Originally posted by Saphronia
BT: Why do we like Dean? He's going to raise taxes on everybody to balance the budget. (Matter of fact they all are vowing to raise taxes which
means not only am I paying a higher sales tax and higher property taxes, I won't even get the federal tax cut that caused my local taxes to sky
rocket in the first place) Never mind that he stutters whenever he tries to make a witty come back which leads me to believe its coached comedy. I
don't like him and I don't like taxes. Then what is his policy on the war on terror? He can't stop the war in Iraq and even if he could--he
shouldn't because we don't have Saddam and the country isn't stable enough for us to leave, and Dean knows this. Only reason to put a dem in the
white house is so that the courts don't turn this into a christian fundie nation. But, the dems have been able to block most of the judges.
On Bush: He's not going into Syria and Iran. They have NK under control. Yes, he went into Iraq. Yes, its a mess. But, we are fighting terror
here, and I see what he's trying to do strategically. Democracy is the only thing that will end the strangle hold these fundies have on the Muslim
population over there. They want democracy, they just don't know it yet . His policy sucks, but if in the end Iraq is free and Jordan follows
and Palestine follows and Syria follows. We can save a lot of lives...Arabs and Americans. Bush lives on a street called hope. He hopes he's doing
the right thing. I don't really like him much, but I have to like his idealism--that he actually thinks he can change the world for the better.
Some in his administration have a different agenda I don't think he does. I think he wants democracy in the arab world. And, Palestine is a part
of that. In his second term he'll make it happen for the good of us all.
I have to be honest. I'm leaning toward Bush in 04. Just leaning. It's still early.
Well it won�t be the �Miseducation of Lauren Hill�, but it
will be the education of Saphronia!
On Dean�s economic policies: Dean is not a Liberal. Dean is not a true Democrat. Dean
is a Libertarian in Democrats clothing. The definition
of a Libertarian is to be socially Liberal and fiscally Conservative.
We cannot have a strong economy and grow jobs when we are deficit spending like � a Drunken sailor� in the Bush model, where deficits are going to be
steady in our lifetime.
Dean�who was the Lt. governor when Republican Gov. Richard Snelling died of a heart attack in 1991�stayed the course charted by Snelling during his
subsequent five-term tenure � which was to balance the budget. When he became Gov., he added that �we will balance the budget... to meet long-term
fiscal commitments to protect Medicare and Social Security and relieve future generations of the stifling burden of debt." As Dean has said many
times on the campaign trail, 'You can't fund social justice in a deficit.'�
So you had the marriage of Republican tax cut fever, with Democrat social justice.
How did he do it?
At the time, Vermont's tax was a fixed 25 percent of the federal rate. Snelling proposed three rates�pegged on income�and then revoking those
increases when the state retired its deficit. Dean not only followed through on that plan, but when returning to one fixed rate, Dean lowered the
state income tax by 1 percent. Read that again: he
cut taxes. from the book
Howard Dean: A Citizen's Guide to the Man Who Would Be
President (Steerforth Press, 2003): In the first term when Dean could put his own mark on the state budget, 1993 to 1994, Davis said Dean said
no�across-the-boards�to state agency heads for funding increases. This was the last thing many Democrats in Vermont wanted or expected.
"Dean's approach was to accept the Snelling philosophy of tying state spending to the growth rate of the economy," Davis wrote. "But Dean, in
practice, was far tougher on spending than Snelling ever was. Tom Pelham, who was Dean's budget chief for most of his tenure, says he and Dean
calculated that the Snelling budget track was pitched too high by $100 million. So they determined to cut spending even more sharply than Snelling had
contemplated."
The result: in two years the state red ink was gone.
This fiscal conservatism extended to all areas in government except one: health care. When Dean became governor, prior state administrations laid the
groundwork for what would become one of his biggest selling points in 2003, his expansion of state Medicaid and other social welfare programs to
extend health care to children and young families.
On the �War on Terror�, there is has been zero effect or progress charted by the Bush team: Afghanistan is all tribal warlord & drug lord owned, the
taliban has regrouped & is growing stronger, and the only area of �democracy� is in the capital city of Kabul. That too is also a joke, because there
have been two attempts on the Afghani president & they�ve already killed the VP !!!!
In Iraq, we�ve killed thousands upon thousands of people. As much as half being
non-combatants. The guerilla warfare I had predicted before
this cluster# started is taking place. But, as they would have it spun, it�s not by foreign nationals sneaking into Iraq�.it�s by Iraqis.
�Them wanting democracy but not knowing it yet�? We�ve brought nothing of the sort: the Iraqi national Congress was picked in Washington, Paul Bremmer
has shut down all the TV/Radio/Press outlets in the country, and there is zero concrete to any talk of the country, or it�s oil resources, being
turned over to the Iraqi people within any defined time frame. Where the HELL are we being Democratic!?!?
The �idealism� that you say you admire in Bush is equivalent to a 16 yr old boy trying to get into his girlfriends pants: � I love you & will respect
you� is what gets it done, but what does she have afterwards? He�s got the same bullshyte dripping from his lips that he had in 2000�.where are the
realization of those ideals? And if you ascribe it to his handlers, what makes you think anything is going to change? Why would you even think that he
lives on a street called �hope� if the PNAC plan, which was written by the people now running the country in 1998, is being implemented to the
letter?
I agree that Bush thinks he can change the world for the better; just not for anybody else
but the same folks from where he comes and who he
serves.
Dean stutters? OK, but when was the last time you watched Bush in an unscripted speech? Dean has already spoken more in public ( GOP fundraisers don�t
count) than Bush has his entire term.
There is allot more to a Dem president than to be a counter against Fundamentalist judges: the economy, our social well being/solvency and our wealth
of culture/prosperity/honor. All of which have been squandered under Bush.