It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bigdanprice
I think we began to see, particularly with the world cup, how past views of Germans being the enemy and the like are slowly eroding. This is definitley to our advantage.
Originally posted by bigdanprice
Incidently Britain has debts from the pre napoleonic war era that it is still repaying, as it is cheaper to do so than to buy back the bonds themselves... I wonder who we are paying those to...?
Originally posted by stumason
Incidentally again, Income Tax was only introduced as a result of the Napoleonic Wars to raise money to beat the Frogs and was meant to be temporary....
Temporary my arse...
Originally posted by stumason
I am borderline higher rate, so a bit of extra overtime here and there and WHAM, 40% "thankyou very much Mr Taxpayer...."
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
......and after all it is only 40% on earnings above that particular threshold (£33 300).
Allowances
Everyone gets a certain allowance (see the tax tables link below) where any income you receive under your personal allowance is tax free. And of course children don't pay income tax. They can choose to have savings interest paid with no tax deducted by filling in form IR85, which is available from their bank or building society.
Tax bands
The first tax band is 10%. The next bands are basic (22%) and top-rate (40%). But you only pay higher rate tax of 40% on the amount you earn over the limit.
A report in this week's Economist newspaper offers an intruiging update. It states that in the four years to 30 June last year, Mr Murdoch's News Corporation and its subsidiaries paid only A$325m (£128m) in corporate taxes worldwide. That translates as 6% of the A$5.4bn consolidated pre-tax profits for the same period.
By comparison another multi-national media empire, Disney, paid 31%.
The corporate tax rates for the three main countries in which News Corp operates - Australia, the United States and the UK - are 36%, 35% and 30% respectively.
Further research reveals that Mr Murdoch's main British holding company, Newscorp Investments, has paid no net corporation tax within these shores over the past 11 years. This is despite accumulated pre-tax profits of nearly £1.4bn. Payments were made in some years, but in others rebates were claimed.
The Newscorp Investments stable includes newspapers such as The Times and The Sun as well as a 40% share in the satellite broadcaster BSkyB. Had it paid the full 30% rate on its 1998 profit of £309m, it would have netted the Exchequer £92m. (Enough to buy thousands of school textbooks, something that the Murdoch press is currently encouraging parents to do by way of collecting newspaper tokens.)
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
Probably like everybody's' 'system' it certainly can get very complicated (when things like savings, shares, property or inheritance enter the picture).
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
The British system does seem to have one feature that stands out; if you tax lawyers are smart enough and your accountant good enough you can avoid a lot of your liability.
Originally posted by st3ve_o
or charge for the US having numerous cold war era bases set up on British soil (that are still going to date).
St3ve_o,
The US based are part of the lease/lend agreement. We have just paid the financial element of the agreement off.
All the US bases are listed as UK bases and have typically an RAF commander (As most of the UK bases were for the US Air Force) and a US commander. Of course we can guess who ran things.
I worked at a RAF base that was in fact a US Air Force base. To annoy the Americans, the Brits would only stand up when the RAF commander came in.
Originally posted by st3ve_o
all in all, appreciate the help but maybe Britain should charge the United States for our support in Iraq/Alfghanistan?
Originally posted by st3ve_o
or charge for the US having numerous cold war era bases set up on British soil (that are still going to date).
Text Believe me st3ve_o you and Europe as a whole have very little to complain about.
Originally posted by dj howls
Yes your quite right
Originally posted by dj howls
Estonla, Latvia and Lithuania had nothing to complain about
Originally posted by dj howls
Or perhaps the German citizens of Dresden??? What about neutral Finland who were attacked by the Allies(Russia) and left for dead by the USA, they should shut up aswell
Originally posted by dj howls
and lets not get started on Poland, disrespectful upstarts
Originally posted by dj howls
Maybe it was Russia that in fact defeated the Nazis and not the USA???
Originally posted by danwild6
I wonder what the British and the French were up to from Sept. 1939 to May 1940.
Originally posted by st3ve_o
all in all, appreciate the help but maybe Britain should charge the United States for our support in Iraq/Alfghanistan?
or charge for the US having numerous cold war era bases set up on British soil (that are still going to date).
Originally posted by infinite
errr.... Trying to prevent a another War in Europe?
Originally posted by danwild6
I thought the war had already begun at that point I'm pretty sure it effectively began on Sept. 1 1939 when Germany invaded Poland.