It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by etshrtslr
And seeing how modern science does not even know from where consciousness originates in humans I cant see robots having any form of consciousness until science knows what causes consciousness.
That is the interersting twist...is to see how the robots respond...
Chinese Room argument is a thought experiment designed by John Searl
Suppose that, many years from now, we have constructed a computer that behaves as if it understands Chinese. In other words, the computer takes Chinese characters as input and, following a set of rules (as all computers can be described as doing), correlates them with other Chinese characters, which it presents as output. Suppose that this computer performs this task so convincingly that it easily passes the Turing test. In other words, it convinces a human Chinese speaker that the program is itself a human Chinese speaker. All the questions the human asks are responded to appropriately, such that the Chinese speaker is convinced that he or she is talking to another Chinese-speaking human. The conclusion proponents of strong AI would like to draw is that the computer understands Chinese, just as the person does.
Now, Searle asks us to suppose that he is sitting inside the computer. In other words, he is in a small room in which he receives Chinese characters, consults a rule book, and returns the Chinese characters that the rules dictate. Searle notes that he doesn't, of course, understand a word of Chinese. Furthermore, he argues that his lack of understanding goes to show that computers don't understand Chinese either, because they are in the same situation as he is. They are mindless manipulators of symbols, just as he is — and they don't understand what they're 'saying', just as he doesn't.
Originally posted by thelibra
There's actually already a very lively discussion going on in this thread about the same exact article and subject if you wanted to consolidate the threads. If not, that's cool too, but figured I'd make the offer.
Originally posted by etshrtslr
Until a robot has true consciousness then any response would just be the result of programing.
Well, interestingly enough...that is what I think about humans. We may just be seeing the results of our programming.