
"sword" generally *means* "weapon" or "weapon of war". In other parts of the Bible, the "Hand of God" could mena either blessings bestowed or
it could mean punishment, depending on the context of the passages surrounding that phrase.
In this context "sword" basically means a weapon of war...But there *are* more weapons of mass destruction other than "missle". Biological or
Chemical weapons can also cause massive death-tolls in war. The person who actually experienced that vision probably only saw some kind of weapon in
that vision, but he couldn't also *paint an actual picture* of what he saw...Using only the written word, he still had to use the terminology of his
language to describe what he saw; At that period in time, "sword" was widely known as the most effective weapon of war that he knew other people
would understand.
By trying to pin down a prophecy to such an exact specific seems to indicate that you let someone else give you their interpretation of scripture
rather than letting the Holy Spirit guide you to your own interpretation. Unlike many doomsaying fundies, I don't let other people make up my mind
for me as far as what I see in the scriptures themselves.
Other examples of having a relilgious or scientific description of what is likely to be the same thing: Prophecy/Precognition; Faith Healing/Psychic
Healing...It just depends on what *term* you wish to use, but both sciences & religion are talking about pretty much the same thing. Parasciences have
gone some ways into studying the phenomena, but like any other science there's still a long way to go before full *understanding* can be achieved;
Conversely, the religious person also has a means to better understand what scriptures are trying to say to them, but still have no real *proof* of
what they have faith in.
By breaking through the labels that make science & religion so different from each other, we can still talk about the same things without wasting a
lot of time (& Simon's bandwidth) by pointless arguing. In other words, why waste time arguing over whether or not religion or science is right or
wrong when they both address *the same basic questions of existance*?
Overall, in general, I wish we'd devote more equal resources to the Parasciences as compared to the Physical Sciences...IMO, we'd learn more with
more of a *balance* between the two.
Originally posted by stewards
I was merely stating a prophetic fact.
What kind of timestream do you live in? Prophecy is something yet to happen (or not happen)...A guess on future events. It can't be *fact* until the
event has occured (or the time passed without occuring). In other words "prohetic" & "fact" are two terms that are mutually exclusive because once
an event happens, it's no longer Prophetic...It's Historical.
Originally posted by stewards
Toltec
You could not educate me about religion even if you tried your best.
Yet, when the Bible mentions the word "sword" in that context, it doesn't actually *mean* missle...In the Bible, the context of using the word
"sword" generally *means* "weapon" or "weapon of war". In other parts of the Bible, the "Hand of God" could mena either blessings bestowed or
it could mean punishment, depending on the context of the passages surrounding that phrase.
In this context "sword" basically means a weapon of war...But there *are* more weapons of mass destruction other than "missle". Biological or
Chemical weapons can also cause massive death-tolls in war. The person who actually experienced that vision probably only saw some kind of weapon in
that vision, but he couldn't also *paint an actual picture* of what he saw...Using only the written word, he still had to use the terminology of his
language to describe what he saw; At that period in time, "sword" was widely known as the most effective weapon of war that he knew other people
would understand.
By trying to pin down a prophecy to such an exact specific seems to indicate that you let someone else give you their interpretation of scripture
rather than letting the Holy Spirit guide you to your own interpretation. Unlike many doomsaying fundies, I don't let other people make up my mind
for me as far as what I see in the scriptures themselves.
As far as the "body-weight change at death" experiment goes, it would take quite a lot of arranging to produce any concrete info. For one, the
experimenter would have to gain the permission of a fairly large number of death-bed patients to set them up on specially-constructed beds & continue
to monitor them with other instruments as they slip into death. The *patients' permission* would be the key thing to aquire as to avoid potentially
upsetting that patient's relatives. The key obstacle would be the patient's willingness to pass into death without having too many relatives present
at the time of death & to be certain that those relatives *fully understand* that the patients themselves *want* to be so closely monitored at that
stressful time.
If someone can actually pull off an experiment of this nature, I for one would be keenly interested in knowing the results...