I remember, sitting in the car with my boss, driving to the office having a discussion about all the news regarding IRAQ..
I remember telling my boss if they don’t accept the United States demands to give up all weapons, and allow total inspection.. It was going to be an
absolute massacre on both sides.
Forgive me, but I was excited. Trying to understand the sheer experience of such a military manoeuvre unlike anything since ww2.
My boss turned to me and said
“He has no weapons, he’s been sanctioned for a decade. His soldiers don’t want to fight, they’ll surrender like the first gulf war.”
I sat there staring out the window, thinking…
‘That’s impossible. Surely a nation
WOULDN’T,
COULDN’T lie to the entire world, to such a gigantic extent, and expect to get
away with it.’
To me, it was sheer stupidity to ASSUME Iraq didn’t have weapons. The world leader of life, liberty and justice made the absolute declaration that
they had undeniable evidence of such weapons, to assume they were lying to the world, for ulterior motives was just unheard of, especially coming from
this particular country.
People look at this war like it is just another chapter, in the history of United States military adventures.
But it is so much more than that.
The world had a voice, the UN had some cause in the 1940’s post war world.
The world was a relatively peaceful place, where prosperity, life, love and happiness was at the forefront of everyone’s mind.
How have we gone from such an idealic situation, into such an unknown for today’s civilisation?
People fail to see the consequences of allowing this beast out into the world.
Needing to be hit, before retaliation meant no country hit you.
Now we live in a world, where one man can decide
if someone is enough of a
potential threat, needing immediate, and harsh military
action.
But this rule is only allowed, for 1 country?
How is this a safe world?
Should anyone perceive the military build-up of the USA on there borders ‘a potential threat’ Do they have the right to pre-emptive military
action?
No, because the USA would class them as aggressors.
This war has changed the equilibrium of the worlds nations tremendously. It goes so much further than Iraq.
After WW2, there was sense of acceptance to allow the USA to be the world superpower. It wasn’t written in paper, or declared. The world felt safe
having the US as a super power because they were willing to annihilate anyone that trampled over the idea of freedom of choice, and love of life. No
matter what the losses.
NOW?
The USA has actively taken a aggressive stance towards a nation who sought nothing but peace. A nation that posed no threat, and was aggressive
towards no one.
This is a new world because now, the world doesn’t trust the United States to be the all fair leader of the human race.
This is something I find some Americans FAIL to see.
How do you see, the world has changed now that we have gone against the interest of world peace, and illegally invaded a nation that posed no
threat?
Im interested to see if people still think we live in a world, where they trust the USA?
[edit on 27-12-2006 by Agit8dChop]
[edit on 27-12-2006 by Agit8dChop]