It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
I agree that we should keep it impersonal, but does that mean we also avoid chastizing her for accusing innocent members of society of being terrorists, and giving their names to the feds?
Originally posted by chissler
I've just sat here and read the entire thread, and I am a little frustrated.
We all jump to the conclusion that this is another hoax and berate this member with everything we can throw. As Majic likes to say, "Every Member Deserves Respect!". Honestly, I am tired of seeing members coming in and attacking the member and not the content. Say something productive and debunk the message that is being discussed. Attacking the member itself is something we are seeing way too much here.
What if this member actually believes what they are saying? What if this is not a hoax, and they are honestly making a serious effort here? Would we truly want to insult any American who is trying to bring Osama Bin Laden to justice? Honestly though, this is a noble cause.
I'm not saying I believe what they are saying. I find it hard to believe that myspace was the tool to bring down Bin Laden. However, I do respect the effort this member is putting forward. He/She have been called every name in the book, laughed at, ridiculed, etc., yet still continues to post and defend the cause. All the while carrying herself with decorum.
You don't have to agree with the message here, but you have no right to dish out what this member has been taking.
I don't believe this to be true, but I respect the fact that this member may actually believe what she is saying. If her efforts and belief are genuine, you should be ashamed for the way you have treated her.
In the case that this member is knowingly posting false information, we should debunk the content and show her the door. It is against the T&C to do so, and the staff would take care of it. However, ridiculing the member herself, is wrong.
Originally posted by TheBandit795
You will notice that when a player is called for a foul it’s because he went after the opponent instead of the ball.
Let's focus on the ball.
Originally posted by niteboy82
Leslie, would you be willing to forward your emails to a moderator of this site, in order to look through them and verify? This would be a member trusted in part with the upkeep of this site, so therefore, someone who could be trusted a bit more than say your average member.
Byrd was instrumental in looking at the emails of the "boeing laptop bought at the airport" hoax, and showing that it was indeed a joke. Maybe she would be willing to look through your emails and let the rest of us know.
Kind of like a second opinion, ya know?
Basically Leslie, if we are going to believe this, then we are going to need some verification from somewhere. Secondly, have you ever entertained the notion that if you indeed spoke to an FBI agent, that maybe he/she was pulling your chain, and just acting like this was a big deal, though he knew it wasn't?
Thanks
*Edit to add: I sent a u2u to Byrd, and she would be willing to look over the emails, but you have to include the headers.
The ball is now in your court.
[edit on 1/2/07 by niteboy82]
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Chis,
You're right, there have been a lot of comments about the mental stability of Leslie, and they may be unfounded. However, my concern is that the individual is telling the truth as far as she knows. And, because it's so unlikely that Osama, or other terrorists are on Myspace, she is likely reporting perfectly innocent people to the FBI for no other reason than their profile name is "The Director" or has "Hajji" in their name.
This leads me to believe that she is likely a danger to society. It's just shy of screeming "Jew" on the streets of Nazi Germany.
Originally posted by chissler
Let's look at it like this.
Would it be better to try, and be wrong? Or be right, and not even try?
The end in this situation is Bin Laden being brought to justice. It is quite apparent that the end would justify any means, when discussing this individual.
Originally posted by kickoutthejams
The thing is people on ATS are very experienced at debunking 'claims' made by other people such as the one Leslie is making.
Rather than direct ire at us because we don't believe you and your claims you should take it as a 'reality check'. I mean we're the people more likely to believe than others seeing as this IS a conspiracy site. However, your story doesn't add up, is devoid of proof that can be checked out (which is all too convenient in these cases)
In fact a reality check is just what you need with all this. If you are not satisfied with the result of your postings here then it really would be important for you to present your findings to a neutral third party, who will tell you what they think. Perhaps a lawyer, or a free drop in advice centre or other fairly upstanding member of your community.
The fact of the matter is that Intel agencies just don't operate the way you have suggested they do. Plus you would never be allowed to go 'trumpeting' yourself like this if indeed you had achieved what you claim.
I don't think anyone wishes you any bad feeling in all this, just that it is very important to get an objective viewpoint. We've given ours but you're well advised to get a second opinion.
Originally posted by VoXiSo
that woman needs a prescription of zoloft and xanax
Originally posted by intrepid
One last time folks, let's keep this from being personal.