It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by halfmask
How do you plan to categorize them? Shape/appearance, behavior, corporal/non-corporal
Originally posted by squiz
This thread is intended to find similarties in ufo features captured in photographs or on film, hopefully to give more weight to the evidence we already have. It is easy to dismiss one photograph as being fake but when we start seeing similar objects captured by different people and in different parts of the world, well thats a little harder to dismiss. I,ve only just begun to do this and very quickly can find several types that keep appearing.
Originally posted by eaglewingz
No worries, squiz, that's a good example of the hazards of examining UFOs on the Net
It seems to me that the trouble with finding good photos lies in the fact that is hard to find a good modern case with multiple witnesses and convincing physical evidence.
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
getting back to UFOogy - " adamski type " is used as a descriptive / quantifier in several alleged sightings - and that is IMHO a blatant attempt to appeal to numbers . as i have noted , adamskis images have been availiable for years - so its too easy for a lazy faker to copy them , in the hope that others will reach the conclusion you did .