posted on Dec, 31 2006 @ 07:48 PM
Well,since I have Sun on ignore,I cannot read his response, nor do I wish to. However,I concur with Benevolent, any attempt to get a rational
explanation from Sun is a lost cause. He makes some pretty outstanding claims that are just not historically supported. He claims that the Christians
had nothing to do with the crusades nor with the inquisition... Au contraire, history supplies ample proof that Christians not only paricipated in
these events, they were the promulgators of these events in history. Christianity and its sister religion,Islam, certainly were the ones involved in
the crusades. Yet, according to Sun
, all of this is false.
Yet, he expects everyone to believe that all other religions, other than Christianity, rose from Babylon...This is a "fact" that is not historically
corroborated, yet, Sun says we must believe this... Hmmm... No agenda there, eh?
It seems to me, that anything that finds fault with Christianity,such as the crusades and the inquisition,Sun automatically labels incorrect. However,
he is real quick to try and find "faults" with other's beliefs and label those "facts" as being "truthful." Has anyone ever seen him post
anything that even remotely resembled historical accuracy? I haven't.