It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
He projected that in five years, Iranian oil exports may be less than half their present level, and could drop to zero by 2015.
"It therefore seems possible that Iran's claim to need nuclear power might be genuine, an indicator of distress from anticipated export revenue shortfalls," he wrote. "If so, the Iranian regime may be more vulnerable than is presently understood."
Originally posted by princeofpeace
Because lower prices at the pumps is what gets leaders elected and keeps the current ones in power. =)
We invaded Iraq and it hasnt given us any more oil at all and gas prices are still high. I still love hearing all the freaking idiots who said we went to Iraq because of oil LOL.
Originally posted by xmotex
The world is full of tinpot dictators, funny how we only go to war when there are vital resources involved.
Originally posted by xpert11
Oh come on such claims stretch creditability beyond believability. No one has really been able to put an accurate gauge on when any oil reserves will run low . Remember people said that we would face peak oil by the year 2000 ?
Originally posted by xpert11
If the government of Iran was genuinely interested in power generation there are other methods they could be exploring that wouldn't attract political attention and couldn't be used as weapons.
Solar power would be a good option and the likes of wind power also springs to mind.
Originally posted by xpert11
Solar power can be used to heat hot water and can be used to power the likes of cars. Solar Power could be used to reduce the dependency on oil generated electricity. Wind Power could be used to power small settlements. Both wind and Solar Power are viable options even if they don't fit the bill in the traditional sense of generating electricity.
Originally posted by xpert11
I havnt seen any proof that Iran dosnt want Nuclear weapons . The government of Iran is hardly going to come forward and admit that they are developing Nuclear Weapons.
Originally posted by bodrul
they are viable for small things like that
not large cities and so forth hence why nuclear power is more reliable as it produces more power from less meterial.
them just having to repeat that they arent intrested in nukes and with the US and so forth not being able to back their claim up.
On 6 August, 2005, Iran rejected a 34 page European Union proposal intended to help Iran build "a safe, economically viable and proliferation-proof civil nuclear power generation and research programme.” The Europeans, with US agreement, intended to entice Iran into a binding commitment not to build atomic arms by offering to provide fuel and other long-term support that would facilitate electricity generation with nuclear energy. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi rejected the proposal saying, "We had already announced that any plan has to recognize Iran’s right to enrich uranium"
On February 16, 2006 French Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy said "No civilian nuclear programme can explain the Iranian nuclear programme. It is a clandestine military nuclear programme.
Dont you find it strange that Iran hasn't been able to prove that they have peaceful intentions
Originally posted by xpert11
While you are correct you are overlooking what happens when you add up all the little things the whole suddenly becomes quite different. If replaced petrol powered care with cars that are powered by alternative your reliance and on oil would take a big drop.
Originally posted by xpert11
Dont you find it strange that Iran hasn't been able to prove that they have peaceful intentions ?
What exactly is the Iranian military going to put in there intercontinental ballistic missiles ?
Given the stance taken by Iran leaders I think it is a very reasonable assumption that Iran is developing Nuclear weapons. The government of Iran is using the economic argument as a well disguised cover for its Nuclear weapons program.
Originally posted by xpert11
People that stand on both sides of the issues cant 100% prove there beliefs. Of course it is possible that Iran is developing Nuclear power and weapons.
Originally posted by xpert11
Hmm if the Iranian government had peaceful intension's they would have been more willing to take this kind of deal.
Originally posted by xpert11
Link
Iran's chief nuclear envoy Ali Larijani said on Friday that Iran is committed to the peaceful use of nuclear technology but warned the situation could change if his country is threatened.
The Stennis had been scheduled to deploy to the Pacific region. But the Pentagon agreed instead to send the carrier group to the Gulf after a request from U.S. Central Command, the military command responsible for Middle East operations.