It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Submerged city may be older than Mesopotamia

page: 1

log in


posted on Dec, 8 2003 @ 12:42 PM
They think it could pre date sumeria by as many as 2000 years. That would make it the true cradle of civilization. Who knows, maybe it's Atlantis or Mu.

posted on Dec, 8 2003 @ 12:52 PM
Interesting info, but sounds like he's guessing on age...

It led Hancock to surmise that the city could have been submerged by a tidal wave as high as 400 ft somewhere between 17,000 and 7,000 years ago.

That's a pretty big gap... The proof will be in the pudding I suppose..but it really doesn't tie in to being either Atlantis or Mu, but merely similar..(as far as sunken ruins)....

posted on Dec, 8 2003 @ 12:53 PM
Still 7000 to 17000 years is still long before the accepted notion of the beginning of civilisation.

posted on Dec, 8 2003 @ 12:59 PM
No pictures...

From now on, pretend I'm stupid.

I need pictures.

posted on Dec, 17 2003 @ 12:27 AM
I think the futher our technology developes, the more cities we will find.

Some might hold one or two surprises for us...

posted on Dec, 17 2003 @ 12:59 AM

My contempt for 'modern science' and particularily archeologists grows daily...

new topics

top topics

log in