It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Freeyourmind775
I've gone overseas and into combat in Iraq and will be returning agian soon.
Finally, before I start, i'm not going to waste my time re-contracting some of the points becuase after having read your argument, I don't think you have the necessary knowledge/experience or spelling ability to continue this discussion.
Also, there is no gurantee that whatever bio-weapon they might use is effective. Small pox worked because it was a disease that affected humans being used on humans. What if they bio-weapon they use instead of making us weak and defensless, makes us stronger?
And asteroids are the most effective way. If they are planning on invading the earth, they could easily send ships YEARS in advance to drop an asteroid and wait for the mothership to arrive, it arrives, the governments and destroied, we have no way to see into space and all of a sudden the remaining camps are taken over with little to no resistance. But like I said (Since you obviously didn't read my entire post), this would only work if they wanted to SCAVENGE MINERALS AND LEAVE.
Also, I don't know why you think that you would be able to defend your country or planet better then the people who are trained to. And I doubt anyone would go "Rambo" on you. The military is not what you see in the movies. And nukes can be detonated from the ground, loaded onto planes and detonated in specific areas, or over a dozen other ways we could detonate them. Also, I doubt that the military will be wiped out that quickly and effectively, Even with millions or billions of invaders, the military would last alot longer then a few minutes. And if they were so powerful that we didn't, the entire planet would probably surrender. It's easy for people to "Monday Morning Coach", or talk about what they think they will do, But personnel experience shows me thats more often not true then it is true, you may think you would rather go down fighting, but what happens when the aliens come here, obliterate say, 30% of the worlds population without even trying, and then say "Surrender of the rest die, doesn't really matter to us". Most people would probably be too afraid to resist.
Also, your wrong, SINCGARS (Sorry, I had spelled it wrong previously, and you can learn about it here: en.wikipedia.org... ) Radios do not use words. It uses frequency hops and Encryption to enable real-time voice transmissions without code-words. Also, i think your confusing HAM Radios with MORSE Code. Not all ham radios are clicking. And if it is MORSE code, all they would need to do was to goto a destoied library, and grab any book which describes how MORSE code works.
Your telling me to use logic, but you don't seem to use it or be capable of it's use yourself, as you contradict yourself constantly. If they have the capability to withstand bullets and explosives, what makes you think something as retardedly primative as a sword or hammer are going to be effective? What if they bones are 10 times stronger then ours? All you've done is piss the alien off at a CLOSE range which means that your most likely going to die alot more horribly. I'm done talking about bludgeoning, because it's retarded.
This is the one which made me decide to stop this discussion with you.
You realize, a tanks HE round is MUCH more powerful then a TOW?
Not to mention, a tow is EXTREMELY difficult to setup and move if not on a mobile platform like a HMMWV, and it's also very difficult to reload on the spot. Hitting an enemy that can resist tank rounds with 10 tows, isn't going to do much better.
Do you people really think you're going to fight aliens and win?