More Defence

www.spacedaily.com...


This, Laser tech, and some secret stuff sure keeps missles out

Well, all I have to say is:

USA! USA! USA!

news.bbc.co.uk...

China's response

Russian disarmament experts say that China would inevitably respond by building more missiles, in order to improve the chance of penetrating US defences.



China could build more mobile missiles

It has also been suggested that other countries, such as India and Pakistan, could follow China's lead.

not good

By relying on smaller and slower rockets to intercept incoming missiles, Mr Putin's proposed system would leave the ABM treaty intact.

The underlying principle of this treaty is that both the US and Russia (originally the USSR) should remain vulnerable to each other's nuclear arsenal.



Mr Putin, proposing a joint missile defence system, in an NBC interview

If either state were to neutralise the threat from the other - by building a national ABM system - it would no longer have to worry about retaliation, and would be more likely to launch a first strike.

Cool. So far we have 3 Missle Defences Systems. And for Russia and China? How many could they lauch at one day? We could just nuke them back with them not having a Missle defence.

Originally posted by Laxpla
Cool. So far we have 3 Missle Defences Systems. And for Russia and China? How many could they lauch at one day? We could just nuke them back with them not having a Missle defence.

Russian officials have said that one of their first responses to any US abrogation of the ABM treaty would be to put multiple warheads and decoys on ballistic missiles.

there went the usefulness of your SDI, besides russia got 2000 s-300 systems

really? The Laser couldnt be used Just once, It can be used multiple times. And with the defence coming out in 2007 posted above, thats more them nuff. Night, time to ride my golf cart, iam bored.