It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Stratrf_Rus
Really?
Research why Donald Rumsfeld was there that day - he was there to tell Saddam for his actions all civilian aid is cut off.
OHHH BURN...
Get out of here please.
At the time of the visit , Iraq had already been removed from the State Department's list of terrorist countries in 1982; and in the previous month, November, President Reagan had approved National Security Decision Directive 114, on expansion of U.S.-Iraq relations generally. But it was Donald Rumsfeld's trip to Baghdad which opened of the floodgates during 1985-90 for lucrative U.S. weapons exports--some $1.5 billion worth-- including chemical/biological and nuclear weapons equipment and technology, along with critical components for missile delivery systems for all of the above.
Originally posted by Muaddib
The problem is that back then he wasn't planning on terrorist attacks against the U.S.
Marg, making comments like that only shows your contempt towards the administration.
I find it ironic that now we have arm chair generals making claims that "it could have been done better".....
Originally posted by jaguarmike
Just because someone is in a position of power that does not make them absolutely right in every action and decision they make in their career. Our country started by not putting up with tyranical rule by the English and we created the greatest country in the world
Originally posted by buddhaLight
For all who still support the actions of bush's clan.
I recommend to watch "the road to guantanamo bay" as long as it's free to watch on google video
"Saddam was convicted last month for ordering the killing of 148 Shias in Dujail town in 1982 in revenge for an assassination attempt against him. He was sentenced to death by hanging"
For how many deaths would Bush be accounted for:
"A team of American and Iraqi epidemiologists estimates that 655,000 more people have died in Iraq since coalition forces arrived in March 2003 than would have died if the invasion had not occurred."
www.washingtonpost.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow">source: The Washington Post
Then, what is the death toll for the war his daddy started:
"UNICEF has documented that the combined effects of the Gulf War and over a decade of economic sanctions have resulted in the deaths of 500,000 children due to malnutrition, diarrhea, and other preventable diseases.
Landmines, unexploded ordnance, and antipersonnel bombs have added thousands of victims to the numbers of physically handicapped children in Iraq, especially amputees."
source: International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War
So ruffly counted, the Bush family/Rumsfeld/Cheney and all others of the clan complotting against the world can be accounted for the death of ONE MILLION DEATHS!!!
[edit on 4-1-2007 by buddhaLight]
Originally posted by jaguarmike
Ok- no I don't think it is a real word could be wrong.
It is covert- it's gross. Look at all the venues and fecets of society they have infiltrated... education, religion, finances, food, drugs, government, science... the list goes on for a while.
I think you all should go to impeachbush.com and sign up.
[edit on 4-1-2007 by jaguarmike]
Originally posted by GT100FV
That 655,000 is completely out of line with every other estimate out there, by a factor of 10 or more.
8 years of the sanctions were during Bill Clinton's administration, yet I haven't heard his name mentioned once in any of these threads. He supported the sanctions, the bombing(Desert Fox '98), believed Saddam was a threat and had WMD, etc... If you want credibility as more than a Bush basher, you need to be even handed with your criticism.
I suppose Saddam living high on the hog whilst keeping necessities from his people was Bush and Cheney's fault too?
Originally posted by buddhaLight
Oh common !!! Open your eyes man...
Go read some history or something... You don't know what your talking about...
And what WMD's are you talking about.. They still haven't found any..
Originally posted by df1
Frankly I'm surprised that partisan supporters of the administration have the hubris to even bring up the subject of Iraq's WMDs. Any WMDs that Saddam ever had were provided by Bush I, Rumsfeld & Cheney and any evidence that Saddam still had WMDs prior to the current invasion of Iraq was fabricated to justify executing plans made by PNAC even before Bush II was elected.
.
Originally posted by GT100FV
Originally posted by df1
Frankly I'm surprised that partisan supporters of the administration have the hubris to even bring up the subject of Iraq's WMDs. Any WMDs that Saddam ever had were provided by Bush I, Rumsfeld & Cheney and any evidence that Saddam still had WMDs prior to the current invasion of Iraq was fabricated to justify executing plans made by PNAC even before Bush II was elected.
.
Can you show me major news sources that provide evidence that George Bush Sr. sold Iraq WMD?
Originally posted by buddhaLight
Hahahahaha GT100FV
What about santa claus? You still believe in that
en.wikipedia.org...