It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Palasheea
I really do think that this year is going to be a big one in terms of disclosure but this topic deals specifically with those die-hard skeptics out there who would probably not even believe in UFO's even if they landed on the White House Lawn!
Originally posted by polomontana
Thanks Dallas and Palasheea,
I also think that Iron Man points out a flaw in the skeptic arguement. What is 100% factual guaranteed evidence? Human beings have always weighed the evidence using reason. Skeptics use an unreasonable standard to begin with as a way of getting to the truth.
So using this standard the skeptic has set up a red herring and he could always try to discredit Ufology by debunking a picture here and a video there.
You have more evidence for Ufology than you have for many court cases or for black holes.
Again, the skeptics starts off buy saying we have to have proof without a shadow of a doubt and we do have proof without any reasonable doubt.
They don't want to seek the truth, they just want to muddy the waters because like Jack Nicholson said they can't handle the truth. That's understandable because it's something that runs up against a persons belief system.
In the end, I think we need to accept this truth because we are advancing in technology and we need to also advance mentally and spiritually. We need to look at these things from the standpoint that yes they exist, now what can we learn from this and how can it help us advance.
The weather balloon and flashing light excuse is getting old and it's an affront to reason and intelligence.
Skeptics want a UFO to land in their front yard and invite them to a barbecue before they use reason to weigh the evidence.
Originally posted by HaveSeen4Myself
Very good summarization, polomontana. Skeptics' and debunkers' endless effort to marginalize the subject of ufology, while being masqueraded as a service to society, continues to represent a disservice to humanity.
Dwight Eisenhower certainly believed in UFOs, since he took so many drastic measures to deal with them.
The only reason skeptics get away with this deception is because they work in concert with the greedy few who benefit from non-disclosure.
The same ones in control of the media/political/military/banking monopoly we know as government.
Originally posted by Palasheea
Then there are those people who for all we know, may actually believe that the evidence presented in Ufology in support for the existence of UFO's and extraterrestrials is there but we would be the last one's to know that because they PREFER to publicly present themselves as skeptics of such phenomena where they are even wearing that skepticism as a BADGE OF HONOR just to prove to everybody else that they are BETTER and more SUPERIOR to us low-life's who are more honest and are not afraid of ridicule because we know that such phenomena exist also but we are not afraid to say so because saying anything otherwise would be out and out lying.
For those who wear their skepticism as a BADGE OF HONOR, they are living with the illusion that one is considered more politically correct and is more in synch with the existing status quo (but only as they perceive it) by presenting themselves as UFO skeptics even though statitics are showing in ever increasing numbers each year that goes by that more and more Americans believe that UFO's are out there!
But rest assured, once the belief in UFO's among American's topples over that proverbial 'tipping point', these same people who are now proudly calling themselves skeptics will then miraculously morph themselves into believers as by then it would be politically incorrect to appear anything otherwise.
For such people like this, it's all about which way the wind blows.... not about things like honesty, integrity and the TRUTH!
a skeptic would look at the man encouraging him to jump off the bridge and question the man's motives, question the actual depth of the water, heck, the skeptic would even question the bungee itself.
Originally posted by HaveSeen4Myself
a skeptic would look at the man encouraging him to jump off the bridge and question the man's motives, question the actual depth of the water, heck, the skeptic would even question the bungee itself.
A skeptic would say that no such man exists and that the bridge was a mere reflection on the water, and the video-taped evidence of the bungee cord was photoshopped.